Who Participates in Value-Based Care Models? Physician Characteristics and Implications for Value-based Care

Debra R Winberg, Matthew C Baker, Xiaochu Hu, Keith A Horvath
{"title":"Who Participates in Value-Based Care Models? Physician Characteristics and Implications for Value-based Care","authors":"Debra R Winberg, Matthew C Baker, Xiaochu Hu, Keith A Horvath","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxae087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Value-Based Care (VBC) payment models are becoming increasingly prevalent as alternatives to the traditional fee-for-service paradigm. This research quantifies the relationship between physician characteristics and participation in VBC payment models using the Association of American Medical Colleges’ 2022 National Sample Survey of Physicians. We specified logistic regressions using physician-level variables to assess associations with current and new participation in Accountable Care Organizations, Primary Care First (PCF) model, capitation, and bundled payments. Our results indicate that most respondents engaged in at least one VBC. Participation varied based on several characteristics, and physician specialty was highly predictive of overall participation. Compared to primary care physicians (PCPs), hospital-based physicians (OR=0.6, p<0.001), medical specialists (OR=0.5, p<0.001), psychiatrists (OR=0.4, p<0.001), and surgeons (OR=0.5, p<0.001) were less likely to participate in VBC models. Medical specialists and surgeons were less likely to participate in commercial capitation than PCPs while medical specialists and obstetricians/gynecologists were more likely to participate in certain bundles than PCPs. We suggest several policies to close the cross-specialty participation gap by including specialists and appealing to providers and patients.","PeriodicalId":502462,"journal":{"name":"Health Affairs Scholar","volume":"63 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Affairs Scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Value-Based Care (VBC) payment models are becoming increasingly prevalent as alternatives to the traditional fee-for-service paradigm. This research quantifies the relationship between physician characteristics and participation in VBC payment models using the Association of American Medical Colleges’ 2022 National Sample Survey of Physicians. We specified logistic regressions using physician-level variables to assess associations with current and new participation in Accountable Care Organizations, Primary Care First (PCF) model, capitation, and bundled payments. Our results indicate that most respondents engaged in at least one VBC. Participation varied based on several characteristics, and physician specialty was highly predictive of overall participation. Compared to primary care physicians (PCPs), hospital-based physicians (OR=0.6, p<0.001), medical specialists (OR=0.5, p<0.001), psychiatrists (OR=0.4, p<0.001), and surgeons (OR=0.5, p<0.001) were less likely to participate in VBC models. Medical specialists and surgeons were less likely to participate in commercial capitation than PCPs while medical specialists and obstetricians/gynecologists were more likely to participate in certain bundles than PCPs. We suggest several policies to close the cross-specialty participation gap by including specialists and appealing to providers and patients.
谁参与了价值导向型医疗模式?医生特点及对价值医疗的影响
作为传统收费服务模式的替代方案,基于价值的医疗(VBC)支付模式正变得越来越普遍。本研究利用美国医学院协会的 2022 年全国医生抽样调查,量化了医生特征与参与 VBC 付费模式之间的关系。我们利用医生层面的变量进行了逻辑回归,以评估当前和新参与责任医疗组织、初级医疗优先(PCF)模式、按人头付费和捆绑式付费的相关性。我们的结果表明,大多数受访者至少参与了一项自愿性医疗保险。参与情况因若干特征而异,医生专业对总体参与情况具有很高的预测性。与初级保健医生 (PCP) 相比,医院内科医生(OR=0.6,p<0.001)、医学专家(OR=0.5,p<0.001)、精神科医生(OR=0.4,p<0.001)和外科医生(OR=0.5,p<0.001)参与 VBC 模式的可能性较低。与初级保健医生相比,内科专家和外科医生参与商业按人头付费的可能性较低,而与初级保健医生相比,内科专家和妇产科医生参与某些捆绑服务的可能性较高。我们建议采取几项政策,通过纳入专科医生并吸引医疗服务提供者和患者来缩小跨专科参与的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信