The rising use of cognitive enhancement drugs and predictors of use during COVID-19: findings from a cross-sectional survey of students and university staff in the UK

Jamie L. Tully, Oliver Bridge, Joseph Rennie, Joy Krecké, Tobias Stevens
{"title":"The rising use of cognitive enhancement drugs and predictors of use during COVID-19: findings from a cross-sectional survey of students and university staff in the UK","authors":"Jamie L. Tully, Oliver Bridge, Joseph Rennie, Joy Krecké, Tobias Stevens","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1356496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of psychoactive substances to increase cognitive performance while studying has been termed ‘pharmacological cognitive enhancement’ (PCE). In previous years, several large-scale national surveys have focused on their use by students at university, including drug types, prevalence rates, and predictive factors. The recent coronavirus pandemic brought about widespread structural changes for UK universities, as students were forced to adapt to home-based learning and in many cases reduced academic support. No study has yet focused primarily on the impact of pandemic social restrictions on PCE in students and academic staff, and whether personality and demographic factors reveal user profiles that predict use during the pandemic period.A convenience sample of 736 UK students and staff aged 18–54 (M = 22.2, SD = 5.2) completed a cross-sectional survey assessing PCE prevalence rates, polydrug use, perceived effects, academic self-efficacy and personality during the first year of social restrictions (March 2020 – February 2021) compared with the previous year (March 2019 – February 2020).There was a significant self-reported rise in the use of all drug types (all ps < 0.001) during social restrictions, particularly with Modafinil (+42%), nutraceuticals (+30.2%) and microdose LSD (+22.2%). Respondents also indicated stronger PCE effects for all substances, except alcohol, in comparison to the previous year. Polydrug use with modafinil and other prescription stimulants increased the most during social restrictions. Personality factors and gender identity reliably predicted PCE use and lower agreeableness was often the strongest predictor, followed by identifying as male and lower conscientiousness. Academic self-efficacy and student/academic staff status were not consistent predictors.This is the first survey of UK students to investigate PCE during coronavirus social restrictions and to assess predictive factors. Findings reveal a rise in PCE use and polydrug use which we suggest is because of increased pressures on students created by the lockdown and reduced access to university resources.","PeriodicalId":507929,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"39 44","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1356496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of psychoactive substances to increase cognitive performance while studying has been termed ‘pharmacological cognitive enhancement’ (PCE). In previous years, several large-scale national surveys have focused on their use by students at university, including drug types, prevalence rates, and predictive factors. The recent coronavirus pandemic brought about widespread structural changes for UK universities, as students were forced to adapt to home-based learning and in many cases reduced academic support. No study has yet focused primarily on the impact of pandemic social restrictions on PCE in students and academic staff, and whether personality and demographic factors reveal user profiles that predict use during the pandemic period.A convenience sample of 736 UK students and staff aged 18–54 (M = 22.2, SD = 5.2) completed a cross-sectional survey assessing PCE prevalence rates, polydrug use, perceived effects, academic self-efficacy and personality during the first year of social restrictions (March 2020 – February 2021) compared with the previous year (March 2019 – February 2020).There was a significant self-reported rise in the use of all drug types (all ps < 0.001) during social restrictions, particularly with Modafinil (+42%), nutraceuticals (+30.2%) and microdose LSD (+22.2%). Respondents also indicated stronger PCE effects for all substances, except alcohol, in comparison to the previous year. Polydrug use with modafinil and other prescription stimulants increased the most during social restrictions. Personality factors and gender identity reliably predicted PCE use and lower agreeableness was often the strongest predictor, followed by identifying as male and lower conscientiousness. Academic self-efficacy and student/academic staff status were not consistent predictors.This is the first survey of UK students to investigate PCE during coronavirus social restrictions and to assess predictive factors. Findings reveal a rise in PCE use and polydrug use which we suggest is because of increased pressures on students created by the lockdown and reduced access to university resources.
在 COVID-19 期间认知增强药物使用率的上升和预测因素:对英国学生和大学教职员工的横断面调查结果
在学习过程中使用精神活性物质来提高认知能力被称为 "药理认知强化"(PCE)。前些年,一些大规模的全国性调查主要针对大学生使用这些药物的情况,包括药物类型、流行率和预测因素。最近的冠状病毒大流行给英国大学带来了广泛的结构性变化,学生被迫适应在家学习,在许多情况下减少了学术支持。目前还没有一项研究主要关注大流行病的社会限制对学生和教职员工 PCE 的影响,以及个性和人口统计因素是否揭示了可预测大流行病期间使用情况的用户特征。与前一年(2019 年 3 月至 2020 年 2 月)相比,在社会限制的第一年(2020 年 3 月至 2021 年 2 月),736 名年龄在 18-54 岁之间的英国学生和教职员工(中=22.2,标差=5.2)完成了一项横断面调查,评估了 PCE 流行率、多种药物使用情况、感知效果、学业自我效能和个性。受访者还表示,与前一年相比,除酒精外,所有物质的 PCE 效果都更强。在社会限制期间,莫达非尼和其他处方兴奋剂的多重使用增加最多。人格因素和性别认同能可靠地预测 PCE 的使用,较低的合意性往往是最强的预测因素,其次是认同为男性和较低的自觉性。这是首次对英国学生进行调查,研究冠状病毒社会限制期间 PCE 的使用情况并评估预测因素。调查结果显示,使用 PCE 和使用多种药物的情况有所增加,我们认为这是因为封锁和大学资源减少给学生造成了更大的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信