ENGINE—An EHS Project for Future Guidelines

C. Stabilini, Stavros Antoniou, Frederik Berrevoet, Marja Boermeester, Umberto Bracale, A. D. de Beaux, B. East, Hakan Gök, M. López Cano, Filip E. Muysoms, S. Capoccia Giovannini, Maarten Simons
{"title":"ENGINE—An EHS Project for Future Guidelines","authors":"C. Stabilini, Stavros Antoniou, Frederik Berrevoet, Marja Boermeester, Umberto Bracale, A. D. de Beaux, B. East, Hakan Gök, M. López Cano, Filip E. Muysoms, S. Capoccia Giovannini, Maarten Simons","doi":"10.3389/jaws.2024.13007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical guidelines are evidence-based recommendations developed by healthcare organizations or expert panels to assist healthcare providers and patients in making appropriate and reliable decisions regarding specific health conditions, aiming to enhance the quality of healthcare by promoting best practices, reducing variations in care, and at the same time, allowing tailored clinical decision-making. European Hernia Society (EHS) guidelines aim to provide surgeons a reliable set of answers to their pertinent clinical questions and a tool to base their activity as experts in the management of abdominal wall defects. The traditional approach to guideline production is based on gathering key opinion leader in a particular field, to address a number of key questions, appraising papers, presenting evidence and produce final recommendations based on the literature and consensus. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method offers a transparent and structured process for developing and presenting evidence summaries and for carrying out the steps involved in developing recommendations. Its main strength lies in guiding complex judgments that balance the need for simplicity with the requirement for complete and transparent consideration of all important issues. EHS guidelines are of overall good quality but the application of GRADE method, began with EHS guidelines on open abdomen, and the increasing adherence to the process, has greatly improved the reliability of our guidelines. Currently, the need to application of this methodology and the creation of stable and dedicated group of researchers interested in following GRADE in the production of guidelines has been outlined in the literature. Considering that the production of clinical guidelines is a complex process, this paper aim to highlights the primary features of guideline production, GRADE methodology, the challenges associated with their adoption in the field of hernia surgery and the project of the EHS to establish a stable guidelines committee to provide technical and methodological support in update of previously published guideline or the creation of new ones.","PeriodicalId":502716,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Abdominal Wall Surgery","volume":"55 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Abdominal Wall Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/jaws.2024.13007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical guidelines are evidence-based recommendations developed by healthcare organizations or expert panels to assist healthcare providers and patients in making appropriate and reliable decisions regarding specific health conditions, aiming to enhance the quality of healthcare by promoting best practices, reducing variations in care, and at the same time, allowing tailored clinical decision-making. European Hernia Society (EHS) guidelines aim to provide surgeons a reliable set of answers to their pertinent clinical questions and a tool to base their activity as experts in the management of abdominal wall defects. The traditional approach to guideline production is based on gathering key opinion leader in a particular field, to address a number of key questions, appraising papers, presenting evidence and produce final recommendations based on the literature and consensus. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method offers a transparent and structured process for developing and presenting evidence summaries and for carrying out the steps involved in developing recommendations. Its main strength lies in guiding complex judgments that balance the need for simplicity with the requirement for complete and transparent consideration of all important issues. EHS guidelines are of overall good quality but the application of GRADE method, began with EHS guidelines on open abdomen, and the increasing adherence to the process, has greatly improved the reliability of our guidelines. Currently, the need to application of this methodology and the creation of stable and dedicated group of researchers interested in following GRADE in the production of guidelines has been outlined in the literature. Considering that the production of clinical guidelines is a complex process, this paper aim to highlights the primary features of guideline production, GRADE methodology, the challenges associated with their adoption in the field of hernia surgery and the project of the EHS to establish a stable guidelines committee to provide technical and methodological support in update of previously published guideline or the creation of new ones.
工程引擎--未来准则的 EHS 项目
临床指南是由医疗机构或专家小组制定的循证建议,旨在帮助医疗服务提供者和患者就特定的健康状况做出适当、可靠的决定,目的是通过推广最佳实践、减少护理中的差异来提高医疗质量,同时允许量身定制的临床决策。欧洲疝气协会(EHS)指南旨在为外科医生提供一套可靠的临床问题解答,以及作为腹壁缺损治疗专家的基础工具。制定指南的传统方法是召集特定领域的主要意见领袖,以解决一些关键问题、评估论文、提供证据,并根据文献和共识提出最终建议。建议评估、制定和评价分级法(GRADE)为制定和展示证据摘要以及执行制定建议的步骤提供了一个透明、结构化的过程。它的主要优势在于指导复杂的判断,在简明扼要与全面透明地考虑所有重要问题的要求之间取得平衡。EHS 指南的总体质量良好,但从 EHS 开腹指南开始应用 GRADE 方法,并越来越多地遵守这一过程,大大提高了我们指南的可靠性。目前,文献中已经概述了应用该方法的必要性,并建立了稳定而专门的研究小组,有兴趣在编制指南时遵循 GRADE 方法。考虑到临床指南的制定是一个复杂的过程,本文旨在强调指南制定的主要特点、GRADE 方法、在疝外科领域采用该方法所面临的挑战,以及 EHS 建立一个稳定的指南委员会的项目,以便为更新之前发布的指南或制定新指南提供技术和方法上的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信