Quantifying the Influence of Different Block Types on the Urban Heat Risk in High-Density Cities

Binwei Zou, Chengliang Fan, Jianjun Li
{"title":"Quantifying the Influence of Different Block Types on the Urban Heat Risk in High-Density Cities","authors":"Binwei Zou, Chengliang Fan, Jianjun Li","doi":"10.3390/buildings14072131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urbanization and climate change have led to rising urban temperatures, increasing heat-related health risks. Assessing urban heat risk is crucial for understanding and mitigating these risks. Many studies often overlook the impact of block types on heat risk, which limits the development of mitigation strategies during urban planning. This study aims to investigate the influence of various spatial factors on the heat risk at the block scale. Firstly, a GIS approach was used to generate a Local Climate Zones (LCZ) map, which represents different block types. Secondly, a heat risk assessment model was developed using hazard, exposure, and vulnerability indicators. Thirdly, the risk model was demonstrated in Guangzhou, a high-density city in China, to investigate the distribution of heat risk among different block types. An XGBoost model was used to analyze the impact of various urban spatial factors on heat risk. Results revealed significant variations in heat risk susceptibility among different block types. Specifically, 33.9% of LCZ 1–4 areas were classified as being at a high-risk level, while only 23.8% of LCZ 6–9 areas fell into this level. In addition, the pervious surface fraction (PSF) had the strongest influence on heat risk level, followed by the height of roughness elements (HRE), building surface fraction (BSF), and sky view factor (SVF). SVF and PSF had a negative impact on heat risk, while HRE and BSF had a positive effect. The heat risk assessment model provides valuable insights into the spatial characteristics of heat risk influenced by different urban morphologies. This study will assist in formulating reasonable risk mitigation measures at the planning level in the future.","PeriodicalId":505657,"journal":{"name":"Buildings","volume":"66 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14072131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urbanization and climate change have led to rising urban temperatures, increasing heat-related health risks. Assessing urban heat risk is crucial for understanding and mitigating these risks. Many studies often overlook the impact of block types on heat risk, which limits the development of mitigation strategies during urban planning. This study aims to investigate the influence of various spatial factors on the heat risk at the block scale. Firstly, a GIS approach was used to generate a Local Climate Zones (LCZ) map, which represents different block types. Secondly, a heat risk assessment model was developed using hazard, exposure, and vulnerability indicators. Thirdly, the risk model was demonstrated in Guangzhou, a high-density city in China, to investigate the distribution of heat risk among different block types. An XGBoost model was used to analyze the impact of various urban spatial factors on heat risk. Results revealed significant variations in heat risk susceptibility among different block types. Specifically, 33.9% of LCZ 1–4 areas were classified as being at a high-risk level, while only 23.8% of LCZ 6–9 areas fell into this level. In addition, the pervious surface fraction (PSF) had the strongest influence on heat risk level, followed by the height of roughness elements (HRE), building surface fraction (BSF), and sky view factor (SVF). SVF and PSF had a negative impact on heat risk, while HRE and BSF had a positive effect. The heat risk assessment model provides valuable insights into the spatial characteristics of heat risk influenced by different urban morphologies. This study will assist in formulating reasonable risk mitigation measures at the planning level in the future.
量化不同街区类型对高密度城市热风险的影响
城市化和气候变化导致城市气温上升,增加了与高温有关的健康风险。评估城市热风险对于了解和缓解这些风险至关重要。许多研究往往忽略了街区类型对热风险的影响,这限制了城市规划过程中缓解策略的制定。本研究旨在调查各种空间因素对街区热风险的影响。首先,采用地理信息系统(GIS)方法生成代表不同街区类型的地方气候区(LCZ)地图。其次,利用危害、暴露和脆弱性指标建立了高温风险评估模型。第三,在中国高密度城市广州演示了该风险模型,以调查不同区块类型的热风险分布情况。使用 XGBoost 模型分析了各种城市空间因素对高温风险的影响。结果显示,不同区块类型的热风险易感性存在明显差异。具体而言,33.9% 的 LCZ 1-4 区域被归类为高风险水平,而只有 23.8% 的 LCZ 6-9 区域属于这一水平。此外,透水表面分数(PSF)对热风险等级的影响最大,其次是粗糙度要素高度(HRE)、建筑表面分数(BSF)和天空视线系数(SVF)。SVF 和 PSF 对热风险有负面影响,而 HRE 和 BSF 则有正面影响。热风险评估模型为了解受不同城市形态影响的热风险空间特征提供了宝贵的见解。这项研究将有助于未来在规划层面制定合理的风险缓解措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信