Critical Engaged Pedagogy to Confront Racism and Colonialism in (Geo) Science Education Through a Historical Lens

E. Diaz‐Vallejo, Ken Keefover-Ring, Elizabeth Hennessy, E. Marín-Spiotta
{"title":"Critical Engaged Pedagogy to Confront Racism and Colonialism in (Geo) Science Education Through a Historical Lens","authors":"E. Diaz‐Vallejo, Ken Keefover-Ring, Elizabeth Hennessy, E. Marín-Spiotta","doi":"10.3389/esss.2024.10114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The geosciences continue to grapple with the exclusion of Black, Indigenous, Latinx, and other students of Color. These patterns can be understood in the discipline’s roots in colonialism and extractivism. Furthermore, training of the scientific process as objective and race-neutral results in scientists who do not recognize how science can perpetuate inequities in society. Using a U.S. university biogeography course as a case study, we describe an innovative framework for teaching equity through a critical historical lens that interrogates: 1) biases in the processes and forms of knowledge production, legitimization, and exclusion; 2) the source of inequities in representation in the discipline; and 3) how societal benefits and harms of scientific practices are felt disproportionately demographically and geographically. Students were encouraged to critically analyze the historical context of scientific theories and their proponents and challenge assumptions about the representativeness of data supporting those theories into the present day. Engaging with these questions broadened students’ understanding of changing paradigms in the field and of links between colonialism and modern science. We provide recommendations for instructors seeking to use similar approaches to enhance student learning.","PeriodicalId":148192,"journal":{"name":"Earth Science, Systems and Society","volume":"9 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Science, Systems and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/esss.2024.10114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The geosciences continue to grapple with the exclusion of Black, Indigenous, Latinx, and other students of Color. These patterns can be understood in the discipline’s roots in colonialism and extractivism. Furthermore, training of the scientific process as objective and race-neutral results in scientists who do not recognize how science can perpetuate inequities in society. Using a U.S. university biogeography course as a case study, we describe an innovative framework for teaching equity through a critical historical lens that interrogates: 1) biases in the processes and forms of knowledge production, legitimization, and exclusion; 2) the source of inequities in representation in the discipline; and 3) how societal benefits and harms of scientific practices are felt disproportionately demographically and geographically. Students were encouraged to critically analyze the historical context of scientific theories and their proponents and challenge assumptions about the representativeness of data supporting those theories into the present day. Engaging with these questions broadened students’ understanding of changing paradigms in the field and of links between colonialism and modern science. We provide recommendations for instructors seeking to use similar approaches to enhance student learning.
通过历史视角以批判性参与教学法对抗(地理)科学教育中的种族主义和殖民主义
地球科学仍在努力解决黑人、土著人、拉丁裔和其他有色人种学生被排斥在外的问题。这些模式可以从该学科植根于殖民主义和采掘主义中得到理解。此外,将科学过程视为客观和种族中立的培训导致科学家们没有认识到科学是如何使社会中的不平等永久化的。以美国一所大学的生物地理学课程为案例,我们描述了一个通过批判性历史视角进行公平教学的创新框架,该框架对以下问题进行了审视:1)知识生产、合法化和排斥的过程和形式中的偏见;2)学科代表性不平等的根源;3)科学实践的社会效益和危害是如何在人口和地理上不相称地感受到的。我们鼓励学生批判性地分析科学理论及其支持者的历史背景,并对支持这些理论的数据的代表性假设提出质疑。对这些问题的探讨拓宽了学生对该领域范式变化以及殖民主义与现代科学之间联系的理解。我们为寻求使用类似方法来提高学生学习效果的教师提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信