Guillermina Tormo‐Carbó, Elies Seguí‐Mas, Victor Oltra
{"title":"Education first? Triggering vs jeopardising entrepreneurial intentions","authors":"Guillermina Tormo‐Carbó, Elies Seguí‐Mas, Victor Oltra","doi":"10.1108/et-10-2023-0420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeDrawing on the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TBP) and Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), this study delves into how, in entrepreneurship-unfriendly environments, university students’ entrepreneurial intention (EI) is shaped, focusing particularly on the role of entrepreneurship education (EE) and an entrepreneurial family context (EFC).Design/methodology/approachA sample of 688 students at a Spanish university was used for testing our hypotheses using GUESSS project data, through PLS-SEM regression and multigroup analysis (entrepreneurship course vs non-course students).FindingsPositive and significant impacts of entrepreneurial attitude (EA) and entrepreneurial self-efficacy (ESE) on EI, and of subjective norms (SN) on EA and ESE, were found in both groups. Conversely, the impacts of an EFC on EA, SN and EI were significant only for course students, and the impact of SN on EI was significant only for non-course students. The impact of EFC on ESE was not significant for either group.Originality/valueThis investigation delves into how the TPB components shape university students’ EI in entrepreneurship-unfriendly contexts, and offers an original multigroup analysis to explore the role of EE in such dynamics. A novel contribution of this study is the finding that EE is a relevant catalyser for making entrepreneurial parents become an effective trigger for entrepreneurship. Conversely, EE was, unexpectedly, deemed irrelevant or counter-productive for some aspects of entrepreneurial dynamics. Further research is encouraged, delving into the role of social and cultural contexts.","PeriodicalId":503966,"journal":{"name":"Education + Training","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education + Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/et-10-2023-0420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
PurposeDrawing on the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TBP) and Social Cognitive Theory (SCT), this study delves into how, in entrepreneurship-unfriendly environments, university students’ entrepreneurial intention (EI) is shaped, focusing particularly on the role of entrepreneurship education (EE) and an entrepreneurial family context (EFC).Design/methodology/approachA sample of 688 students at a Spanish university was used for testing our hypotheses using GUESSS project data, through PLS-SEM regression and multigroup analysis (entrepreneurship course vs non-course students).FindingsPositive and significant impacts of entrepreneurial attitude (EA) and entrepreneurial self-efficacy (ESE) on EI, and of subjective norms (SN) on EA and ESE, were found in both groups. Conversely, the impacts of an EFC on EA, SN and EI were significant only for course students, and the impact of SN on EI was significant only for non-course students. The impact of EFC on ESE was not significant for either group.Originality/valueThis investigation delves into how the TPB components shape university students’ EI in entrepreneurship-unfriendly contexts, and offers an original multigroup analysis to explore the role of EE in such dynamics. A novel contribution of this study is the finding that EE is a relevant catalyser for making entrepreneurial parents become an effective trigger for entrepreneurship. Conversely, EE was, unexpectedly, deemed irrelevant or counter-productive for some aspects of entrepreneurial dynamics. Further research is encouraged, delving into the role of social and cultural contexts.
目的本研究以计划行为理论(TBP)和社会认知理论(SCT)为基础,探讨在不适宜创业的环境中,大学生的创业意向(EI)是如何形成的,尤其关注创业教育(EE)和创业家庭环境(EFC)的作用。研究结果发现,创业态度(EA)和创业自我效能感(ESE)对 EI 有积极而显著的影响,主观规范(SN)对 EA 和 ESE 也有积极而显著的影响。相反,EFC 对 EA、SN 和 EI 的影响只对修课学生显著,而 SN 对 EI 的影响只对非修课学生显著。原创性/价值 本研究深入探讨了在不适宜创业的环境中,TPB 各要素如何影响大学生的创业能力,并提供了一种独创的多组分析方法,以探讨创业教育在这种动态变化中的作用。本研究的一个新贡献是发现 EE 是使创业父母成为创业有效触发器的相关催化剂。相反,EE 却被意外地认为与创业动力的某些方面无关或起反作用。我们鼓励进一步研究社会和文化背景的作用。