Land, Labor, and Relationality: A Critical Engagement of Marx and Indigenous Studies

IF 1.2 Q1 HISTORY
Kelsey Lindquist
{"title":"Land, Labor, and Relationality: A Critical Engagement of Marx and Indigenous Studies","authors":"Kelsey Lindquist","doi":"10.17953/a3.1916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the author places Marxist scholarship in conversation with critical Indigenous theory, outlining Marx's insights and tracing recent development within Marxist-feminist literature before critiquing this scholarship from the perspective of critical Indigenous theory. The author argues that the failure to attend to Indigenous sovereignties is a critical limitation undermining attempts to theorize multiple systems of oppression, demonstrating that critical Indigenous theory, with its more expansive understanding of relationality, not only addresses this limitation but also extends the theorization beyond the logic of capital.","PeriodicalId":80424,"journal":{"name":"American Indian culture and research journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Indian culture and research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17953/a3.1916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, the author places Marxist scholarship in conversation with critical Indigenous theory, outlining Marx's insights and tracing recent development within Marxist-feminist literature before critiquing this scholarship from the perspective of critical Indigenous theory. The author argues that the failure to attend to Indigenous sovereignties is a critical limitation undermining attempts to theorize multiple systems of oppression, demonstrating that critical Indigenous theory, with its more expansive understanding of relationality, not only addresses this limitation but also extends the theorization beyond the logic of capital.
土地、劳动和关系:马克思与土著研究的批判性接触
在本文中,作者将马克思主义学术研究与批判性土著理论相结合,概述了马克思的见解,并追溯了马克思主义-女权主义文献的最新发展,然后从批判性土著理论的角度对这些学术研究进行了批评。作者认为,未能关注土著主权是一个关键的局限,破坏了将多重压迫体系理论化的尝试,并表明批判性土著理论以其对关系性更广泛的理解,不仅解决了这一局限,还将理论化扩展到了资本逻辑之外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信