Joint Component Estimation for Electricity Price Forecasting Using Functional Models

Energies Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.3390/en17143461
Francesco Lisi, Ismail Shah
{"title":"Joint Component Estimation for Electricity Price Forecasting Using Functional Models","authors":"Francesco Lisi, Ismail Shah","doi":"10.3390/en17143461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work considers the issue of modeling and forecasting electricity prices within the functional time series approach. As this is often performed by estimating and predicting the different components of the price dynamics, we study whether jointly modeling the components, able to account for their inter-relations, could improve prediction with respect to a separate instance of modeling. To investigate this issue, we consider and compare the predictive performance of four different predictors. The first two, namely Smoothing Splines-Seasonal Autoregressive (SS-SAR) and Smoothing Splines-Functional Autoregressive (SS-FAR) are based on separate modeling while the third one is derived from a single-step procedure that jointly estimates all the components by suitably including exogenous variables. It is called Functional Autoregressive with eXogenous variables (FARX) model. The fourth one is a combination of the SS-FAR and FARX predictors. The predictive performances of the models are tested using electricity price data from the northern zone of the Italian electricity market (IPEX), both in terms of forecasting error indicators (MAE, MAPE and RMSE) and by means of the Diebold and Mariano test. The results point out that jointly estimating the components leads to significantly more accurate predictions than using a separate instance of modeling. In particular, the MAE, MAPE, and RMSE values for the best predictor, based on the FARX(3,0,4) model, are 4.25, 9.28, and 5.38, respectively. The percentage error reduction is about 20% with respect to SS-SAR(3,1) and about 10% with respect to SS-FAR(5). Finally, this study suggests that the forecasting errors are generally higher on Sunday and Monday, from hours 3 to 6 in the morning and 14 to 15 in the afternoon, and in June and December. On the other hand, prices are relatively lower on Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday, from hour 20 to 1 a.m., and in January and February.","PeriodicalId":504870,"journal":{"name":"Energies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/en17143461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work considers the issue of modeling and forecasting electricity prices within the functional time series approach. As this is often performed by estimating and predicting the different components of the price dynamics, we study whether jointly modeling the components, able to account for their inter-relations, could improve prediction with respect to a separate instance of modeling. To investigate this issue, we consider and compare the predictive performance of four different predictors. The first two, namely Smoothing Splines-Seasonal Autoregressive (SS-SAR) and Smoothing Splines-Functional Autoregressive (SS-FAR) are based on separate modeling while the third one is derived from a single-step procedure that jointly estimates all the components by suitably including exogenous variables. It is called Functional Autoregressive with eXogenous variables (FARX) model. The fourth one is a combination of the SS-FAR and FARX predictors. The predictive performances of the models are tested using electricity price data from the northern zone of the Italian electricity market (IPEX), both in terms of forecasting error indicators (MAE, MAPE and RMSE) and by means of the Diebold and Mariano test. The results point out that jointly estimating the components leads to significantly more accurate predictions than using a separate instance of modeling. In particular, the MAE, MAPE, and RMSE values for the best predictor, based on the FARX(3,0,4) model, are 4.25, 9.28, and 5.38, respectively. The percentage error reduction is about 20% with respect to SS-SAR(3,1) and about 10% with respect to SS-FAR(5). Finally, this study suggests that the forecasting errors are generally higher on Sunday and Monday, from hours 3 to 6 in the morning and 14 to 15 in the afternoon, and in June and December. On the other hand, prices are relatively lower on Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday, from hour 20 to 1 a.m., and in January and February.
利用函数模型进行电价预测的联合成分估计
这项研究考虑了在函数时间序列方法中对电价进行建模和预测的问题。由于这通常是通过估计和预测价格动态的不同组成部分来实现的,因此我们研究了对这些组成部分进行联合建模(能够考虑到它们之间的相互关系)是否能比单独建模改善预测效果。为了研究这个问题,我们考虑并比较了四种不同预测因子的预测性能。前两个预测因子,即平滑样条-季节自回归(SS-SAR)和平滑样条-功能自回归(SS-FAR)是基于单独建模的,而第三个预测因子则是通过适当加入外生变量,采用单步程序联合估计所有成分得出的。这就是功能自回归与外生变量(FARX)模型。第四个模型是 SS-FAR 和 FARX 预测模型的组合。利用意大利电力市场(IPEX)北部地区的电价数据,通过预测误差指标(MAE、MAPE 和 RMSE)以及 Diebold 和 Mariano 检验,检验了这些模型的预测性能。结果表明,与使用单独的建模实例相比,联合估计各组成部分可获得更准确的预测结果。其中,基于 FARX(3,0,4) 模型的最佳预测器的 MAE、MAPE 和 RMSE 值分别为 4.25、9.28 和 5.38。与 SS-SAR(3,1)相比,误差减少了约 20%,与 SS-FAR(5)相比,误差减少了约 10%。最后,这项研究表明,在周日和周一、上午 3 时至 6 时、下午 14 时至 15 时以及 6 月和 12 月,预测误差普遍较高。另一方面,周三、周四和周五,从 20 点到凌晨 1 点,以及 1 月和 2 月,价格相对较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信