Differentially private de-identifying textual medical document is compliant with challenging NLP analyses: Example of privacy-preserving ICD-10 code association

Yakini Tchouka , Jean-François Couchot , David Laiymani , Philippe Selles , Azzedine Rahmani
{"title":"Differentially private de-identifying textual medical document is compliant with challenging NLP analyses: Example of privacy-preserving ICD-10 code association","authors":"Yakini Tchouka ,&nbsp;Jean-François Couchot ,&nbsp;David Laiymani ,&nbsp;Philippe Selles ,&nbsp;Azzedine Rahmani","doi":"10.1016/j.iswa.2024.200416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Medical research plays a crucial role within scientific research. Technological advancements, especially those related to the rise of machine learning, pave the way for the exploration of medical issues that were once beyond reach. Unstructured textual data, such as correspondence between doctors, operative reports, etc., often serve as a starting point for many medical applications.</p><p>However, for obvious privacy reasons, researchers do not legally have the right to access these documents as long as they contain sensitive data, as defined by regulations like GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) or HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act). De-identification, meaning the detection, removal or substitution of all sensitive information, is therefore a necessary step to facilitate the sharing of these data between the medical field and research. Over the past decade, various approaches have been proposed to de-identify medical textual data. However, while entity detection is a well-known task in the natural language processing field, it presents some specific challenges in the medical context. Moreover, existing substitution methods proposed in the literature often pay little attention to the medical relevance of de-identified data or are not very resilient to attacks.</p><p>This paper addresses these challenges. Firstly, an efficient system for detecting sensitive entities in French medical data and then accurately substitute them was implemented. Secondly, robust strategies for generating substitutes that incorporate the medical utility of the data were provided, thereby minimizing the difference in utility between the original and de-identified data, and that mathematically ensure privacy protection. Thirdly, the utility of the de-identification system in a context of ICD-10 code association was evaluated. Finally, various systems developed to tackle ICD-10 code association were presented while providing a state-of-the-art model in French.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100684,"journal":{"name":"Intelligent Systems with Applications","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 200416"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667305324000905/pdfft?md5=29cf344a4f123c829f2d360e07665c5f&pid=1-s2.0-S2667305324000905-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligent Systems with Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667305324000905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medical research plays a crucial role within scientific research. Technological advancements, especially those related to the rise of machine learning, pave the way for the exploration of medical issues that were once beyond reach. Unstructured textual data, such as correspondence between doctors, operative reports, etc., often serve as a starting point for many medical applications.

However, for obvious privacy reasons, researchers do not legally have the right to access these documents as long as they contain sensitive data, as defined by regulations like GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) or HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act). De-identification, meaning the detection, removal or substitution of all sensitive information, is therefore a necessary step to facilitate the sharing of these data between the medical field and research. Over the past decade, various approaches have been proposed to de-identify medical textual data. However, while entity detection is a well-known task in the natural language processing field, it presents some specific challenges in the medical context. Moreover, existing substitution methods proposed in the literature often pay little attention to the medical relevance of de-identified data or are not very resilient to attacks.

This paper addresses these challenges. Firstly, an efficient system for detecting sensitive entities in French medical data and then accurately substitute them was implemented. Secondly, robust strategies for generating substitutes that incorporate the medical utility of the data were provided, thereby minimizing the difference in utility between the original and de-identified data, and that mathematically ensure privacy protection. Thirdly, the utility of the de-identification system in a context of ICD-10 code association was evaluated. Finally, various systems developed to tackle ICD-10 code association were presented while providing a state-of-the-art model in French.

差异化隐私去识别文本医疗文档符合具有挑战性的 NLP 分析:保护隐私的 ICD-10 编码关联示例
医学研究在科学研究中发挥着至关重要的作用。技术的进步,特别是与机器学习的兴起有关的技术进步,为探索医学问题铺平了道路,而这些问题曾经是遥不可及的。然而,出于明显的隐私原因,研究人员在法律上无权访问这些文档,只要其中包含 GDPR(《通用数据保护条例》)或 HIPAA(《健康保险可携性和责任法案》)等法规所定义的敏感数据。因此,去身份化,即检测、删除或替换所有敏感信息,是促进医疗和研究领域共享这些数据的必要步骤。在过去十年中,人们提出了各种方法来消除医疗文本数据的身份识别。然而,虽然实体检测是自然语言处理领域的一项众所周知的任务,但在医疗领域却面临着一些特殊的挑战。此外,文献中提出的现有替换方法往往很少关注去标识化数据的医学相关性,或者对攻击的抵御能力不强。首先,本文实现了一个高效的系统,用于检测法国医疗数据中的敏感实体,然后准确地替换它们。其次,本文提供了生成替代物的稳健策略,这些替代物结合了数据的医疗效用,从而最大限度地减少了原始数据和去标识化数据之间的效用差异,并在数学上确保了隐私保护。第三,评估了去标识化系统在 ICD-10 编码关联背景下的效用。最后,介绍了为解决 ICD-10 代码关联问题而开发的各种系统,同时提供了最先进的法文模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信