Compressive Creep Test on Fiber-Reinforced Ultra-High Performance Concrete: Effects of Strain Measuring Method, Specimen Size, Sustained Load Intensity, and Fiber Length

Hyun-Myo Park, Seung-Ryong Ryu, Oh Kyun Kwon, Jun-Mo Yang
{"title":"Compressive Creep Test on Fiber-Reinforced Ultra-High Performance Concrete: Effects of Strain Measuring Method, Specimen Size, Sustained Load Intensity, and Fiber Length","authors":"Hyun-Myo Park, Seung-Ryong Ryu, Oh Kyun Kwon, Jun-Mo Yang","doi":"10.3390/buildings14072136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To solve the difficulties in applying the compressive creep test method for normal concrete to UHPC and to verify the validity of the recently proposed ASTM C 1856 standard test method, this study performed compressive creep tests on UHPC with the variables of specimen size, sustained load intensity, fiber length, and strain measuring method. The experimental results show that the strain meter method using the standard rod had limitations due to the error in the verification process using the standard rod and the observation error of the measurer, and a sustained load intensity of 15% to 40% of the actual compressive strength is preferable. It was found that it is possible to perform a compressive creep test for UHPC using a specimen with a size of ϕ75 mm or more, and the fiber length did not affect the creep behavior of the UHPC up to 19.5 mm. As a result of comparing the UHPC creep test results with the creep prediction model, the B3 model was found to most accurately predict the UHPC creep behavior. The creep coefficient pattern of the B3 model was very similar to the measured results and well reflects the effects of the mixing ratio and compressive strength of UHPC.","PeriodicalId":505657,"journal":{"name":"Buildings","volume":"121 45","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14072136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To solve the difficulties in applying the compressive creep test method for normal concrete to UHPC and to verify the validity of the recently proposed ASTM C 1856 standard test method, this study performed compressive creep tests on UHPC with the variables of specimen size, sustained load intensity, fiber length, and strain measuring method. The experimental results show that the strain meter method using the standard rod had limitations due to the error in the verification process using the standard rod and the observation error of the measurer, and a sustained load intensity of 15% to 40% of the actual compressive strength is preferable. It was found that it is possible to perform a compressive creep test for UHPC using a specimen with a size of ϕ75 mm or more, and the fiber length did not affect the creep behavior of the UHPC up to 19.5 mm. As a result of comparing the UHPC creep test results with the creep prediction model, the B3 model was found to most accurately predict the UHPC creep behavior. The creep coefficient pattern of the B3 model was very similar to the measured results and well reflects the effects of the mixing ratio and compressive strength of UHPC.
纤维增强超高性能混凝土的压缩蠕变试验:应变测量方法、试样尺寸、持续载荷强度和纤维长度的影响
为了解决将普通混凝土抗压徐变试验方法应用于超高强度混凝土的困难,并验证最近提出的 ASTM C 1856 标准试验方法的有效性,本研究对超高强度混凝土进行了抗压徐变试验,试验变量包括试样尺寸、持续荷载强度、纤维长度和应变测量方法。实验结果表明,使用标准杆的应变计方法存在局限性,原因在于使用标准杆的验证过程中存在误差,以及测量人员的观察误差,而持续加载强度最好为实际抗压强度的 15%至 40%。研究发现,使用尺寸为 ϕ75 mm 或更大的试样进行超高性能混凝土的压缩蠕变试验是可行的,而且纤维长度在 19.5 mm 以下不会影响超高性能混凝土的蠕变行为。将 UHPC 蠕变试验结果与蠕变预测模型进行比较后发现,B3 模型能最准确地预测 UHPC 的蠕变行为。B3 模型的蠕变系数模式与测量结果非常相似,很好地反映了混合比和 UHPC 抗压强度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信