Force, Inertia and Motion from Aristotle to nowadays didactics

Franco Bocci
{"title":"Force, Inertia and Motion from Aristotle to nowadays didactics","authors":"Franco Bocci","doi":"10.1088/1361-6404/ad61d0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study delves into the historical development of the core principles of dynamics, namely the interplay between forces and motion. We explore the intricate and nonlinear transition from the Aristotelian framework, which held sway for eighteen centuries, to the Newtonian paradigm. We posit that the complexity of this transition largely stems from what we perceive as an inadequate understanding of force. Our focus lies particularly on the seminal contributions of Galileo and the subsequent remarkable advancements made by Newton. However, we also note that, somewhat surprisingly, the transition doesn't conclude with Newton himself. What is commonly known as Newtonian dynamics in modern textbooks diverges significantly from the original theory outlined in the Principia, and we endeavour to elucidate these disparities. In the concluding sections, we scrutinise the implications of these concepts for contemporary teaching methodologies. Specifically, we delve into various interpretations of the Principle of Inertia, the Second Law, and their interrelationship, pinpointing what we perceive as weak points in current didactic approaches and proffering some suggestions for effectively imparting these concepts.","PeriodicalId":505733,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Physics","volume":"18 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ad61d0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study delves into the historical development of the core principles of dynamics, namely the interplay between forces and motion. We explore the intricate and nonlinear transition from the Aristotelian framework, which held sway for eighteen centuries, to the Newtonian paradigm. We posit that the complexity of this transition largely stems from what we perceive as an inadequate understanding of force. Our focus lies particularly on the seminal contributions of Galileo and the subsequent remarkable advancements made by Newton. However, we also note that, somewhat surprisingly, the transition doesn't conclude with Newton himself. What is commonly known as Newtonian dynamics in modern textbooks diverges significantly from the original theory outlined in the Principia, and we endeavour to elucidate these disparities. In the concluding sections, we scrutinise the implications of these concepts for contemporary teaching methodologies. Specifically, we delve into various interpretations of the Principle of Inertia, the Second Law, and their interrelationship, pinpointing what we perceive as weak points in current didactic approaches and proffering some suggestions for effectively imparting these concepts.
从亚里士多德到当今的教学法:力、惯性和运动
本研究深入探讨了动力学核心原理(即力与运动之间的相互作用)的历史发展。我们探讨了从亚里士多德框架到牛顿范式之间错综复杂的非线性过渡。我们认为,这一过渡的复杂性主要源于我们对力的认识不足。我们尤其关注伽利略的开创性贡献以及牛顿随后取得的显著进步。然而,我们也注意到,令人惊讶的是,牛顿本人并没有结束这一转变。现代教科书中通常所说的牛顿动力学与《原理》中概述的原始理论有很大差异,我们将努力阐明这些差异。在结论部分,我们仔细研究了这些概念对当代教学方法的影响。具体而言,我们深入探讨了对惯性原理、第二定律及其相互关系的各种解释,指出了我们认为当前教学方法的薄弱环节,并提出了一些有效传授这些概念的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信