Abdurahman M. Alruwaili, Bassant Mowafey, Mohammed A. Elbialy, Mohammad K. Alam, Marwa A. Tawfik
{"title":"Evaluation and Correlation of Facial Asymmetry in Adults with Class I, Class II, and Class III Skeletal Relation","authors":"Abdurahman M. Alruwaili, Bassant Mowafey, Mohammed A. Elbialy, Mohammad K. Alam, Marwa A. Tawfik","doi":"10.36347/sjds.2024.v11i05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The current study with the prime objectives revolved around investigating and evaluating the differences of facial asymmetry in adults who suffer from Class I, Class II, and Class III skeletal relations, and to also evaluate the extent to which soft tissue either accentuate or mask such differences altogether. Material and Methods: A total of 225 frontal photographs of adult patients who was attended and was diagnosed in orthodontic department at Al-Mansoura University and were took to evaluate facial asymmetry. The subjects were divided in three groups; namely Group I, II, and III that pertain to Class I, II, and III patients with each Group/Class appointed to 75 participants respectively. Each Group was divided into sub-groups; a and b, for each Class. Digital photos were took using a Canon 600d digital camera. Result: Findings revealed that between Class I and Class III and Class II and Class III the Pronasale point was the only point that caused a statistical significance as opposed to the Labial Superior and Menton points; (p=0.03, p=0.02) respectively. Other statistically significant differences were found among Class I, II, and III groups regarding the distance between mid-facial plane point and the left exocanthus for; (p = 0.012) and regarding the distance between MFP and the left ala for; (p = 0.04). Conclusion: It was concluded that though Class I, II, and III malocclusions may have distinct skeletal differences, the appearance of the soft tissues can obscure the distinctions, creating a seemingly uniform image. Regarding the PN point, it can be concluded that patients who suffer from Class I, Class II and Class III had a wider right hemiface, and that patients who suffer from Class II and Class III had a wider right hemiface regarding both the LS and ME points respectively. Generally speaking, 56%, 52%, and 52% of the subjects had a wider right hemiface regarding the PN, LS, and ME points respectively.","PeriodicalId":508961,"journal":{"name":"Scholars Journal of Dental Sciences","volume":"5 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scholars Journal of Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36347/sjds.2024.v11i05.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The current study with the prime objectives revolved around investigating and evaluating the differences of facial asymmetry in adults who suffer from Class I, Class II, and Class III skeletal relations, and to also evaluate the extent to which soft tissue either accentuate or mask such differences altogether. Material and Methods: A total of 225 frontal photographs of adult patients who was attended and was diagnosed in orthodontic department at Al-Mansoura University and were took to evaluate facial asymmetry. The subjects were divided in three groups; namely Group I, II, and III that pertain to Class I, II, and III patients with each Group/Class appointed to 75 participants respectively. Each Group was divided into sub-groups; a and b, for each Class. Digital photos were took using a Canon 600d digital camera. Result: Findings revealed that between Class I and Class III and Class II and Class III the Pronasale point was the only point that caused a statistical significance as opposed to the Labial Superior and Menton points; (p=0.03, p=0.02) respectively. Other statistically significant differences were found among Class I, II, and III groups regarding the distance between mid-facial plane point and the left exocanthus for; (p = 0.012) and regarding the distance between MFP and the left ala for; (p = 0.04). Conclusion: It was concluded that though Class I, II, and III malocclusions may have distinct skeletal differences, the appearance of the soft tissues can obscure the distinctions, creating a seemingly uniform image. Regarding the PN point, it can be concluded that patients who suffer from Class I, Class II and Class III had a wider right hemiface, and that patients who suffer from Class II and Class III had a wider right hemiface regarding both the LS and ME points respectively. Generally speaking, 56%, 52%, and 52% of the subjects had a wider right hemiface regarding the PN, LS, and ME points respectively.
研究背景本研究的主要目的是调查和评估Ⅰ类、Ⅱ类和Ⅲ类骨骼关系成人面部不对称的差异,并评估软组织在多大程度上突出或完全掩盖了这种差异。材料与方法共拍摄了 225 张在曼苏尔大学正畸科就诊和确诊的成年患者的正面照片,以评估面部不对称情况。受试者被分为三组,即第一组、第二组和第三组,分别为 I 级、II 级和 III 级患者,每组/每级分别有 75 名受试者。每组又分为 a 和 b 两个子组。使用佳能 600d 数码相机拍摄数码照片。结果研究结果表明,在 I 级和 III 级之间,以及 II 级和 III 级之间,前庭穴是唯一一个与唇上穴和孟顿穴相比具有统计学意义的穴位;(分别为 p=0.03 和 p=0.02)。在Ⅰ、Ⅱ和Ⅲ类组中,面中线点与左外侧的距离(p=0.012)和面中线点与左侧龈沟的距离(p=0.04)也存在统计学意义上的差异。结论结论是,虽然 I、II 和 III 类畸形可能有明显的骨骼差异,但软组织的外观会掩盖这些差异,从而形成看似统一的形象。就 PN 点而言,可以得出结论:Ⅰ类、Ⅱ类和Ⅲ类患者的右侧半面较宽,而Ⅱ类和Ⅲ类患者的 LS 点和 ME 点的右侧半面分别较宽。总体而言,56%、52% 和 52% 的受试者在 PN、LS 和 ME 点的右侧半面较宽。