Novel use of local analgesia prior to intramuscular magnesium sulphate injection compared to mixed local analgesia with magnesium sulphate to reduce pain: a randomised crossover study in patients being managed for eclampsia and preeclampsia

Modimowame Jamieson, Rebecca Luckett, G. Hofmeyr
{"title":"Novel use of local analgesia prior to intramuscular magnesium sulphate injection compared to mixed local analgesia with magnesium sulphate to reduce pain: a randomised crossover study in patients being managed for eclampsia and preeclampsia","authors":"Modimowame Jamieson, Rebecca Luckett, G. Hofmeyr","doi":"10.3389/fpain.2024.1376608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The World Health Organization (WHO) recommended addition of local anesthetic to reduce the intense pain of intramuscular injection of 50% Magnesium Sulphate (MgSO4) salt solution has been found to be ineffective. We tested whether giving the local anesthetic 5 min before the MgSO4 injection would reduce pain.We conducted a prospective cross-over trial where each participant with pre-eclampsia or eclampsia received sequential and mixed injection methods in random sequence during sequential MgSO4 administrations. Pain and preference were assessed using descriptive words, a numeric pain scale and direct comparison between the two injection methods. Differences were measured using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals and the Chi squared or Fisher's test. The administration techniques were refined based on an initial pilot of 8 participants.We enrolled 49 consented participants and analysed data from 41 post-pilot participants The sequential injection method had a non-significantly lower mean pain score than the mixed injection method (3.1 vs. 3.3, p = 0.44). Severe pain was reported for 3/41 vs. 9/41, p = 0.12. The sequential injection method was perceived to be more painful by 13 (37%) vs. 22 (63%) participants (p = 0.03). The sequential injection was preferred by 21(60%) vs. 14 participants (40%) (p = 0.1).Our results consistently favoured the novel sequential injection method. The lack of statistical significance for most results is not surprising given the small sample size. Given the potential for clinically important benefits to women, a larger study to confirm these results is justified.\nhttps://pactr.samrc.ac.za/, Identifier (PACTR202201521544765).","PeriodicalId":12641,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pain Research","volume":"64 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpain.2024.1376608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommended addition of local anesthetic to reduce the intense pain of intramuscular injection of 50% Magnesium Sulphate (MgSO4) salt solution has been found to be ineffective. We tested whether giving the local anesthetic 5 min before the MgSO4 injection would reduce pain.We conducted a prospective cross-over trial where each participant with pre-eclampsia or eclampsia received sequential and mixed injection methods in random sequence during sequential MgSO4 administrations. Pain and preference were assessed using descriptive words, a numeric pain scale and direct comparison between the two injection methods. Differences were measured using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals and the Chi squared or Fisher's test. The administration techniques were refined based on an initial pilot of 8 participants.We enrolled 49 consented participants and analysed data from 41 post-pilot participants The sequential injection method had a non-significantly lower mean pain score than the mixed injection method (3.1 vs. 3.3, p = 0.44). Severe pain was reported for 3/41 vs. 9/41, p = 0.12. The sequential injection method was perceived to be more painful by 13 (37%) vs. 22 (63%) participants (p = 0.03). The sequential injection was preferred by 21(60%) vs. 14 participants (40%) (p = 0.1).Our results consistently favoured the novel sequential injection method. The lack of statistical significance for most results is not surprising given the small sample size. Given the potential for clinically important benefits to women, a larger study to confirm these results is justified. https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/, Identifier (PACTR202201521544765).
在肌肉注射硫酸镁前使用局部镇痛与使用硫酸镁混合局部镇痛以减轻疼痛的新方法:一项针对子痫和先兆子痫患者的随机交叉研究
世界卫生组织(WHO)建议在肌肉注射50%硫酸镁(MgSO4)盐溶液时加入局部麻醉剂以减轻剧烈疼痛,但结果发现效果不佳。我们进行了一项前瞻性交叉试验,让每位子痫前期或子痫患者在连续注射硫酸镁时随机接受顺序注射法和混合注射法。采用描述性词汇、数字疼痛量表和两种注射方法之间的直接比较来评估疼痛和偏好。采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验、带有 95% 置信区间的风险比、Chi 平方检验或费雪检验来衡量差异。我们招募了 49 名获得同意的参与者,并对 41 名试点后参与者的数据进行了分析。顺序注射法的平均疼痛评分比混合注射法低(3.1 对 3.3,p = 0.44),但差异不显著。3/41 对 9/41,p = 0.12。有 13 人(37%)认为顺序注射法更痛,22 人(63%)认为顺序注射法更痛(p = 0.03)。21名参与者(60%)与 14 名参与者(40%)相比更倾向于顺序注射法(p = 0.1)。由于样本量较小,大多数结果缺乏统计学意义并不奇怪。鉴于该方法可能给妇女带来重要的临床益处,有必要进行更大规模的研究来证实这些结果。https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/,标识符 (PACTR202201521544765)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信