A submerged draw down test calibration method for fully-coupled CFD-DEM modelling

Jacob G. Wasserfall, C.J. Coetzee, Chris J. Meyer
{"title":"A submerged draw down test calibration method for fully-coupled CFD-DEM modelling","authors":"Jacob G. Wasserfall, C.J. Coetzee, Chris J. Meyer","doi":"10.3389/fceng.2024.1376974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A fully coupled computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and discrete element method (DEM) model was calibrated using a draw down test (DDT) under submerged conditions. Momentum smoothing and cell clustering were used to model particles that were larger than the cells. The DEM input parameter values were initially set equal to those calibrated for the dry conditions. Under submerged conditions, results showed that the particle-particle coefficient of friction and the drag modifier had an influence on the results. It was found that the drag modifier had to be calibrated, while the particle-particle coefficient of friction, calibrated under dry conditions, could be used for the submerged conditions. A vertical suction pipe validation experiment was conducted. The suction pipe had a constant diameter, but the fluid velocity and the distance the pipe opening was held from the granular bed were varied. The amount of mass (particles) removed as well as the size of the cavity that formed in the material bed were measured and compared to model predictions. The results showed that using the parameter values calibrated in the DDT, too much material was removed (error of 30%). Removing the drag modifier (setting it equal to unity) significantly improved the results (error of 6%). It is concluded that due to the difference in flow mechanism (particle-induced in the DDT versus fluid-induced in the suction pipe), the DDT is not a suitable experiment to calibrate the input parameter values for a suction pipe. It is proposed that the flow mechanism and dynamics of the granular material and the fluid in the calibration experiment should be similar to that of the final application being investigated.","PeriodicalId":510140,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Chemical Engineering","volume":"39 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fceng.2024.1376974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A fully coupled computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and discrete element method (DEM) model was calibrated using a draw down test (DDT) under submerged conditions. Momentum smoothing and cell clustering were used to model particles that were larger than the cells. The DEM input parameter values were initially set equal to those calibrated for the dry conditions. Under submerged conditions, results showed that the particle-particle coefficient of friction and the drag modifier had an influence on the results. It was found that the drag modifier had to be calibrated, while the particle-particle coefficient of friction, calibrated under dry conditions, could be used for the submerged conditions. A vertical suction pipe validation experiment was conducted. The suction pipe had a constant diameter, but the fluid velocity and the distance the pipe opening was held from the granular bed were varied. The amount of mass (particles) removed as well as the size of the cavity that formed in the material bed were measured and compared to model predictions. The results showed that using the parameter values calibrated in the DDT, too much material was removed (error of 30%). Removing the drag modifier (setting it equal to unity) significantly improved the results (error of 6%). It is concluded that due to the difference in flow mechanism (particle-induced in the DDT versus fluid-induced in the suction pipe), the DDT is not a suitable experiment to calibrate the input parameter values for a suction pipe. It is proposed that the flow mechanism and dynamics of the granular material and the fluid in the calibration experiment should be similar to that of the final application being investigated.
用于全耦合 CFD-DEM 建模的浸没式下拉试验校准方法
在水下条件下,使用拉伸试验(DDT)对完全耦合的计算流体动力学(CFD)和离散元素法(DEM)模型进行了校准。动量平滑和单元聚类用于模拟比单元大的颗粒。DEM 输入参数值最初设置为与在干燥条件下校准的参数值相同。在浸没条件下,结果表明颗粒与颗粒之间的摩擦系数和阻力修正器对结果有影响。结果发现,阻力修正器必须进行校准,而在干燥条件下校准的颗粒-颗粒摩擦系数可用于水下条件。进行了垂直吸管验证实验。吸管的直径恒定,但流体速度和管口与颗粒床的距离各不相同。测量了去除的质量(颗粒)以及在材料床中形成的空腔大小,并与模型预测进行了比较。结果表明,使用 DDT 中校准的参数值,去除的材料过多(误差为 30%)。去除阻力修正器(将其设置为零)后,结果有了明显改善(误差为 6%)。得出的结论是,由于流动机制的不同(在 DDT 中由颗粒引起的流动与在吸入管中由流体引起的流动),DDT 并不是校准吸入管输入参数值的合适实验。建议校准实验中颗粒材料和流体的流动机制和动态应与最终研究的应用类似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信