Molecular tools of antibiotic resistance for Helicobacter pylori: an overview in Latin America

Monica Contreras, Heisser Mujica, M. García-Amado
{"title":"Molecular tools of antibiotic resistance for Helicobacter pylori: an overview in Latin America","authors":"Monica Contreras, Heisser Mujica, M. García-Amado","doi":"10.3389/fgstr.2024.1410816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antibiotic resistance in the treatment of H. pylori infection is the principal reason for the failure of eradication regimens using the triple therapy. We reviewed the mechanisms of H. pylori antibiotic resistance and assessed the molecular tools commonly used to detect antibiotic resistance in Latin America. Most commonly reported molecular techniques were PCR and sequencing, as well as its variants PCR-RFLP and qPCR to detect the genes and mutations involved in the resistance to clarithromycin (CLR), amoxicillin (AMX), levofloxacin (LVX), tetracycline (TET), and metronidazole (MTZ). The mutation-associated resistance rates varied from 2.2% to 83.3% for CLA and 12% to 100% for LVX in 7 and 4 countries, respectively, whereas for MTZ the resistance frequency was between 50% to 100% in 4 countries. For TET and AMX, frequency of the resistance was in the range of 0% to 27% (5 and 3 countries, respectively). Molecular tools can be used for the rapid detection of resistance to CLR, LVX, and TET, whereas genotypic analysis is not appropriate to detect resistance to AMX and MTZ due to genomic changes found in the rdxA and pbp1A genes. The revision of the different molecular methods showed that qPCR and RFLP are the best tools to detect the resistance of H. pylori. Few molecular tools have been developed in Latin America to detect H. pylori resistance to antibiotics. More studies would be needed to understand better efficient strategies to prevent further emergence of antimicrobial resistance.","PeriodicalId":512079,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Gastroenterology","volume":"36 50","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgstr.2024.1410816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance in the treatment of H. pylori infection is the principal reason for the failure of eradication regimens using the triple therapy. We reviewed the mechanisms of H. pylori antibiotic resistance and assessed the molecular tools commonly used to detect antibiotic resistance in Latin America. Most commonly reported molecular techniques were PCR and sequencing, as well as its variants PCR-RFLP and qPCR to detect the genes and mutations involved in the resistance to clarithromycin (CLR), amoxicillin (AMX), levofloxacin (LVX), tetracycline (TET), and metronidazole (MTZ). The mutation-associated resistance rates varied from 2.2% to 83.3% for CLA and 12% to 100% for LVX in 7 and 4 countries, respectively, whereas for MTZ the resistance frequency was between 50% to 100% in 4 countries. For TET and AMX, frequency of the resistance was in the range of 0% to 27% (5 and 3 countries, respectively). Molecular tools can be used for the rapid detection of resistance to CLR, LVX, and TET, whereas genotypic analysis is not appropriate to detect resistance to AMX and MTZ due to genomic changes found in the rdxA and pbp1A genes. The revision of the different molecular methods showed that qPCR and RFLP are the best tools to detect the resistance of H. pylori. Few molecular tools have been developed in Latin America to detect H. pylori resistance to antibiotics. More studies would be needed to understand better efficient strategies to prevent further emergence of antimicrobial resistance.
幽门螺旋杆菌抗生素耐药性的分子工具:拉丁美洲概况
治疗幽门螺杆菌感染的抗生素耐药性是三联疗法根除方案失败的主要原因。我们回顾了幽门螺杆菌的抗生素耐药性机制,并评估了拉丁美洲常用于检测抗生素耐药性的分子工具。最常报道的分子技术是 PCR 和测序,以及其变体 PCR-RFLP 和 qPCR,用于检测对克拉霉素 (CLR)、阿莫西林 (AMX)、左氧氟沙星 (LVX)、四环素 (TET) 和甲硝唑 (MTZ) 产生耐药性的基因和突变。在 7 个国家和 4 个国家中,与变异相关的耐药率分别为 CLA 的 2.2% 至 83.3%,LVX 的 12% 至 100% 不等,而在 4 个国家中,MTZ 的耐药率在 50% 至 100% 之间。对于 TET 和 AMX,抗药性频率在 0% 到 27% 之间(分别有 5 个和 3 个国家)。分子工具可用于快速检测对 CLR、LVX 和 TET 的抗药性,但由于 rdxA 和 pbp1A 基因的基因组变化,基因型分析不适合检测对 AMX 和 MTZ 的抗药性。对不同分子方法的修订表明,qPCR 和 RFLP 是检测幽门螺杆菌耐药性的最佳工具。拉丁美洲开发的检测幽门螺杆菌对抗生素耐药性的分子工具很少。需要进行更多的研究,以了解更好的有效策略,防止抗菌药耐药性的进一步出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信