A Comparative Analysis of Theme and Thematic Progression in Descriptive Texts

Ayu Lestari, Enggar Pangesti Wibowo, Merry Adrian
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Theme and Thematic Progression in Descriptive Texts","authors":"Ayu Lestari, Enggar Pangesti Wibowo, Merry Adrian","doi":"10.36722/sh.v9i2.2830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the theme and thematic progression and compare both student’s and standardized descriptive texts. Additionally, the research would delve into the pedagogical implication in teaching a descriptive text. A text from a student of a senior high school in Semarang, Indonesia and a TOEFL Practice text were collected in the document analysis. Thematic analysis was done by applying SFL principles. The result showed that both texts employed textual and topical theme system mostly with model’s text using an interpersonal theme once. the student’s descriptive text had few missing themes which also indicated that it had grammatical mistakes that need to be given attention when teaching language to learners. Both texts served the thematic progression of zig-zag and reiteration as descriptive text aims to describe and identify an object. Although, the student had chosen few multiple patterns and seldom had no pattern in the text. Furthermore, the integration of thematic system studies and thematic development towards a descriptive text through modeling and construction activities can contribute greatly to providing substantial learning benefits to promote language proficiency and efficient communication skills.Keywords - Theme progression; SFL; Descriptive text; ELT.","PeriodicalId":435638,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL Al-AZHAR INDONESIA SERI HUMANIORA","volume":"24 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL Al-AZHAR INDONESIA SERI HUMANIORA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36722/sh.v9i2.2830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the theme and thematic progression and compare both student’s and standardized descriptive texts. Additionally, the research would delve into the pedagogical implication in teaching a descriptive text. A text from a student of a senior high school in Semarang, Indonesia and a TOEFL Practice text were collected in the document analysis. Thematic analysis was done by applying SFL principles. The result showed that both texts employed textual and topical theme system mostly with model’s text using an interpersonal theme once. the student’s descriptive text had few missing themes which also indicated that it had grammatical mistakes that need to be given attention when teaching language to learners. Both texts served the thematic progression of zig-zag and reiteration as descriptive text aims to describe and identify an object. Although, the student had chosen few multiple patterns and seldom had no pattern in the text. Furthermore, the integration of thematic system studies and thematic development towards a descriptive text through modeling and construction activities can contribute greatly to providing substantial learning benefits to promote language proficiency and efficient communication skills.Keywords - Theme progression; SFL; Descriptive text; ELT.
描述性文本中主题和主题发展的比较分析
本研究旨在分析主题和主题进展,并比较学生和标准描述性文本。此外,本研究还将深入探讨描述性文章的教学意义。在文档分析中,收集了一篇来自印尼三宝垄一所高中学生的文章和一篇托福练习文章。运用 SFL 原则进行了主题分析。结果表明,两篇文章都采用了文本和主题系统,其中模特的文章使用了一次人际主题。学生的描述性文章缺少几个主题,这也表明文章中存在语法错误,在向学习者教授语言时需要引起注意。两篇课文都采用了 "之 "字形和重复的主题进展方式,因为描述性课文旨在描述和识别对象。尽管如此,学生在课文中选择的多重句型较少,很少出现无句型的情况。此外,通过建模和建构活动,将主题系统研究和主题发展整合到描述性文本中,可以极大地促进学习,提高语言能力和高效的沟通技巧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信