Routine Coronary Angiography and Functional Cardiac Tests before Resection of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Patients without Symptoms of Myocardial Infarction

A. V. Abrosimov, A. V. Chupin, A. F. Kharazov, Evgeniy M. Troshin, N. R. Masalimov
{"title":"Routine Coronary Angiography and Functional Cardiac Tests before Resection of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Patients without Symptoms of Myocardial Infarction","authors":"A. V. Abrosimov, A. V. Chupin, A. F. Kharazov, Evgeniy M. Troshin, N. R. Masalimov","doi":"10.17816/pavlovj595860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Cardiac complications are leaders in the structure of mortality of patients after resection of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). In recent years more data have been obtained on the possibility of performing invasive coronary angiography (CAG) as a method of preoperative assessment of the condition of the coronary arteries. \nAIM: To assess the tactics of routine CAG and preventive revascularization of the myocardium in comparison with non-invasive functional tests in patients without clinical manifestations of coronary heart disease (CHD) from positions of the hospital outcomes of AAA resections. \nMATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study included 205 patients without clinical and instrumental signs of CHD who underwent AAA resection at National Medical Research Center of Surgery named after A. Vishnevsky in 2001–2021. Patients of the first group (n = 55) underwent CAG before AAA resection and, if significant stenosis of coronary arteries was detected, revascularization of the myocardium was performed. In patients of the second group (n = 71), only functional cardiac tests were conducted before the operation. Patients of the third group were operated on without additional evaluation of cardiac status. \nRESULTS: In 30.9% of patients of the first group, significant coronary lesions were detected, in 29.5% of them with the involvement of the left main coronary artery. This required 10 percutaneous coronary interventions and 5 coronary artery bypass surgeries, which made 27.0% of patients in this group. No cases of myocardial infarction were recorded in this group. In the second and third groups, one case of myocardial infarction in each group was recorded (p = 0.688). There was no significant difference in the postoperative mortality in all the groups (1.8%; 4.2%; 2.5%, respectively; p = 0.704). To this end, maximally invasive diagnostic tactics increased the average waiting time for AAA resection: 52.2 ± 6.0 days in groups without coronary angiography and myocardial revascularization versus 99.2 ± 13.0 days in the first group. \nCONCLUSION: In a cohort of patients without anamnestic and clinical manifestations of coronary artery disease, the tactics of routine coronary angiography followed by prophylactic myocardial revascularization did not improve the short-term results of AAA resection, while the waiting period for intervention on the abdominal aorta increased. Preoperative tactics with functional cardiac tests also did not affect the treatment results.","PeriodicalId":113364,"journal":{"name":"I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald","volume":"29 51","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/pavlovj595860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac complications are leaders in the structure of mortality of patients after resection of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). In recent years more data have been obtained on the possibility of performing invasive coronary angiography (CAG) as a method of preoperative assessment of the condition of the coronary arteries. AIM: To assess the tactics of routine CAG and preventive revascularization of the myocardium in comparison with non-invasive functional tests in patients without clinical manifestations of coronary heart disease (CHD) from positions of the hospital outcomes of AAA resections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study included 205 patients without clinical and instrumental signs of CHD who underwent AAA resection at National Medical Research Center of Surgery named after A. Vishnevsky in 2001–2021. Patients of the first group (n = 55) underwent CAG before AAA resection and, if significant stenosis of coronary arteries was detected, revascularization of the myocardium was performed. In patients of the second group (n = 71), only functional cardiac tests were conducted before the operation. Patients of the third group were operated on without additional evaluation of cardiac status. RESULTS: In 30.9% of patients of the first group, significant coronary lesions were detected, in 29.5% of them with the involvement of the left main coronary artery. This required 10 percutaneous coronary interventions and 5 coronary artery bypass surgeries, which made 27.0% of patients in this group. No cases of myocardial infarction were recorded in this group. In the second and third groups, one case of myocardial infarction in each group was recorded (p = 0.688). There was no significant difference in the postoperative mortality in all the groups (1.8%; 4.2%; 2.5%, respectively; p = 0.704). To this end, maximally invasive diagnostic tactics increased the average waiting time for AAA resection: 52.2 ± 6.0 days in groups without coronary angiography and myocardial revascularization versus 99.2 ± 13.0 days in the first group. CONCLUSION: In a cohort of patients without anamnestic and clinical manifestations of coronary artery disease, the tactics of routine coronary angiography followed by prophylactic myocardial revascularization did not improve the short-term results of AAA resection, while the waiting period for intervention on the abdominal aorta increased. Preoperative tactics with functional cardiac tests also did not affect the treatment results.
无心肌梗死症状患者腹主动脉瘤切除术前的常规冠状动脉造影和心脏功能测试
简介:心脏并发症是腹主动脉瘤(AAA)切除术后患者死亡率的主要原因。近年来,有越来越多的数据表明,进行有创冠状动脉造影术(CAG)可作为术前评估冠状动脉状况的一种方法。目的:从 AAA 切除术的住院结果出发,评估常规 CAG 和预防性心肌血管再通与无创功能测试在无冠心病(CHD)临床表现患者中的应用效果。材料与方法:回顾性研究纳入了 2001-2021 年期间在以 A. Vishnevsky 命名的国立外科医学研究中心接受 AAA 切除术的 205 名无冠心病临床表现和器质性病征的患者。第一组患者(55 人)在 AAA 切除术前接受了 CAG 检查,如果发现冠状动脉明显狭窄,则对心肌进行血管重建。第二组患者(71 人)在手术前只进行了心脏功能检查。第三组患者在手术前未对心脏状况进行额外评估。结果:第一组患者中有 30.9% 发现冠状动脉明显病变,其中 29.5% 涉及左冠状动脉主干。这就需要进行 10 次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和 5 次冠状动脉搭桥手术,占该组患者的 27.0%。这组患者中没有心肌梗死病例。在第二组和第三组中,每组都有一例心肌梗死病例(P = 0.688)。各组的术后死亡率无明显差异(分别为 1.8%;4.2%;2.5%;P = 0.704)。为此,最大创面诊断战术增加了 AAA 切除术的平均等待时间:未进行冠状动脉造影和心肌血运重建的组为(52.2 ± 6.0)天,而第一组为(99.2 ± 13.0)天。结论:在一组没有冠状动脉疾病的症状和临床表现的患者中,常规冠状动脉造影和预防性心肌血运重建的策略并不能改善 AAA 切除术的短期效果,而对腹主动脉进行干预的等待时间却延长了。术前心脏功能检查策略也没有影响治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信