{"title":"BALAD score predicts the recurrence and survival in the patients who underwent initial hepatectomy for HCC","authors":"Shigeki Nakagawa, Hiromitsu Hayashi, Rumi Itoyama, Yuki Kitano, Kosuke Mima, Hirohisa Okabe, Hideo Baba","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Backgrounds</h3><p>Several studies have indicated that BALAD score which includes the HCC tumor markers of HCC, AFP, AFP-L3%, DCP, and serum albumin and bilirubin value were good predictors of HCC patients for all treatment modalities. In this study, we aim to clarify the impact of BALAD score as the prognostic factor for HCC patients after curative surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study investigated 578 patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC between January 2003 and May 2013. Cumulative recurrence rate, overall survival (OS), and clinicopathological parameters were analyzed according to the level of BALAD score.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In patients with higher BALAD score, recurrence rate and OS was poor (p = 0.0015 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Multivariate analyses revealed independent risk factors for recurrence to be male (hazard ratio [HR] 1.52, <em>P</em> = 0.011), HCV-antibody positive (HR 1.33, <em>P</em> = 0.019), multiple tumors (HR 2.16, <em>P</em> < 0.0001), microvascular invasion (HR 1.45, <em>P</em> = 0.0035) and higher BALAD score (RR 1.70, <em>P</em> = 0.015). The independent risk factors for OS were multiple tumors (HR 1.52, <em>P</em> = 0.014), microvascular invasion (HR 1.53, <em>P</em> = 0.012), and higher BALAD score (RR 2.51, <em>P</em> = 0.0012).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>BALAD score is associated with high recurrence rate and poor overall survival of the patients who underwent curative liver resection for HCC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960740424000653","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Backgrounds
Several studies have indicated that BALAD score which includes the HCC tumor markers of HCC, AFP, AFP-L3%, DCP, and serum albumin and bilirubin value were good predictors of HCC patients for all treatment modalities. In this study, we aim to clarify the impact of BALAD score as the prognostic factor for HCC patients after curative surgery.
Methods
This study investigated 578 patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC between January 2003 and May 2013. Cumulative recurrence rate, overall survival (OS), and clinicopathological parameters were analyzed according to the level of BALAD score.
Results
In patients with higher BALAD score, recurrence rate and OS was poor (p = 0.0015 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Multivariate analyses revealed independent risk factors for recurrence to be male (hazard ratio [HR] 1.52, P = 0.011), HCV-antibody positive (HR 1.33, P = 0.019), multiple tumors (HR 2.16, P < 0.0001), microvascular invasion (HR 1.45, P = 0.0035) and higher BALAD score (RR 1.70, P = 0.015). The independent risk factors for OS were multiple tumors (HR 1.52, P = 0.014), microvascular invasion (HR 1.53, P = 0.012), and higher BALAD score (RR 2.51, P = 0.0012).
Conclusion
BALAD score is associated with high recurrence rate and poor overall survival of the patients who underwent curative liver resection for HCC.
期刊介绍:
Surgical Oncology is a peer reviewed journal publishing review articles that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in surgical oncology and related fields of interest. Articles represent a spectrum of current technology in oncology research as well as those concerning clinical trials, surgical technique, methods of investigation and patient evaluation. Surgical Oncology publishes comprehensive Reviews that examine individual topics in considerable detail, in addition to editorials and commentaries which focus on selected papers. The journal also publishes special issues which explore topics of interest to surgical oncologists in great detail - outlining recent advancements and providing readers with the most up to date information.