Screening factors to affect ultrasound-assisted extraction of (poly)phenols from date palm seeds

R. Lucas‐González, M. Viuda‐Martos, José A. Pérez-Álvarez, J. Fernández‐López
{"title":"Screening factors to affect ultrasound-assisted extraction of (poly)phenols from date palm seeds","authors":"R. Lucas‐González, M. Viuda‐Martos, José A. Pérez-Álvarez, J. Fernández‐López","doi":"10.3389/fchem.2024.1409393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the current work was to compare the (poly)phenol profile (free, soluble-conjugate, and insoluble-bound) and antioxidant activity of date palm seed flour using different extraction methods (conventional vs. ultrasound-assisted extraction [UAE]) and to determine the most critical variables in the extraction of (poly)phenols through UAE using the Plackett–Burman design experiment. Using the Plackett–Burman design, seven factors, namely, ethanol concentration, liquid:solid ratio (mL/g), sonotrode, amplitude (%), extraction time, extractant pH, and extraction cycle, were studied. After the factors were studied using conventional extraction methods, 23 compounds were quantified, with protocatechuic acid and catechin being the predominant (poly)phenols. Furthermore, the distribution of (poly)phenols within the cell varied, with glycosylated quercetins and caffeoyl shikimic acids predominantly found in free forms. Ultrasound-assisted extraction demonstrated efficiency in extracting free and soluble-conjugate (poly)phenols. However, it showed limitations in extracting insoluble-bound (poly)phenols. Nevertheless, similar amounts of total (poly)phenols were shown after conventional extraction and UAE, that is, 259.69 ± 43.54 and 189.00 ± 3.08 mg/100 g date seed flour, respectively. The Plackett–Burman design revealed the liquid–solid ratio as a crucial factor affecting (poly)phenol extraction, with higher ratios yielding better results. The sonotrode choice also influenced the extraction efficiency, highlighting that the sonotrode with a smaller diameter but higher displacement amplitude showed the best polyphenol recovery and antioxidant activity values. The nature of (poly)phenols influenced the studied extraction variables differently, emphasizing the complexity of the extraction process. In this line, pure water was sufficient to extract flavan-3-ols after UAE, whereas ethanol was a crucial factor in extracting quercetin. These findings underscore the importance of optimizing extraction methods for maximizing (poly)phenol recovery from date palm seed flour for various applications in food and pharmacology industries.","PeriodicalId":507928,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2024.1409393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the current work was to compare the (poly)phenol profile (free, soluble-conjugate, and insoluble-bound) and antioxidant activity of date palm seed flour using different extraction methods (conventional vs. ultrasound-assisted extraction [UAE]) and to determine the most critical variables in the extraction of (poly)phenols through UAE using the Plackett–Burman design experiment. Using the Plackett–Burman design, seven factors, namely, ethanol concentration, liquid:solid ratio (mL/g), sonotrode, amplitude (%), extraction time, extractant pH, and extraction cycle, were studied. After the factors were studied using conventional extraction methods, 23 compounds were quantified, with protocatechuic acid and catechin being the predominant (poly)phenols. Furthermore, the distribution of (poly)phenols within the cell varied, with glycosylated quercetins and caffeoyl shikimic acids predominantly found in free forms. Ultrasound-assisted extraction demonstrated efficiency in extracting free and soluble-conjugate (poly)phenols. However, it showed limitations in extracting insoluble-bound (poly)phenols. Nevertheless, similar amounts of total (poly)phenols were shown after conventional extraction and UAE, that is, 259.69 ± 43.54 and 189.00 ± 3.08 mg/100 g date seed flour, respectively. The Plackett–Burman design revealed the liquid–solid ratio as a crucial factor affecting (poly)phenol extraction, with higher ratios yielding better results. The sonotrode choice also influenced the extraction efficiency, highlighting that the sonotrode with a smaller diameter but higher displacement amplitude showed the best polyphenol recovery and antioxidant activity values. The nature of (poly)phenols influenced the studied extraction variables differently, emphasizing the complexity of the extraction process. In this line, pure water was sufficient to extract flavan-3-ols after UAE, whereas ethanol was a crucial factor in extracting quercetin. These findings underscore the importance of optimizing extraction methods for maximizing (poly)phenol recovery from date palm seed flour for various applications in food and pharmacology industries.
筛选影响超声辅助提取枣椰树种子中(多)酚的因素
本研究的目的是比较使用不同萃取方法(传统萃取与超声辅助萃取[UAE])萃取枣椰籽粉中的(多)酚含量(游离、可溶性结合和不溶性结合)和抗氧化活性,并使用普拉克特-伯曼设计实验确定通过超声辅助萃取萃取(多)酚的最关键变量。利用 Plackett-Burman 设计实验,研究了七个因素,即乙醇浓度、液固比(毫升/克)、超声电极、振幅(%)、萃取时间、萃取剂 pH 值和萃取周期。采用传统萃取方法对各因素进行研究后,定量分析了 23 种化合物,其中原儿茶酸和儿茶素是主要的(多)酚类化合物。此外,(多)酚在细胞内的分布也各不相同,糖基化的槲皮素和咖啡酰莽草酸主要以游离形式存在。超声辅助萃取在萃取游离和可溶性共轭(多)酚方面表现出了高效率。然而,它在提取不溶性结合(多)酚方面表现出局限性。尽管如此,传统萃取和超音波萃取的总(多)酚含量相似,分别为 259.69 ± 43.54 和 189.00 ± 3.08 mg/100 g 枣籽粉。普拉克特-伯曼设计显示,液固比是影响(多)酚萃取的关键因素,液固比越高,萃取效果越好。声发射器的选择也会影响萃取效率,直径较小但位移振幅较大的声发射器显示出最佳的多酚回收率和抗氧化活性值。多)酚的性质对所研究的萃取变量有不同的影响,强调了萃取过程的复杂性。在这种情况下,纯水足以提取超临界后的黄烷-3-醇,而乙醇则是提取槲皮素的关键因素。这些发现强调了优化萃取方法的重要性,以便最大限度地从枣椰籽粉中回收(多)酚,用于食品和制药行业的各种应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信