Community-engaged co-design of a quality improvement capacity building program within an integrated health system in Ontario, Canada

IF 0.8 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Leahora Rotteau, Mercedes Magaz, Brian M. Wong, Sara Shearkhani, Mohammad Shabani, Rishma Pradhan, Bourne Auguste, Laurie Bourne, Jeff Powis, K. Smith
{"title":"Community-engaged co-design of a quality improvement capacity building program within an integrated health system in Ontario, Canada","authors":"Leahora Rotteau, Mercedes Magaz, Brian M. Wong, Sara Shearkhani, Mohammad Shabani, Rishma Pradhan, Bourne Auguste, Laurie Bourne, Jeff Powis, K. Smith","doi":"10.1108/jica-05-2023-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeAn integrated care system identified quality improvement (QI) capacity as a gap in advancing their integrated quality care priorities and improvement efforts. Here we describe the design and implementation of a QI capacity building program that aimed to (1) build QI capacity amongst diverse integrated care system members and (2) apply QI principles to advance integrated quality care priorities.Design/methodology/approachThe integrated care system leaders, including community members, partnered with the University of Toronto Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety to co-design and deliver the QI capacity building program focused on improving cancer screening rates. An existing acute care capacity building program was adapted. Content included QI tools, data to identify and monitor QI priorities, equity considerations, and empowering participants as change agents.FindingsParticipants were satisfied with the content and delivery of the program. Some described using QI tools and strategies in practice following the workshop. Challenges to using the tools included the current pressures facing primary care and the health system, resources, and data availability.Practical implicationsThis QI capacity building program was challenging but feasible. Clarifying the target audience, being attentive to co-design, acknowledging post-pandemic system challenges and proactively addressing variable knowledge and barriers to QI work in practice will inform future iterations of this program.Originality/valueWhile many examples of QI education programs exist, the majority target a single healthcare sector. We describe a novel QI capacity building model that bridges healthcare sectors and includes patient partners and community members as teachers and participants.","PeriodicalId":51837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrated Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jica-05-2023-0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeAn integrated care system identified quality improvement (QI) capacity as a gap in advancing their integrated quality care priorities and improvement efforts. Here we describe the design and implementation of a QI capacity building program that aimed to (1) build QI capacity amongst diverse integrated care system members and (2) apply QI principles to advance integrated quality care priorities.Design/methodology/approachThe integrated care system leaders, including community members, partnered with the University of Toronto Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety to co-design and deliver the QI capacity building program focused on improving cancer screening rates. An existing acute care capacity building program was adapted. Content included QI tools, data to identify and monitor QI priorities, equity considerations, and empowering participants as change agents.FindingsParticipants were satisfied with the content and delivery of the program. Some described using QI tools and strategies in practice following the workshop. Challenges to using the tools included the current pressures facing primary care and the health system, resources, and data availability.Practical implicationsThis QI capacity building program was challenging but feasible. Clarifying the target audience, being attentive to co-design, acknowledging post-pandemic system challenges and proactively addressing variable knowledge and barriers to QI work in practice will inform future iterations of this program.Originality/valueWhile many examples of QI education programs exist, the majority target a single healthcare sector. We describe a novel QI capacity building model that bridges healthcare sectors and includes patient partners and community members as teachers and participants.
在加拿大安大略省的综合医疗系统内,由社区参与共同设计质量改进能力建设计划
目的 一家综合医疗系统认为,质量改进(QI)能力是推进其综合优质医疗优先事项和改进工作的一个缺口。设计/方法/途径包括社区成员在内的综合医疗系统领导者与多伦多大学质量改进和患者安全中心合作,共同设计并实施了以提高癌症筛查率为重点的质量改进能力建设项目。对现有的急症护理能力建设计划进行了调整。内容包括质量改进工具、确定和监控质量改进优先事项的数据、公平考虑因素以及增强参与者作为变革推动者的能力。一些学员介绍说,研讨会结束后,他们在实践中使用了 QI 工具和策略。使用这些工具所面临的挑战包括初级医疗和医疗系统当前面临的压力、资源和数据可用性。明确目标受众、关注共同设计、认识到大流行后的系统挑战以及积极主动地解决实践中存在的知识差异和QI工作障碍,这些都将为该计划未来的迭代提供参考。 原创性/价值虽然有很多QI教育计划的例子,但大多数都是针对单一的医疗保健部门。我们介绍了一种新颖的 QI 能力建设模式,它在医疗保健部门之间架起了桥梁,并将患者合作伙伴和社区成员作为教师和参与者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Integrated Care
Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信