Patterns of island fox habitat use in sand dune habitat on San Clemente Island

IF 1.7 3区 生物学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Holly Gamblin, David Green, Jesse Maestas, Andrew S. Bridges, D. Garcelon
{"title":"Patterns of island fox habitat use in sand dune habitat on San Clemente Island","authors":"Holly Gamblin, David Green, Jesse Maestas, Andrew S. Bridges, D. Garcelon","doi":"10.1002/wlb3.01330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On San Clemente Island (SCI), the island fox subspecies Urocyon littoralis clementae has been monitored annually since 1988 to track long‐term population trends. Annual density estimates in most habitat types across the island range from 2 to 13 foxes/km2, yet unusually high estimates have repeatedly approached 50 foxes/km2 in a unique sand dune habitat area. Although sand dune habitat is restricted to one small area on the island, these estimates suggest sand dune habitat supports one of the highest population densities of any fox species in the world, and it may support > 5% of the SCI fox population. This finding prompted our investigation to determine if SCI foxes captured in the sand dunes habitat area maintained home ranges within this habitat type. Between January and July 2018, we used global positioning system (GPS) collars to track the movements of 12 island foxes captured in the sand dune habitat area. Contrary to our initial predictions, we found that island foxes captured in the sand dune habitat area do maintain home ranges and core areas centralized in sand dune habitat. All 12 island fox home ranges estimated contained > 50% sand dune habitat in either their 50% or 95% fixed kernel density estimate (KDE) home range, and island foxes were 3.14 times more likely to use active sand dune habitat when compared to the second most abundant habitat type, maritime desert scrub (Adjusted β = 3.14, 95% CI = 3.07–3.12). We also found that island foxes in sand dune habitat maintained much smaller home ranges than reported estimates in other habitat types, with an average 95% KDE home range size of 0.42 km2 (95% CI = 0.20–0.63 km2). Although sand dune habitat comprises just 2% of available habitat on SCI, our research highlights the importance of this unique habitat area for island foxes.","PeriodicalId":54405,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wlb3.01330","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On San Clemente Island (SCI), the island fox subspecies Urocyon littoralis clementae has been monitored annually since 1988 to track long‐term population trends. Annual density estimates in most habitat types across the island range from 2 to 13 foxes/km2, yet unusually high estimates have repeatedly approached 50 foxes/km2 in a unique sand dune habitat area. Although sand dune habitat is restricted to one small area on the island, these estimates suggest sand dune habitat supports one of the highest population densities of any fox species in the world, and it may support > 5% of the SCI fox population. This finding prompted our investigation to determine if SCI foxes captured in the sand dunes habitat area maintained home ranges within this habitat type. Between January and July 2018, we used global positioning system (GPS) collars to track the movements of 12 island foxes captured in the sand dune habitat area. Contrary to our initial predictions, we found that island foxes captured in the sand dune habitat area do maintain home ranges and core areas centralized in sand dune habitat. All 12 island fox home ranges estimated contained > 50% sand dune habitat in either their 50% or 95% fixed kernel density estimate (KDE) home range, and island foxes were 3.14 times more likely to use active sand dune habitat when compared to the second most abundant habitat type, maritime desert scrub (Adjusted β = 3.14, 95% CI = 3.07–3.12). We also found that island foxes in sand dune habitat maintained much smaller home ranges than reported estimates in other habitat types, with an average 95% KDE home range size of 0.42 km2 (95% CI = 0.20–0.63 km2). Although sand dune habitat comprises just 2% of available habitat on SCI, our research highlights the importance of this unique habitat area for island foxes.
圣克莱门特岛沙丘栖息地的岛狐栖息地利用模式
自 1988 年以来,每年都会对圣克莱门特岛(SCI)上的岛狐亚种 Urocyon littoralis clementae 进行监测,以跟踪其长期种群趋势。全岛大多数栖息地类型的年密度估计值为 2 到 13 只/平方公里,但在一个独特的沙丘栖息地,年密度估计值曾多次接近 50 只/平方公里。虽然沙丘栖息地仅限于岛上的一小块区域,但这些估计值表明,沙丘栖息地是世界上狐狸种群密度最高的栖息地之一,可能占 SCI 狐狸种群的 5%以上。这一发现促使我们进行调查,以确定在沙丘栖息地捕获的 SCI 狐是否在这一栖息地类型中保持了家园范围。2018年1月至7月期间,我们使用全球定位系统(GPS)项圈追踪了在沙丘栖息地捕获的12只岛狐的活动轨迹。与我们最初的预测相反,我们发现在沙丘栖息地捕获的岛狐确实保持着以沙丘栖息地为中心的家园范围和核心区域。所有12个估计的岛狐家域中,50%或95%固定内核密度估计值(KDE)家域中沙丘栖息地的比例均大于50%,与第二大栖息地类型--海洋性沙漠灌丛相比,岛狐使用活跃沙丘栖息地的可能性要高出3.14倍(调整后的β = 3.14,95% CI = 3.07-3.12)。我们还发现,沙丘栖息地中的岛狐所维持的家园范围比其它栖息地类型中的估计家园范围要小得多,平均95% KDE家园范围大小为0.42平方公里(95% CI = 0.20-0.63平方公里)。虽然沙丘栖息地仅占SCI可用栖息地的2%,但我们的研究强调了这一独特栖息地对岛狐的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wildlife Biology
Wildlife Biology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: WILDLIFE BIOLOGY is a high-quality scientific forum directing concise and up-to-date information to scientists, administrators, wildlife managers and conservationists. The journal encourages and welcomes original papers, short communications and reviews written in English from throughout the world. The journal accepts theoretical, empirical, and practical articles of high standard from all areas of wildlife science with the primary task of creating the scientific basis for the enhancement of wildlife management practices. Our concept of ''wildlife'' mainly includes mammal and bird species, but studies on other species or phenomena relevant to wildlife management are also of great interest. We adopt a broad concept of wildlife management, including all structures and actions with the purpose of conservation, sustainable use, and/or control of wildlife and its habitats, in order to safeguard sustainable relationships between wildlife and other human interests.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信