The Effect of Urbanization on Community Social Networks and Support Systems

Andie Bandile
{"title":"The Effect of Urbanization on Community Social Networks and Support Systems","authors":"Andie Bandile","doi":"10.47941/ijhss.2084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The general objective of this study was to investigate the effect of urbanization on community social networks and support systems. \nMethodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. \nFindings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the effect of urbanization on community social networks and support systems. Preliminary empirical review revealed that urbanization significantly fragmented traditional social networks, leading to isolation and reduced informal support systems. However, it also identified opportunities for developing formal support mechanisms through government services, NGOs, and community-based initiatives, enhanced by technology. The study emphasized the importance of inclusive urban policies and thoughtful design to foster social cohesion, suggesting that intentional planning could build resilient and supportive urban communities, ultimately improving residents' quality of life. \nUnique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Social Capital Theory, Systems Theory and Social Network Theory may be used to anchor future studies on the effect of urbanization on community social networks and support systems. The study recommended integrating social capital, systems, and social network theories into urban studies, prioritizing the creation of communal spaces, and implementing community-based programs to foster social ties. It advocated for policies ensuring equitable access to social infrastructure, preserving cultural practices, and leveraging technology to enhance social connectivity and support services. Additionally, it emphasized building resilient and inclusive communities, addressing social inequalities, and adopting a holistic approach to urban development to mitigate the negative impacts of rapid urbanization.","PeriodicalId":513171,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Humanity and Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Humanity and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47941/ijhss.2084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The general objective of this study was to investigate the effect of urbanization on community social networks and support systems. Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library. Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the effect of urbanization on community social networks and support systems. Preliminary empirical review revealed that urbanization significantly fragmented traditional social networks, leading to isolation and reduced informal support systems. However, it also identified opportunities for developing formal support mechanisms through government services, NGOs, and community-based initiatives, enhanced by technology. The study emphasized the importance of inclusive urban policies and thoughtful design to foster social cohesion, suggesting that intentional planning could build resilient and supportive urban communities, ultimately improving residents' quality of life. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Social Capital Theory, Systems Theory and Social Network Theory may be used to anchor future studies on the effect of urbanization on community social networks and support systems. The study recommended integrating social capital, systems, and social network theories into urban studies, prioritizing the creation of communal spaces, and implementing community-based programs to foster social ties. It advocated for policies ensuring equitable access to social infrastructure, preserving cultural practices, and leveraging technology to enhance social connectivity and support services. Additionally, it emphasized building resilient and inclusive communities, addressing social inequalities, and adopting a holistic approach to urban development to mitigate the negative impacts of rapid urbanization.
城市化对社区社会网络和支持系统的影响
目的:本研究的总体目标是调查城市化对社区社会网络和支持系统的影响。研究方法:本研究采用案头研究方法。案头研究指的是二手数据或无需实地考察即可收集到的数据。案头研究基本上是从现有资源中收集数据,因此与实地研究相比,案头研究通常被认为是一种低成本技术,因为主要成本涉及执行人员的时间、电话费和目录。因此,本研究依赖于已出版的研究、报告和统计数据。这些二手数据可通过在线期刊和图书馆轻松获取。研究结果:研究结果表明,在城市化对社区社会网络和支持系统的影响方面存在背景和方法上的差距。初步的实证审查显示,城市化极大地割裂了传统的社会网络,导致孤立和非正式支持系统的减少。不过,研究也发现了通过政府服务、非政府组织和以社区为基础的倡议发展正式支持机制的机会,并通过技术加以强化。研究强调了包容性城市政策和深思熟虑的设计对促进社会凝聚力的重要性,表明有意识的规划可以建设具有弹性和支持性的城市社区,最终提高居民的生活质量。对理论、实践和政策的独特贡献:社会资本理论、系统理论和社会网络理论可用于今后有关城市化对社区社会网络和支持系统影响的研究。研究建议将社会资本理论、系统理论和社会网络理论纳入城市研究,优先考虑创建公共空间,并实施基于社区的计划来促进社会联系。研究提倡制定政策,确保公平使用社会基础设施,保护文化习俗,利用技术加强社会联系和支持服务。此外,它还强调建设具有复原力和包容性的社区,解决社会不平等问题,并对城市发展采取综合方法,以减轻快速城市化带来的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信