Marketing Channels of Pomegranate in Pune Division of Maharashtra, India

Umesh D. Tamboli, Mahesh R. Prajapati
{"title":"Marketing Channels of Pomegranate in Pune Division of Maharashtra, India","authors":"Umesh D. Tamboli, Mahesh R. Prajapati","doi":"10.9734/acri/2024/v24i6767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pomegranate, scientifically named Punica granatum L., is prized globally, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions like India, Iran, and Spain. Pomegranate cultivation has surged in India, notably in Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Karnataka, with India emerging as a top global producer. In 2020-21, India expanded pomegranate cultivation to 2.88 lakh hectares, yielding 32.70 lakh tonnes. Maharashtra led with 54.89% of national production and 59.38% of cultivated area, underscoring its key role despite slightly lower productivity than the national average. The objectives of the study were to identify different marketing channels of pomegranate, to estimate the price spread and marketing efficiency of identified marketing channels and to identify problems faced by stakeholders. The primary data was collected from 60 Pomegranate farmers and from 30 intermediaries. The study identified four different pomegranate marketing channels. Channel-1 (Producer →Pre-harvest contractor → Wholesaler-cum-commission agent→ Retailer →Consumer), Channel-2 (Producer →Wholesaler-cum-commission agent→ retailer → consumer), Channel-3 (Producer →Collection Center (CC) → Distribution Center (DC) → Consumer), Channel-4 (Producer →Village trader →Wholesaler-cum-commission agent →Retailer → Consumer). Channel-3 providing producers with 69.78% of the consumer price and demonstrating highest efficiency (2.31) for its Acharya-Agarwal marketing efficiency method was used. Pomegranate producers face challenges including high transportation costs, storage issues, price volatility, and market information deficits. Production problems include pest infestations, high input costs, and labor shortages. Intermediaries grapple with quality variation, labor scarcity, and price fluctuations. Strategic interventions in infrastructure, logistics, and market intelligence are crucial for sustainable profitability.","PeriodicalId":505151,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Current Research International","volume":"28 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Current Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/acri/2024/v24i6767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pomegranate, scientifically named Punica granatum L., is prized globally, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions like India, Iran, and Spain. Pomegranate cultivation has surged in India, notably in Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Karnataka, with India emerging as a top global producer. In 2020-21, India expanded pomegranate cultivation to 2.88 lakh hectares, yielding 32.70 lakh tonnes. Maharashtra led with 54.89% of national production and 59.38% of cultivated area, underscoring its key role despite slightly lower productivity than the national average. The objectives of the study were to identify different marketing channels of pomegranate, to estimate the price spread and marketing efficiency of identified marketing channels and to identify problems faced by stakeholders. The primary data was collected from 60 Pomegranate farmers and from 30 intermediaries. The study identified four different pomegranate marketing channels. Channel-1 (Producer →Pre-harvest contractor → Wholesaler-cum-commission agent→ Retailer →Consumer), Channel-2 (Producer →Wholesaler-cum-commission agent→ retailer → consumer), Channel-3 (Producer →Collection Center (CC) → Distribution Center (DC) → Consumer), Channel-4 (Producer →Village trader →Wholesaler-cum-commission agent →Retailer → Consumer). Channel-3 providing producers with 69.78% of the consumer price and demonstrating highest efficiency (2.31) for its Acharya-Agarwal marketing efficiency method was used. Pomegranate producers face challenges including high transportation costs, storage issues, price volatility, and market information deficits. Production problems include pest infestations, high input costs, and labor shortages. Intermediaries grapple with quality variation, labor scarcity, and price fluctuations. Strategic interventions in infrastructure, logistics, and market intelligence are crucial for sustainable profitability.
印度马哈拉施特拉邦普纳分区石榴的营销渠道
石榴的学名为 Punica granatum L.,是全球的珍品,尤其是在印度、伊朗和西班牙等热带和亚热带地区。石榴种植在印度激增,尤其是在马哈拉施特拉邦、古吉拉特邦和卡纳塔克邦,印度已成为全球顶级生产国。2020-21 年,印度石榴种植面积扩大到 288 万公顷,产量达到 3270 万吨。马哈拉施特拉邦的石榴产量占全国产量的 54.89%,种植面积占全国面积的 59.38%,尽管生产率略低于全国平均水平,但马哈拉施特拉邦的石榴产量和种植面积仍遥遥领先,凸显了其关键作用。这项研究的目的是确定石榴的不同销售渠道,估算已确定的销售渠道的价差和销售效率,并找出利益相关者面临的问题。从 60 个石榴种植农和 30 个中间商处收集了原始数据。研究确定了四种不同的石榴营销渠道。渠道-1(生产者→收获前承包商→批发商兼佣金代理→零售商→消费者),渠道-2(生产者→批发商兼佣金代理→零售商→消费者),渠道-3(生产者→收集中心(CC)→分销中心(DC)→消费者),渠道-4(生产者→乡村贸易商→批发商兼佣金代理→零售商→消费者)。渠道-3 为生产者提供 69.78% 的消费价格,其 Acharya-Agarwal 营销效率法的效率最高(2.31)。石榴生产者面临的挑战包括运输成本高、储存问题、价格波动和市场信息不足。生产问题包括虫害、高投入成本和劳动力短缺。中间商则要应对质量差异、劳动力稀缺和价格波动等问题。对基础设施、物流和市场情报进行战略性干预,对实现可持续盈利至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信