Kristy Baron, Melissa NeVille Norton, Diane Leggett-Fife, K. Trump
{"title":"Supporting graduate students’ skills with simulated experiences in a professional foundation course","authors":"Kristy Baron, Melissa NeVille Norton, Diane Leggett-Fife, K. Trump","doi":"10.5430/jnep.v14n11p14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The population’s health depends on a well-educated nursing workforce that includes graduate-prepared nurses. However, the nation’s demand for graduate nurses in advanced practice, teaching, and research roles surpasses the supply. Graduate nursing educators can support student success by creating positive learning experiences for students at the beginning of their study programs. Initially, we created a pilot writing orientation, which was implemented for new students. Although the results of the pilot study showed significance with paired t-tests (p < .000; Cohen’s d = 1.21), the writing skills were not applied in long-term coursework. Therefore, a seven-week course was created to provide students with small-scale assignments, preparing them for complex future graduate coursework. The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the skills learned in the course using student (n = 15) and faculty (n = 9) focus groups. A qualitative design using thematic analysis showed the following student themes: tools to improve scholarly writing, magnitude and feasibility of the project, graduate-level writing and professional presentations, clear expectations of achieving program requirements, and professional development using a digital e-portfolio. Faculty focus groups compared the skills of students who had completed the course and those who had not. Faculty themes included stronger writing skills despite the variation, resource availability, tool use, APA format skills, and writing synthesis skills development. Overall, the participants’ perspectives shared positive feedback with insightful suggestions for future course improvement.","PeriodicalId":73866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing education and practice","volume":"51 39","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing education and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v14n11p14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The population’s health depends on a well-educated nursing workforce that includes graduate-prepared nurses. However, the nation’s demand for graduate nurses in advanced practice, teaching, and research roles surpasses the supply. Graduate nursing educators can support student success by creating positive learning experiences for students at the beginning of their study programs. Initially, we created a pilot writing orientation, which was implemented for new students. Although the results of the pilot study showed significance with paired t-tests (p < .000; Cohen’s d = 1.21), the writing skills were not applied in long-term coursework. Therefore, a seven-week course was created to provide students with small-scale assignments, preparing them for complex future graduate coursework. The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the skills learned in the course using student (n = 15) and faculty (n = 9) focus groups. A qualitative design using thematic analysis showed the following student themes: tools to improve scholarly writing, magnitude and feasibility of the project, graduate-level writing and professional presentations, clear expectations of achieving program requirements, and professional development using a digital e-portfolio. Faculty focus groups compared the skills of students who had completed the course and those who had not. Faculty themes included stronger writing skills despite the variation, resource availability, tool use, APA format skills, and writing synthesis skills development. Overall, the participants’ perspectives shared positive feedback with insightful suggestions for future course improvement.