Sowing seeds in decolonial cracks for pluriversity: reflections from arts–research co-productions on sustainability themes

Judith E. Krauss
{"title":"Sowing seeds in decolonial cracks for pluriversity: reflections from arts–research co-productions on sustainability themes","authors":"Judith E. Krauss","doi":"10.1332/27523349y2024d000000014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article shares the author’s reflections on what decolonial cracks for recreating UK universities as sustainable pluriversities emerge from encounters and engagement in three arts–research co-productions relating to sustainability and justice: a training process led by a professional storyteller on converting political-ecology research into short, spoken ten-minute stories, the co-production of visual summaries and a role-playing game on sustainable value chains, and the collaboration producing an immersive audiovisual exhibition on ‘Can we fly-less?’.\nThis article makes an empirically based case that engaging in co-production on arts–research knowledge translation can help identify decolonial cracks to sow the seeds of pluriversity, that is, epistemically diverse institutions for public good that recognise present patterns of colonially rooted injustices and unsustainability, in UK academia. Drawing on relational, deep-listening conversations with six collaborators on the projects, three artists and three researchers, the article highlights benefits arising from the creative collaborations, such as social, transformative learning and critical introspection, and research acquiring a life beyond the page and becoming accessible to a broader audience. However, they also emphasised institutional barriers such as perverse incentives in current academic conventions, such as little or no recognition for knowledge translation, unequal starting points among permanent/precarious or salaried/non-salaried staff, and uncooperative monitoring and application systems, which render identifying these decolonial cracks and seeds necessary. With a methodology rooted in its conceptual, relational approach, the article highlights decolonial cracks in current academia, and transformative seeds to reimagine it in a more decolonial and sustainable image befitting of a pluriversity.","PeriodicalId":483338,"journal":{"name":"Global Social Challenges Journal","volume":"27 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Social Challenges Journal","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/27523349y2024d000000014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article shares the author’s reflections on what decolonial cracks for recreating UK universities as sustainable pluriversities emerge from encounters and engagement in three arts–research co-productions relating to sustainability and justice: a training process led by a professional storyteller on converting political-ecology research into short, spoken ten-minute stories, the co-production of visual summaries and a role-playing game on sustainable value chains, and the collaboration producing an immersive audiovisual exhibition on ‘Can we fly-less?’. This article makes an empirically based case that engaging in co-production on arts–research knowledge translation can help identify decolonial cracks to sow the seeds of pluriversity, that is, epistemically diverse institutions for public good that recognise present patterns of colonially rooted injustices and unsustainability, in UK academia. Drawing on relational, deep-listening conversations with six collaborators on the projects, three artists and three researchers, the article highlights benefits arising from the creative collaborations, such as social, transformative learning and critical introspection, and research acquiring a life beyond the page and becoming accessible to a broader audience. However, they also emphasised institutional barriers such as perverse incentives in current academic conventions, such as little or no recognition for knowledge translation, unequal starting points among permanent/precarious or salaried/non-salaried staff, and uncooperative monitoring and application systems, which render identifying these decolonial cracks and seeds necessary. With a methodology rooted in its conceptual, relational approach, the article highlights decolonial cracks in current academia, and transformative seeds to reimagine it in a more decolonial and sustainable image befitting of a pluriversity.
在促进多元性的非殖民化裂缝中播撒种子:关于可持续发展主题的艺术研究联合制作的反思
本文分享了作者的反思,即通过接触和参与三个与可持续发展和正义相关的艺术研究联合制作,作者发现了哪些非殖民地裂缝,可以将英国大学重新打造为可持续发展的多元化大学:由专业讲故事者领导的将政治生态学研究转化为十分钟口语短故事的培训过程、关于可持续价值链的视觉摘要和角色扮演游戏的联合制作,以及关于 "我们可以不飞吗?本文以经验为基础,说明参与艺术研究知识转化的共同制作有助于发现非殖民地裂缝,从而在英国学术界播下多元的种子,即认识到殖民地根深蒂固的不公正和不可持续性的现有模式的认识论多元的公益机构。文章通过与项目中的六位合作者(三位艺术家和三位研究人员)进行深入的倾听式对话,强调了创造性合作带来的益处,如社会性、变革性学习和批判性反思,以及研究在纸面之外获得生命力并为更广泛的受众所接受。不过,他们也强调了一些制度性障碍,如现行学术惯例中的不正当激励机制,如知识转化很少或根本得不到认可,长期/临时或有薪/无薪人员之间的起点不平等,以及不合作的监督和应用系统,这些都使得识别这些非殖民地裂缝和种子成为必要。文章以概念性、关系性方法为基础,强调了当前学术界的非殖民化裂痕,以及以更符合多元性的非殖民化和可持续形象重新想象学术界的变革种子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信