Uneven Walking is Challenging: step-ups or extended steps that is the question

bioRxiv Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1101/2024.07.10.602932
S. Hosseini-Yazdi
{"title":"Uneven Walking is Challenging: step-ups or extended steps that is the question","authors":"S. Hosseini-Yazdi","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.10.602932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Uneven terrain presents significant challenges for walkers, resulting in increased energy expenditures. Given that Center of Mass (COM) work reflects this energy demand, it's reasonable to assume that individuals also seek strategies to minimize mechanical work. One such strategy involves deciding between extending step length to avoid terrain irregularities or simply traversing over them. Each approach carries its own mechanical cost, leading to the adoption of the less costly option. To investigate this, we conducted a simulation focusing on COM mechanical work under the assumption that gait energy is entirely provided through pre-emptive push-off. We examined the COM work required for step length extension, ranging from nominal to twice its magnitude, and compared it with the mechanical work needed for step-ups from zero to 0.05 m. The simulation revealed a critical threshold for a given walking velocity and perturbation amplitude: below it, extending step length was more favorable, while beyond it, landing atop perturbations became the preferred choice. As perturbation amplitude rose, the magnitude of the threshold also increased.","PeriodicalId":9124,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.10.602932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Uneven terrain presents significant challenges for walkers, resulting in increased energy expenditures. Given that Center of Mass (COM) work reflects this energy demand, it's reasonable to assume that individuals also seek strategies to minimize mechanical work. One such strategy involves deciding between extending step length to avoid terrain irregularities or simply traversing over them. Each approach carries its own mechanical cost, leading to the adoption of the less costly option. To investigate this, we conducted a simulation focusing on COM mechanical work under the assumption that gait energy is entirely provided through pre-emptive push-off. We examined the COM work required for step length extension, ranging from nominal to twice its magnitude, and compared it with the mechanical work needed for step-ups from zero to 0.05 m. The simulation revealed a critical threshold for a given walking velocity and perturbation amplitude: below it, extending step length was more favorable, while beyond it, landing atop perturbations became the preferred choice. As perturbation amplitude rose, the magnitude of the threshold also increased.
崎岖不平的行走是一种挑战:是迈步还是伸步,这是个问题
不平坦的地形给步行者带来了巨大挑战,导致能量消耗增加。鉴于质量中心功(COM)反映了这种能量需求,我们可以合理地假设,步行者也在寻求尽量减少机械功的策略。其中一种策略就是在延长步长以避开不规则地形和简单穿越不规则地形之间做出选择。每种方法都会产生各自的机械成本,从而导致采用成本较低的方案。为了研究这个问题,我们进行了一次模拟,重点是在步态能量完全由先发制人的推力提供的假设下的 COM 机械功。我们研究了步长延长(从额定值到两倍)所需的COM功,并将其与步幅从0米到0.05米所需的机械功进行了比较。模拟结果表明,在给定的步行速度和扰动幅度下,存在一个临界阈值:低于该阈值时,步长延长更有利,而超过该阈值时,顶点着地扰动成为首选。随着扰动振幅的增加,临界值的大小也在增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信