An experimental investigation of process parameters on material removal and surface roughness improvement in abrasive flow machining

Hari Om, Himmat Singh, Govind Vashishtha
{"title":"An experimental investigation of process parameters on material removal and surface roughness improvement in abrasive flow machining","authors":"Hari Om, Himmat Singh, Govind Vashishtha","doi":"10.1088/2631-8695/ad63f9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Today, there is huge demand for mechanical components with long life cycles, and superior surface finishes as a result of the industrial revolution. New methods for nano-finishing complex structures, including abrasive flow machining (AFM), have been developed in response to the need for superior surface finish. This is a relatively new technique in non-conventional machining techniques. Because abrasion only happens in locations where flow is restricted, this approach is utilized to polish metallic parts as well as interior, inaccessible cavities, and recesses using a semi-liquid paste. It has evolved to flow of abrasives with a viscoelastic polymer (referred to as abrasive media) over complex geometries, and edges to deburr, and radius those surfaces. This paper focuses on investigating the impact of process parameters on material removal, and percentage improvement in surface roughness on cylindrical brass workpieces using Taguchi L9 orthogonal array, the number of cycles, extrusion pressure, and grit size of abrasives have been selected. The abrasive medium employed in this investigation is composed of a blend of polymer, hydrocarbon gel, and aluminium oxide abrasive particles with varying grit sizes. The outcome shows which process parameters to optimize for material removal, and improvement in percentage improvement in surface roughness. The number of cycles that have the largest percentage contribution to material removal was 83.74%. For the response material removal, the percentage contributions of the abrasive particle grit size, and extrusion pressure are 2.03%, and 14.16%, respectively. N2P2G3 has the optimal level used for material removal. The largest percentage contribution to improvement in surface roughness, or 83.48%, was the result of the number of cycles. Extrusion pressure, and abrasive particle grit size account for 7.38%, and 8.88% of the total percentage contribution, respectively. N3P2G3 has the optimal level obtained for percentage improvement in surface roughness improvement.","PeriodicalId":505725,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Research Express","volume":"4 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Research Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ad63f9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Today, there is huge demand for mechanical components with long life cycles, and superior surface finishes as a result of the industrial revolution. New methods for nano-finishing complex structures, including abrasive flow machining (AFM), have been developed in response to the need for superior surface finish. This is a relatively new technique in non-conventional machining techniques. Because abrasion only happens in locations where flow is restricted, this approach is utilized to polish metallic parts as well as interior, inaccessible cavities, and recesses using a semi-liquid paste. It has evolved to flow of abrasives with a viscoelastic polymer (referred to as abrasive media) over complex geometries, and edges to deburr, and radius those surfaces. This paper focuses on investigating the impact of process parameters on material removal, and percentage improvement in surface roughness on cylindrical brass workpieces using Taguchi L9 orthogonal array, the number of cycles, extrusion pressure, and grit size of abrasives have been selected. The abrasive medium employed in this investigation is composed of a blend of polymer, hydrocarbon gel, and aluminium oxide abrasive particles with varying grit sizes. The outcome shows which process parameters to optimize for material removal, and improvement in percentage improvement in surface roughness. The number of cycles that have the largest percentage contribution to material removal was 83.74%. For the response material removal, the percentage contributions of the abrasive particle grit size, and extrusion pressure are 2.03%, and 14.16%, respectively. N2P2G3 has the optimal level used for material removal. The largest percentage contribution to improvement in surface roughness, or 83.48%, was the result of the number of cycles. Extrusion pressure, and abrasive particle grit size account for 7.38%, and 8.88% of the total percentage contribution, respectively. N3P2G3 has the optimal level obtained for percentage improvement in surface roughness improvement.
磨料流加工中工艺参数对材料去除和表面粗糙度改善的实验研究
如今,工业革命对使用寿命长、表面光洁度高的机械部件提出了巨大需求。纳米加工复杂结构的新方法,包括磨料流加工 (AFM),就是为了满足对优质表面光洁度的需求而开发的。这是一种相对较新的非常规加工技术。由于磨蚀只发生在流动受限的位置,因此这种方法可用于使用半液体浆料抛光金属零件以及内部无法进入的空腔和凹槽。目前,这种方法已发展为在复杂的几何形状和边缘上流动带有粘弹性聚合物的磨料(称为磨料介质),以去除毛刺并修整这些表面。本文采用 Taguchi L9 正交阵列,选择了循环次数、挤压压力和磨料粒度,重点研究了工艺参数对材料去除率和圆柱形黄铜工件表面粗糙度改善百分比的影响。本次研究采用的磨料介质由聚合物、碳氢化合物凝胶和不同粒度的氧化铝磨料颗粒混合而成。研究结果表明,应优化哪些工艺参数,以提高材料去除率和表面粗糙度改善率。对材料去除率贡献最大的循环次数为 83.74%。对于材料去除率的响应,磨粒粒度和挤压压力的贡献率分别为 2.03% 和 14.16%。N2P2G3 具有最佳的材料去除率。循环次数对表面粗糙度的改善作用最大,占 83.48%。挤压压力和磨料粒度分别占总贡献百分比的 7.38% 和 8.88%。N3P2G3 是表面粗糙度改善百分比的最佳水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信