What can we learn from disability policy to advance our understanding of how to operationalise intersectionality in Australian policy frameworks?

IF 2.1 4区 管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Shona Bates, Rosemary Kayess, Ilan Katz
{"title":"What can we learn from disability policy to advance our understanding of how to operationalise intersectionality in Australian policy frameworks?","authors":"Shona Bates, Rosemary Kayess, Ilan Katz","doi":"10.1111/1467-8500.12648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intersectional theory recognises inequity is rarely the result of one social identity; social identities, and their interaction with context and power relations, offer some protective factors, while marginalises others. Taking an intersectional approach to social policy has the potential to provide deeper insights in terms of identifying and responding to needs, and understanding the impact of policies and specific interventions for diverse people. While Australian social policies, such as national strategies, are beginning to recognise inequity is likely to be higher for some social identities than others, a recent review of Australian policy and how it responds to people with disability suggests policies do not yet appear to take an intersectional approach. Drawing on this review, we discuss the challenges in operationalising intersectionality, explore how they may be overcome, and identify considerations for scholars and future research opportunities to advance our understanding of how to operationalise intersectionality in social policy in Australia. We suggest intersectionality requires a broader cultural shift across society and professions to recognise people have multiple identities, statuses, and life circumstances, and the way they interact with the context and power relations affects how they experience life.\nIntersectionality recognises the interaction between social identities, context, and power relations.\nThe research note aims to advance our understanding of how to operationalise intersectionality in Australian social policy.\nThis note builds on a review of Australian policy frameworks and whether they take an intersectional approach to addressing disability.\nThe research note identifies considerations for researchers and research opportunities.\nA broader cultural shift across society is required to recognise how different factors affect how people experience life.\n","PeriodicalId":47373,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12648","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intersectional theory recognises inequity is rarely the result of one social identity; social identities, and their interaction with context and power relations, offer some protective factors, while marginalises others. Taking an intersectional approach to social policy has the potential to provide deeper insights in terms of identifying and responding to needs, and understanding the impact of policies and specific interventions for diverse people. While Australian social policies, such as national strategies, are beginning to recognise inequity is likely to be higher for some social identities than others, a recent review of Australian policy and how it responds to people with disability suggests policies do not yet appear to take an intersectional approach. Drawing on this review, we discuss the challenges in operationalising intersectionality, explore how they may be overcome, and identify considerations for scholars and future research opportunities to advance our understanding of how to operationalise intersectionality in social policy in Australia. We suggest intersectionality requires a broader cultural shift across society and professions to recognise people have multiple identities, statuses, and life circumstances, and the way they interact with the context and power relations affects how they experience life. Intersectionality recognises the interaction between social identities, context, and power relations. The research note aims to advance our understanding of how to operationalise intersectionality in Australian social policy. This note builds on a review of Australian policy frameworks and whether they take an intersectional approach to addressing disability. The research note identifies considerations for researchers and research opportunities. A broader cultural shift across society is required to recognise how different factors affect how people experience life.
我们可以从残疾人政策中学到什么,以促进我们对如何在澳大利亚政策框架中实现交叉性的理解?
交叉理论认为,不平等很少是一种社会身份造成的;社会身份及其与环境和权力关系的互动,提供了一些保护因素,同时也使另一些因素边缘化。对社会政策采取交叉方法,有可能在确定和应对需求,以及了解政策和具体干预措施对不同人群的影响方面提供更深入的见解。虽然澳大利亚的社会政策(如国家战略)已开始认识到,某些社会身份的不平等程度可能会高于其他社会身份,但最近对澳大利亚政策及其如何应对残疾人问题的审查表明,政策似乎尚未采取交叉方法。借鉴这一回顾,我们讨论了实施交叉性所面临的挑战,探讨了如何克服这些挑战,并确定了学者的注意事项和未来的研究机会,以推进我们对如何在澳大利亚社会政策中实施交叉性的理解。我们认为,交叉性要求整个社会和行业进行更广泛的文化转变,以认识到人们具有多重身份、地位和生活环境,而他们与环境和权力关系的互动方式会影响他们的生活体验。本研究说明旨在促进我们对如何在澳大利亚社会政策中实施交叉性的理解。本研究说明基于对澳大利亚政策框架及其是否采取交叉性方法来解决残疾问题的审查,确定了研究人员的注意事项和研究机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Aimed at a diverse readership, the Australian Journal of Public Administration is committed to the study and practice of public administration, public management and policy making. It encourages research, reflection and commentary amongst those interested in a range of public sector settings - federal, state, local and inter-governmental. The journal focuses on Australian concerns, but welcomes manuscripts relating to international developments of relevance to Australian experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信