Probabilistic assessment of postfire debris-flow inundation in response to forecast rainfall

Alexander B. Prescott, Luke A. McGuire, Kwang-Sung Jun, K. Barnhart, N. Oakley
{"title":"Probabilistic assessment of postfire debris-flow inundation in response to forecast rainfall","authors":"Alexander B. Prescott, Luke A. McGuire, Kwang-Sung Jun, K. Barnhart, N. Oakley","doi":"10.5194/nhess-24-2359-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Communities downstream of burned steep lands face increases in debris-flow hazards due to fire effects on soil and vegetation. Rapid postfire hazard assessments have traditionally focused on quantifying spatial variations in debris-flow likelihood and volume in response to design rainstorms. However, a methodology that provides estimates of debris-flow inundation downstream of burned areas based on forecast rainfall would provide decision-makers with information that directly addresses the potential for downstream impacts. We introduce a framework that integrates a 24 h lead-time ensemble precipitation forecast with debris-flow likelihood, volume, and runout models to produce probabilistic maps of debris-flow inundation. We applied this framework to simulate debris-flow inundation associated with the 9 January 2018 debris-flow event in Montecito, California, USA. When the observed debris-flow volumes were used to drive the probabilistic forecast model, analysis of the simulated inundation probabilities demonstrates that the model is both reliable and sharp. In the fully predictive model, however, in which debris-flow likelihood and volume were computed from the atmospheric model ensemble's predictions of peak 15 min rainfall intensity, I15, the model generally under-forecasted the inundation area. The observed peak I15 lies in the upper tail of the atmospheric model ensemble spread; thus a large fraction of ensemble members forecast lower I15 than observed. Using these I15 values as input to the inundation model resulted in lower-than-observed flow volumes which translated into under-forecasting of the inundation area. Even so, approximately 94 % of the observed inundated area was forecast to have an inundation probability greater than 1 %, demonstrating that the observed extent of inundation was generally captured within the range of outcomes predicted by the model. Sensitivity analyses indicate that debris-flow volume and two parameters associated with debris-flow mobility exert significant influence on inundation predictions, but reducing uncertainty in postfire debris-flow volume predictions will have the largest impact on reducing inundation outcome uncertainty. This study represents a first step toward a near-real-time hazard assessment product that includes probabilistic estimates of debris-flow inundation and provides guidance for future improvements to this and similar model frameworks by identifying key sources of uncertainty.\n","PeriodicalId":508073,"journal":{"name":"Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences","volume":"36 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2359-2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Communities downstream of burned steep lands face increases in debris-flow hazards due to fire effects on soil and vegetation. Rapid postfire hazard assessments have traditionally focused on quantifying spatial variations in debris-flow likelihood and volume in response to design rainstorms. However, a methodology that provides estimates of debris-flow inundation downstream of burned areas based on forecast rainfall would provide decision-makers with information that directly addresses the potential for downstream impacts. We introduce a framework that integrates a 24 h lead-time ensemble precipitation forecast with debris-flow likelihood, volume, and runout models to produce probabilistic maps of debris-flow inundation. We applied this framework to simulate debris-flow inundation associated with the 9 January 2018 debris-flow event in Montecito, California, USA. When the observed debris-flow volumes were used to drive the probabilistic forecast model, analysis of the simulated inundation probabilities demonstrates that the model is both reliable and sharp. In the fully predictive model, however, in which debris-flow likelihood and volume were computed from the atmospheric model ensemble's predictions of peak 15 min rainfall intensity, I15, the model generally under-forecasted the inundation area. The observed peak I15 lies in the upper tail of the atmospheric model ensemble spread; thus a large fraction of ensemble members forecast lower I15 than observed. Using these I15 values as input to the inundation model resulted in lower-than-observed flow volumes which translated into under-forecasting of the inundation area. Even so, approximately 94 % of the observed inundated area was forecast to have an inundation probability greater than 1 %, demonstrating that the observed extent of inundation was generally captured within the range of outcomes predicted by the model. Sensitivity analyses indicate that debris-flow volume and two parameters associated with debris-flow mobility exert significant influence on inundation predictions, but reducing uncertainty in postfire debris-flow volume predictions will have the largest impact on reducing inundation outcome uncertainty. This study represents a first step toward a near-real-time hazard assessment product that includes probabilistic estimates of debris-flow inundation and provides guidance for future improvements to this and similar model frameworks by identifying key sources of uncertainty.
根据预测降雨量对火灾后泥石流淹没的概率评估
摘要由于火灾对土壤和植被的影响,被烧毁的陡坡地下游社区面临着泥石流危害的增加。传统上,火灾后的快速危害评估主要集中在对泥石流发生的可能性和泥石流量的空间变化进行量化,以应对设计暴雨。但是,如果能根据预测降雨量对燃烧区域下游的泥石流淹没情况进行估算,就能为决策者提供直接应对下游潜在影响的信息。我们介绍了一个框架,该框架将 24 小时前的降水预报集合与泥石流可能性、流量和径流模型相结合,生成泥石流淹没概率图。我们应用该框架模拟了与 2018 年 1 月 9 日美国加利福尼亚州蒙特西托泥石流事件相关的泥石流淹没情况。当观测到的泥石流量被用于驱动概率预测模型时,对模拟淹没概率的分析表明该模型既可靠又敏锐。然而,在完全预测模型中,即根据大气模型集合对 15 分钟峰值降雨强度 I15 的预测计算泥石流可能性和流量时,模型对淹没区域的预测普遍偏低。观测到的峰值 I15 位于大气模式集合分布的上端;因此,很大一部分集合成员预测的 I15 比观测到的要低。将这些 I15 值作为淹没模型的输入,会导致流量低于观测值,从而导致对淹没区的预测不足。即便如此,在观测到的淹没区域中,仍有约 94% 的区域被预测为淹没概率大于 1%,这表明观测到的淹没范围总体上在模型预测的结果范围内。敏感性分析表明,泥石流量和与泥石流流动性相关的两个参数对淹没预测有重大影响,但减少火灾后泥石流量预测的不确定性对减少淹没结果的不确定性影响最大。这项研究是向包括泥石流淹没概率估计在内的近实时危害评估产品迈出的第一步,并通过确定不确定性的关键来源,为今后改进该模型框架及类似模型框架提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信