The efficacy and safety of second salvage autologous transplantation in myeloma patients

R. Bicsko, Renáta Nyilas, Róbert Szász, L. Váróczy, Attila Kiss, Miklós Udvardy, Árpád Illés, L. Gergely
{"title":"The efficacy and safety of second salvage autologous transplantation in myeloma patients","authors":"R. Bicsko, Renáta Nyilas, Róbert Szász, L. Váróczy, Attila Kiss, Miklós Udvardy, Árpád Illés, L. Gergely","doi":"10.3389/pore.2024.1611851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the availability of many novel therapies for multiple myeloma, it remains an incurable disease with relapse fated in almost all patients. In the era of modern agents, second autologous stem cell transplantation still holds its role in patients relapsing after first-line autologous transplant. The authors reviewed a single-center experience with a second auto-SCT for relapsed multiple myeloma. Thirty patients had received a salvage auto-SCT at the institution. The median follow-up after diagnosis was 86 months, and the median time between transplants was 59.1 months. Response before second ASCT was the following: CR – 11 cases, VGPR – 9 cases, PR – 10 cases. Most patients received reduced dose (140 mg/m2) of melphalan as a conditioning regimen for the second auto-SCT. Treatment-related mortality was 3%. With a median follow-up time of 34 months after the second transplant, median progression-free survival was 24 months. The median PFS in the patients achieving CR or VGPR at day 100 after the second transplantation was 32 months. By 15 months, all patients achieved only partial remission progressed, with a median PFS of 8.5 months. During the follow-up period, no MDS or AML developed, and the frequency of second malignancy was also low, 3%. In conclusion, second autologous stem cell transplantation is a well-tolerated and effective treatment option for relapsed multiple myeloma in selected patients, though with a shorter PFS than in first remission.","PeriodicalId":20037,"journal":{"name":"Pathology and Oncology Research","volume":"7 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology and Oncology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/pore.2024.1611851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the availability of many novel therapies for multiple myeloma, it remains an incurable disease with relapse fated in almost all patients. In the era of modern agents, second autologous stem cell transplantation still holds its role in patients relapsing after first-line autologous transplant. The authors reviewed a single-center experience with a second auto-SCT for relapsed multiple myeloma. Thirty patients had received a salvage auto-SCT at the institution. The median follow-up after diagnosis was 86 months, and the median time between transplants was 59.1 months. Response before second ASCT was the following: CR – 11 cases, VGPR – 9 cases, PR – 10 cases. Most patients received reduced dose (140 mg/m2) of melphalan as a conditioning regimen for the second auto-SCT. Treatment-related mortality was 3%. With a median follow-up time of 34 months after the second transplant, median progression-free survival was 24 months. The median PFS in the patients achieving CR or VGPR at day 100 after the second transplantation was 32 months. By 15 months, all patients achieved only partial remission progressed, with a median PFS of 8.5 months. During the follow-up period, no MDS or AML developed, and the frequency of second malignancy was also low, 3%. In conclusion, second autologous stem cell transplantation is a well-tolerated and effective treatment option for relapsed multiple myeloma in selected patients, though with a shorter PFS than in first remission.
骨髓瘤患者第二次挽救性自体移植的疗效和安全性
尽管多发性骨髓瘤有了许多新型疗法,但它仍然是一种无法治愈的疾病,几乎所有患者都会复发。在现代药物时代,对于一线自体干细胞移植后复发的患者,二次自体干细胞移植仍有其作用。作者回顾了单中心第二次自体干细胞移植治疗复发多发性骨髓瘤的经验。该机构有30名患者接受了挽救性自体移植。确诊后的中位随访时间为86个月,两次移植之间的中位间隔时间为59.1个月。第二次自体移植前的反应情况如下:CR - 11例,VGPR - 9例,PR - 10例。大多数患者在第二次自体造血干细胞移植中接受了减量(140 毫克/平方米)美啡仑作为条件治疗方案。治疗相关死亡率为 3%。第二次移植后的中位随访时间为34个月,中位无进展生存期为24个月。第二次移植后第100天达到CR或VGPR的患者的中位无进展生存期为32个月。到15个月时,所有仅获得部分缓解的患者都出现了进展,中位无进展生存期为8.5个月。在随访期间,没有出现MDS或AML,二次恶性肿瘤的发生率也很低,仅为3%。总之,对于复发的多发性骨髓瘤患者,二次自体干细胞移植是一种耐受性良好且有效的治疗选择,尽管PFS比首次缓解期短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信