Prognostic value of immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer based on baseline and dynamic changes in hemoglobin, albumin, and platelets

Hui Su, Chao Yu, Guiming Sun, Baozhong Wang, Yingjie Gao, Xiaolan Liu, Qingcui Song, Xuezhen Ma
{"title":"Prognostic value of immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer based on baseline and dynamic changes in hemoglobin, albumin, and platelets","authors":"Hui Su, Chao Yu, Guiming Sun, Baozhong Wang, Yingjie Gao, Xiaolan Liu, Qingcui Song, Xuezhen Ma","doi":"10.17305/bb.2024.10833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Immune checkpoint inhibitors enhance the tumor-killing ability of T-cells in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), thereby boosting overall survival (OS) and transforming treatment for advanced stages. However, challenges persist, including low response rates and the absence of effective markers for candidate selection. This study evaluated the impact of hemoglobin, albumin, and platelet (HALP), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) on immunotherapy efficacy and survival in advanced NSCLC. Furthermore, the study aimed to develop a nomogram based on these parameters. Clinical and hematological data from patients diagnosed with NSCLC who received immunotherapy were analyzed. Efficacy was assessed using the immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (iRECIST), and progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were analyzed. Prediction models were based on baseline and post-treatment HALP, NLR, and PLR. The 203 included patients had a median follow-up of 16 months, a median PFS (mPFS) of 7 months (6.0 – 8.0), while the median OS (mOS) was not available (24.0 – not available). The PLR before treatment (PLR0) was linked to a higher disease control rate (DCR) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.258), while initial immunotherapy and NLR after four cycles of treatment (NLR4C) significantly boosted the objective response rate (ORR). Cox regression showed that HALP before treatment (HALP0), HALP after four cycles of treatment (HALP4C), and NLR before treatment (NLR0) significantly influenced PFS. Additionally, HALP0, NLR0, and PLR after four cycles of treatment (PLR4C) were associated with OS. The C-indices for PFS and OS were 0.823 and 0.878, respectively, indicating good prediction accuracy. HALP, NLR, and PLR at various time points effectively predicted immunotherapy response in advanced NSCLC patients. Low HALP with high NLR and PLR indicated a poor prognosis. The findings can provide the basis for stratified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the future.","PeriodicalId":504577,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecules and Biomedicine","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecules and Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17305/bb.2024.10833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors enhance the tumor-killing ability of T-cells in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), thereby boosting overall survival (OS) and transforming treatment for advanced stages. However, challenges persist, including low response rates and the absence of effective markers for candidate selection. This study evaluated the impact of hemoglobin, albumin, and platelet (HALP), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) on immunotherapy efficacy and survival in advanced NSCLC. Furthermore, the study aimed to develop a nomogram based on these parameters. Clinical and hematological data from patients diagnosed with NSCLC who received immunotherapy were analyzed. Efficacy was assessed using the immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (iRECIST), and progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were analyzed. Prediction models were based on baseline and post-treatment HALP, NLR, and PLR. The 203 included patients had a median follow-up of 16 months, a median PFS (mPFS) of 7 months (6.0 – 8.0), while the median OS (mOS) was not available (24.0 – not available). The PLR before treatment (PLR0) was linked to a higher disease control rate (DCR) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.258), while initial immunotherapy and NLR after four cycles of treatment (NLR4C) significantly boosted the objective response rate (ORR). Cox regression showed that HALP before treatment (HALP0), HALP after four cycles of treatment (HALP4C), and NLR before treatment (NLR0) significantly influenced PFS. Additionally, HALP0, NLR0, and PLR after four cycles of treatment (PLR4C) were associated with OS. The C-indices for PFS and OS were 0.823 and 0.878, respectively, indicating good prediction accuracy. HALP, NLR, and PLR at various time points effectively predicted immunotherapy response in advanced NSCLC patients. Low HALP with high NLR and PLR indicated a poor prognosis. The findings can provide the basis for stratified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the future.
基于血红蛋白、白蛋白和血小板的基线和动态变化的晚期非小细胞肺癌免疫疗法的预后价值
免疫检查点抑制剂能增强T细胞对非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)肿瘤的杀伤能力,从而提高总生存率(OS)并改变晚期治疗方法。然而,挑战依然存在,包括低应答率和缺乏有效的候选标记物。本研究评估了血红蛋白、白蛋白和血小板(HALP)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)对晚期NSCLC免疫疗法疗效和生存率的影响。此外,该研究还旨在根据这些参数制定一个提名图。研究分析了接受免疫疗法的 NSCLC 患者的临床和血液学数据。使用实体瘤免疫反应评估标准(iRECIST)评估疗效,分析无进展生存期(PFS)和OS。预测模型基于基线和治疗后HALP、NLR和PLR。203例纳入患者的中位随访时间为16个月,中位PFS(mPFS)为7个月(6.0 - 8.0),而中位OS(mOS)不详(24.0 - 不详)。治疗前的PLR(PLR0)与较高的疾病控制率(DCR)相关(比值比 [OR] = 0.258),而初始免疫疗法和四个周期治疗后的NLR(NLR4C)则显著提高了客观反应率(ORR)。Cox回归显示,治疗前的HALP(HALP0)、四个周期治疗后的HALP(HALP4C)和治疗前的NLR(NLR0)对PFS有明显影响。此外,HALP0、NLR0 和四个治疗周期后的 PLR(PLR4C)与 OS 相关。PFS和OS的C指数分别为0.823和0.878,表明预测准确性良好。不同时间点的HALP、NLR和PLR能有效预测晚期NSCLC患者的免疫治疗反应。低HALP、高NLR和PLR表明预后较差。这些发现可为今后的分层随机对照试验(RCT)提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信