Meaning-making and transformative engagement – notes on Gunther Kress’s social semiotic and multimodal approach to learning

Staffan Selander
{"title":"Meaning-making and transformative engagement – notes on Gunther Kress’s social semiotic and multimodal approach to learning","authors":"Staffan Selander","doi":"10.1515/text-2022-0099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Against the background of a longstanding collaboration between Gunther Kress’s research group in London and my own research group in Stockholm, I reflect, in this paper, on the role of Kress’s ideas in our joint development of a social semiotic, multimodal, and design-oriented approach to learning, an approach which sees learning as performative, and as an activity in which learners create their own learning paths. I first discuss how, for Kress, this path has three elements, the affordances of the learning resources available to the learner, the learner’s ‘interest’ which turns aspects of these resources into ‘prompts’ for learning, and the learner’s active interpretation and transformation of these aspects, the results of which can then be recognized and valued as ‘signs of learning’. However, recognizing learning also needs to take account of the dimension of time, so as to make it possible to assess whether learners have gained knowledges and skills they did not have at an earlier stage. I then discuss the role of context in Kress’s thinking about learning. For Kress, context is another vital aspect of a social semiotic theory of learning. On the one hand, Kress focuses here on the specific, unique contexts in which individual learners create their own learning paths. On the other hand, he recognizes that signs will always carry social and political relations. Reflecting on the dynamic relation between individual learners and the way institutions regulate ways of learning, I discuss both the continued role of institutional learning contexts and their hidden curricula, and the way emerging technologies facilitate individual learning paths and interactive, participatory forms of learning.","PeriodicalId":288003,"journal":{"name":"Text & Talk","volume":"3 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Text & Talk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2022-0099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Against the background of a longstanding collaboration between Gunther Kress’s research group in London and my own research group in Stockholm, I reflect, in this paper, on the role of Kress’s ideas in our joint development of a social semiotic, multimodal, and design-oriented approach to learning, an approach which sees learning as performative, and as an activity in which learners create their own learning paths. I first discuss how, for Kress, this path has three elements, the affordances of the learning resources available to the learner, the learner’s ‘interest’ which turns aspects of these resources into ‘prompts’ for learning, and the learner’s active interpretation and transformation of these aspects, the results of which can then be recognized and valued as ‘signs of learning’. However, recognizing learning also needs to take account of the dimension of time, so as to make it possible to assess whether learners have gained knowledges and skills they did not have at an earlier stage. I then discuss the role of context in Kress’s thinking about learning. For Kress, context is another vital aspect of a social semiotic theory of learning. On the one hand, Kress focuses here on the specific, unique contexts in which individual learners create their own learning paths. On the other hand, he recognizes that signs will always carry social and political relations. Reflecting on the dynamic relation between individual learners and the way institutions regulate ways of learning, I discuss both the continued role of institutional learning contexts and their hidden curricula, and the way emerging technologies facilitate individual learning paths and interactive, participatory forms of learning.
创造意义和变革性参与--关于冈瑟-克雷斯的社会符号学和多模态学习方法的说明
伦敦的冈瑟-克雷斯研究小组和斯德哥尔摩的我自己的研究小组之间有着长期的合作关系,在本文中,我将反思克雷斯的观点在我们共同开发社会符号学、多模态和以设计为导向的学习方法中所起的作用。我首先讨论的是,在克雷斯看来,这种学习路径包含三个要素:学习者可利用的学习资源的可负担性;学习者的 "兴趣",它将这些资源的各个方面转化为学习的 "提示";以及学习者对这些方面的积极解释和转化,其结果可以作为 "学习的标志 "得到认可和重视。然而,对学习的认可还需要考虑到时间因素,这样才能评估学习者是否获得了他们在早期阶段不具备的知识和技能。接下来,我将讨论情境在克雷斯学习思想中的作用。在克雷斯看来,语境是社会符号学学习理论的另一个重要方面。一方面,克雷斯在这里关注的是个体学习者创造自己学习路径的具体而独特的情境。另一方面,他认识到,符号总是带有社会和政治关系。在反思个体学习者与机构规范学习方式之间的动态关系时,我既讨论了机构学习环境及其隐性课程的持续作用,也讨论了新兴技术促进个体学习路径和互动参与式学习的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信