Support Vector Machine, Naive Bayes, and Artificial Neural Network Back Propagation Comparison in Detecting Brain Tumor

P. Triadyaksa, Harisma Zaini Ahmad, I. Marhaendrajaya
{"title":"Support Vector Machine, Naive Bayes, and Artificial Neural Network Back Propagation Comparison in Detecting Brain Tumor","authors":"P. Triadyaksa, Harisma Zaini Ahmad, I. Marhaendrajaya","doi":"10.14710/dmj.v13i4.45462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Brain tumors are abnormal tissue that grow uncontrolled and affect a patient's neurological function. Brain tumors come in different shapes and characteristics. Moreover, its location also differs for each patient. Brain tumors can be detected using machine learning algorithms using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images. However, a different machine-learning comparison is limited and needs further investigation. This study aims to compare three machine-learning methods, i.e., Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naive Bayes (NB), and Artificial Neural Network Back Propagation (ANN-BP) algorithms for detecting brain tumors. Before the comparison started, MRI image quality was enhanced by performing denoising, histogram equalization, and thresholding. After that, Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix feature extraction was performed. MRI brain images in JPEG format were acquired from an open-access database. One thousand brain tumor and 1000 normal tumor images are used as the training data, while 100 brain tumor and 100 normal tumor images are used as testing data. Each algorithm's accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) are evaluated and reported. The study showed that the SVM algorithm acquired the highest performance in detecting brain tumors, followed by ANN-BP and NB. The highest accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and MCC values for testing in SVM were 98,75%, 98,22%, 99,30%, and 0,9751, respectively. Meanwhile, in testing, the highest accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and MCC values were 90.50%, 98.80%, 82.00%, and 0.8220, respectively. In conclusion, this study showed the superiority of the SVM algorithm in detecting brain tumor compared to ANN-BP and NB by performing image enhancement steps and GLCM feature extraction before its detection.","PeriodicalId":426927,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Kedokteran Diponegoro (Diponegoro Medical Journal)","volume":"64 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Kedokteran Diponegoro (Diponegoro Medical Journal)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/dmj.v13i4.45462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brain tumors are abnormal tissue that grow uncontrolled and affect a patient's neurological function. Brain tumors come in different shapes and characteristics. Moreover, its location also differs for each patient. Brain tumors can be detected using machine learning algorithms using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images. However, a different machine-learning comparison is limited and needs further investigation. This study aims to compare three machine-learning methods, i.e., Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naive Bayes (NB), and Artificial Neural Network Back Propagation (ANN-BP) algorithms for detecting brain tumors. Before the comparison started, MRI image quality was enhanced by performing denoising, histogram equalization, and thresholding. After that, Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix feature extraction was performed. MRI brain images in JPEG format were acquired from an open-access database. One thousand brain tumor and 1000 normal tumor images are used as the training data, while 100 brain tumor and 100 normal tumor images are used as testing data. Each algorithm's accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) are evaluated and reported. The study showed that the SVM algorithm acquired the highest performance in detecting brain tumors, followed by ANN-BP and NB. The highest accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and MCC values for testing in SVM were 98,75%, 98,22%, 99,30%, and 0,9751, respectively. Meanwhile, in testing, the highest accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and MCC values were 90.50%, 98.80%, 82.00%, and 0.8220, respectively. In conclusion, this study showed the superiority of the SVM algorithm in detecting brain tumor compared to ANN-BP and NB by performing image enhancement steps and GLCM feature extraction before its detection.
支持向量机、奈夫贝叶斯和人工神经网络反向传播在检测脑肿瘤方面的比较
脑肿瘤是不受控制生长并影响患者神经功能的异常组织。脑肿瘤的形状和特征各不相同。此外,每位患者的肿瘤位置也不尽相同。脑肿瘤可以通过磁共振成像(MRI)图像使用机器学习算法检测出来。然而,不同机器学习的比较是有限的,需要进一步研究。本研究旨在比较三种机器学习方法,即支持向量机(SVM)、奈夫贝叶斯(NB)和人工神经网络反向传播(ANN-BP)算法,以检测脑肿瘤。在开始比较之前,通过执行去噪、直方图均衡化和阈值化来提高 MRI 图像质量。之后,进行灰度共生矩阵特征提取。JPEG 格式的磁共振成像脑图像是从一个开放数据库中获取的。其中,1000 张脑肿瘤图像和 1000 张正常肿瘤图像作为训练数据,100 张脑肿瘤图像和 100 张正常肿瘤图像作为测试数据。对每种算法的准确度、精确度、灵敏度和马修斯相关系数(MCC)进行了评估和报告。研究表明,SVM 算法在检测脑肿瘤方面的性能最高,其次是 ANN-BP 和 NB。SVM 在测试中的最高准确度、精确度、灵敏度和 MCC 值分别为 98.75%、98.22%、99.30% 和 0.9751。同时,在测试中,最高的准确度、精确度、灵敏度和 MCC 值分别为 90.50%、98.80%、82.00% 和 0.8220。总之,与 ANN-BP 和 NB 相比,本研究通过在检测前进行图像增强步骤和 GLCM 特征提取,显示了 SVM 算法在检测脑肿瘤方面的优越性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信