Developing a Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) survey for university teachers

IF 4.1 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Ha Nguyen , Jolien Marleen Mouw , Angeliki Mali , Jan-Willem Strijbos , Hanke Korpershoek
{"title":"Developing a Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) survey for university teachers","authors":"Ha Nguyen ,&nbsp;Jolien Marleen Mouw ,&nbsp;Angeliki Mali ,&nbsp;Jan-Willem Strijbos ,&nbsp;Hanke Korpershoek","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Existing Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) surveys target pre-service or K-12 teachers, whereas none have been specifically adapted for university teachers. To adequately measure TPACK-competences of university teachers, the specific characteristics of teaching in a university context need to be taken into account. Survey items that are not contextualized to the target participants increase the risk of measurement error and bias. Therefore, we adapted existing TPACK surveys to specifically measure university teachers’ competences for teaching with technology. We shortlisted five existing TPACK surveys and scrutinized their respective subscales and items. We then adapted these items to more adequately capture context-specific experiences for university teachers to ensure construct validity. We collected two waves of data to test our adapted TPACK survey, which comprises 31 items distributed across seven subscales, among teachers from various disciplines in a large university. With confirmatory factor analysis, we confirmed the seven-factor structure of the adapted TPACK survey in both data waves. Moreover, the seven subscales showed adequate internal consistency. An exploration of TPACK competences among teachers from different disciplines showed both similarities as well as dissimilarities. An example of similarities is that university teachers from all disciplines felt most competent in CK and PCK, while they reported relatively low competence ratings for TPCK and TPK. Besides, an example of dissimilarities is PK; teachers from the discipline of science and engineering reported the highest score compared to other disciplines in the prior wave, while they evaluated themselves third lowest in the latter wave.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100202"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000429/pdfft?md5=2195c53fdff60072bdd30a467dd5ccdd&pid=1-s2.0-S2666557324000429-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666557324000429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) surveys target pre-service or K-12 teachers, whereas none have been specifically adapted for university teachers. To adequately measure TPACK-competences of university teachers, the specific characteristics of teaching in a university context need to be taken into account. Survey items that are not contextualized to the target participants increase the risk of measurement error and bias. Therefore, we adapted existing TPACK surveys to specifically measure university teachers’ competences for teaching with technology. We shortlisted five existing TPACK surveys and scrutinized their respective subscales and items. We then adapted these items to more adequately capture context-specific experiences for university teachers to ensure construct validity. We collected two waves of data to test our adapted TPACK survey, which comprises 31 items distributed across seven subscales, among teachers from various disciplines in a large university. With confirmatory factor analysis, we confirmed the seven-factor structure of the adapted TPACK survey in both data waves. Moreover, the seven subscales showed adequate internal consistency. An exploration of TPACK competences among teachers from different disciplines showed both similarities as well as dissimilarities. An example of similarities is that university teachers from all disciplines felt most competent in CK and PCK, while they reported relatively low competence ratings for TPCK and TPK. Besides, an example of dissimilarities is PK; teachers from the discipline of science and engineering reported the highest score compared to other disciplines in the prior wave, while they evaluated themselves third lowest in the latter wave.

为大学教师编制技术教学与内容知识(TPACK)调查表
现有的技术教学与内容知识(TPACK)调查针对的是职前或 K-12 教师,而没有一项调查是专门针对大学教师的。要充分测量大学教师的 TPACK 能力,就必须考虑到大学教学的具体特点。不针对目标参与者的调查项目会增加测量误差和偏差的风险。因此,我们对现有的 TPACK 调查进行了改编,以专门测量大学教师的技术教学能力。我们筛选了五个现有的 TPACK 调查,并仔细研究了它们各自的分量表和项目。然后,我们对这些项目进行了调整,以更充分地反映大学教师的具体情况,从而确保建构效度。我们收集了两波数据,在一所大型大学不同学科的教师中测试了我们改编后的 TPACK 调查,该调查由 31 个项目组成,分布在 7 个分量表中。通过确认性因子分析,我们在两轮数据中都确认了改编后的 TPACK 调查的七因子结构。此外,七个分量表显示出足够的内部一致性。对来自不同学科的教师的 TPACK 能力的调查显示,既有相似之处,也有不同之处。相似性的一个例子是,所有学科的大学教师都认为自己在CK和PCK方面的能力最强,而在TPCK和TPK方面的能力评分相对较低。此外,差异的一个例子是 PK,理工科教师在前一轮中的得分与其他学科相比最高,而在后一轮中,他们对自己的评价却排在倒数第三位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信