LOW CONCENTRATING PHOTOVOLTAIC GEOMETRY FOR RETROFITTING ONTO EUROPEAN BUILDING STOCK

R. Parupudi, David Redpath, Harjit Singh, Mohammad Reza Jalali, Maria Kolokotroni
{"title":"LOW CONCENTRATING PHOTOVOLTAIC GEOMETRY FOR RETROFITTING ONTO EUROPEAN BUILDING STOCK","authors":"R. Parupudi, David Redpath, Harjit Singh, Mohammad Reza Jalali, Maria Kolokotroni","doi":"10.1115/1.4065980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The most appropriate Low Concentrating Photovoltaic (LCPV) technology suitable for European buildings located in mid-high latitudes under both maritime and continental climatic conditions has been identified as the Asymmetric Compound Parabolic Concentrator (ACPC). To date there is no published experimental data at different latitudes on the long-term performance of these systems at these latitudes nor how location would modify the optical characteristics of deployed systems. Previous theoretical research by the authors has demonstrated the superiority of the ACPC with this additional work experimentally confirming the robustness of the design. To investigate how seasonal and locational variations affect their measured technical performance 2 identical ACPC-LCPVs were installed, instrumented and monitored at two different climatic locations (Uxbridge, UK, and Vevey, Switzerland) from May 2020 to September 2020. A valid comparative performance investigation characterizing two geometrically equivalent ACPC based LCPV systems using real-life experimental data collected is presented in this paper. Locations at higher latitudes experience greater transverse angles more frequently compared to locations nearer the equator making ACPC geometries more appropriate than symmetrical concentrator configurations for building retrofit. This is shown in this paper over a latitudinal expanse of 31.35° for 4 separate locations; Tessalit (20.19° N, 1.00° E; Mali), Timimoun (28.03° N, 1.65° E; Algeria), Uxbridge (51.54° N, 0.48° E, UK) and Vevey (46.6° N, 6.84° E, Switzerland).","PeriodicalId":502733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Solar Energy Engineering","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Solar Energy Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4065980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The most appropriate Low Concentrating Photovoltaic (LCPV) technology suitable for European buildings located in mid-high latitudes under both maritime and continental climatic conditions has been identified as the Asymmetric Compound Parabolic Concentrator (ACPC). To date there is no published experimental data at different latitudes on the long-term performance of these systems at these latitudes nor how location would modify the optical characteristics of deployed systems. Previous theoretical research by the authors has demonstrated the superiority of the ACPC with this additional work experimentally confirming the robustness of the design. To investigate how seasonal and locational variations affect their measured technical performance 2 identical ACPC-LCPVs were installed, instrumented and monitored at two different climatic locations (Uxbridge, UK, and Vevey, Switzerland) from May 2020 to September 2020. A valid comparative performance investigation characterizing two geometrically equivalent ACPC based LCPV systems using real-life experimental data collected is presented in this paper. Locations at higher latitudes experience greater transverse angles more frequently compared to locations nearer the equator making ACPC geometries more appropriate than symmetrical concentrator configurations for building retrofit. This is shown in this paper over a latitudinal expanse of 31.35° for 4 separate locations; Tessalit (20.19° N, 1.00° E; Mali), Timimoun (28.03° N, 1.65° E; Algeria), Uxbridge (51.54° N, 0.48° E, UK) and Vevey (46.6° N, 6.84° E, Switzerland).
用于欧洲建筑改造的低聚光光伏几何结构
非对称复合抛物面聚光器 (ACPC) 是最适合欧洲中高纬度地区建筑物在海洋性和大陆性气候条件下使用的低聚光光伏 (LCPV) 技术。迄今为止,还没有关于这些系统在不同纬度地区长期性能的公开实验数据,也没有关于所处位置会如何改变所部署系统的光学特性的公开数据。作者之前的理论研究已经证明了 ACPC 的优越性,这次的额外工作通过实验证实了该设计的稳健性。为了研究季节和地点变化如何影响其测量的技术性能,从 2020 年 5 月到 2020 年 9 月,在两个不同的气候地点(英国乌克斯布里奇和瑞士沃韦)安装了两个相同的 ACPC-LCPV 并安装了仪器和进行了监测。本文利用收集到的真实实验数据,对两个基于 ACPC 的等效 LCPV 系统进行了有效的性能比较研究。与靠近赤道的地区相比,纬度较高的地区会更频繁地经历更大的横向角度,这使得 ACPC 几何结构比对称聚光器配置更适合建筑改造。本文展示了 4 个不同地点 31.35° 纬度范围内的情况:Tessalit(马里,北纬 20.19°,东经 1.00°)、Timimoun(阿尔及利亚,北纬 28.03°,东经 1.65°)、Uxbridge(英国,北纬 51.54°,东经 0.48°)和 Vevey(瑞士,北纬 46.6°,东经 6.84°)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信