Xiang Wan , Zhenglun Yang , Bing Xu , Ye Tian , Jieyu Gao , Xueqi Xia , Wenfeng Tan
{"title":"Methodology for evaluating soil carbon stock changes based on regional geochemical survey data: A case study in Huangpi, China","authors":"Xiang Wan , Zhenglun Yang , Bing Xu , Ye Tian , Jieyu Gao , Xueqi Xia , Wenfeng Tan","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeochem.2024.106092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Soil carbon pools play a crucial role in the Earth's ecosystem, acting as significant carbon sinks and sources. Through a detailed analysis of soil carbon content using data from the Huangpi District in Wuhan, China, this research employs geochemical survey data, field replicates, and spatial autocorrelation information to establish an assessment model for soil carbon stocks. The model addresses the sources of errors and their effects on carbon pool changes, using both traditional statistical theories and geostatistical models to detect changes in carbon density and estimate carbon sources and sinks with minimized error ranges. Key findings indicate that sampling errors, influenced by small-scale spatial variability, are the primary source of observational inaccuracies in assessing total soil carbon and organic carbon, accounting for over 90% of the variation. Meanwhile, analytical errors are more significant when quantifying soil inorganic carbon content due to its lower concentrations. From 2001 to 2022, no significant changes were observed in the soil organic carbon stock in Huangpi District, while a modest increase in inorganic carbon was noted. The study highlights that increasing sample density beyond a certain threshold does not significantly affect carbon stock estimates or their error ranges, emphasizing the stability of the block kriging method in estimating regional carbon stocks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8064,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geochemistry","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 106092"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883292724001975","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Soil carbon pools play a crucial role in the Earth's ecosystem, acting as significant carbon sinks and sources. Through a detailed analysis of soil carbon content using data from the Huangpi District in Wuhan, China, this research employs geochemical survey data, field replicates, and spatial autocorrelation information to establish an assessment model for soil carbon stocks. The model addresses the sources of errors and their effects on carbon pool changes, using both traditional statistical theories and geostatistical models to detect changes in carbon density and estimate carbon sources and sinks with minimized error ranges. Key findings indicate that sampling errors, influenced by small-scale spatial variability, are the primary source of observational inaccuracies in assessing total soil carbon and organic carbon, accounting for over 90% of the variation. Meanwhile, analytical errors are more significant when quantifying soil inorganic carbon content due to its lower concentrations. From 2001 to 2022, no significant changes were observed in the soil organic carbon stock in Huangpi District, while a modest increase in inorganic carbon was noted. The study highlights that increasing sample density beyond a certain threshold does not significantly affect carbon stock estimates or their error ranges, emphasizing the stability of the block kriging method in estimating regional carbon stocks.
期刊介绍:
Applied Geochemistry is an international journal devoted to publication of original research papers, rapid research communications and selected review papers in geochemistry and urban geochemistry which have some practical application to an aspect of human endeavour, such as the preservation of the environment, health, waste disposal and the search for resources. Papers on applications of inorganic, organic and isotope geochemistry and geochemical processes are therefore welcome provided they meet the main criterion. Spatial and temporal monitoring case studies are only of interest to our international readership if they present new ideas of broad application.
Topics covered include: (1) Environmental geochemistry (including natural and anthropogenic aspects, and protection and remediation strategies); (2) Hydrogeochemistry (surface and groundwater); (3) Medical (urban) geochemistry; (4) The search for energy resources (in particular unconventional oil and gas or emerging metal resources); (5) Energy exploitation (in particular geothermal energy and CCS); (6) Upgrading of energy and mineral resources where there is a direct geochemical application; and (7) Waste disposal, including nuclear waste disposal.