Temporal and external validation of the algorithm predicting first trimester outcome of a viable pregnancy.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Nicole Stamatopoulos, Donna Ngo, Chuan Lu, Mercedes Espada Vaquero, Mathew Leonardi, George Condous
{"title":"Temporal and external validation of the algorithm predicting first trimester outcome of a viable pregnancy.","authors":"Nicole Stamatopoulos, Donna Ngo, Chuan Lu, Mercedes Espada Vaquero, Mathew Leonardi, George Condous","doi":"10.1111/ajo.13855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Symptoms like vaginal bleeding or abdominal pain in early pregnancy can create anxiety about potential miscarriage. Previous studies have demonstrated ultrasonographic variables at the first trimester transvaginal scan (TVS) which can assist in predicting outcomes by 12 weeks gestation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To validate the miscarriage risk prediction model (MRP) in women who present with a viable intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) at the primary ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A multi-centre diagnostic study of 1490 patients was performed between 2011 and 2019 for retrospective external and 2017-2019 for prospective temporal validation. The reference standard was a viable pregnancy at 12 + 6 weeks. The MRP model is a multinomial logistic regression model based on maternal age, embryonic heart rate, logarithm (gestational sac volume/crown-rump length (CRL)) ratio, CRL and presence or absence of clots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Temporal validation data from 290 viable IUPs were collected: 225 were viable at the end of the first trimester, 31 had miscarried and 34 were lost to follow-up. External validation data from 1203 viable IUPs were collected at two other ultrasound units: 1062 were viable, 69 had miscarried and 72 were lost to follow-up. Temporal validation with a cut-off of 0.1 demonstrated: area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8 (0.7-0.9), sensitivity 66.7%, specificity 83.9%, positive predictive value (PPV) 35.7%, negative predictive value (NPV) 94.9%, positive likelihood ration (LR+) 4.1 and negative LR (LR-) 0.4. External validation demonstrated: AUC 0.7 (0.7-0.8), sensitivity 44.9%, specificity 90.4%, PPV 23.3%, NPV 96.2%, LR+ 4.6 and LR- 0.6 (0.4-0.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MRP model is not able to be used in real time for counselling, and management should be individualised.</p>","PeriodicalId":55429,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13855","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Symptoms like vaginal bleeding or abdominal pain in early pregnancy can create anxiety about potential miscarriage. Previous studies have demonstrated ultrasonographic variables at the first trimester transvaginal scan (TVS) which can assist in predicting outcomes by 12 weeks gestation.

Aim: To validate the miscarriage risk prediction model (MRP) in women who present with a viable intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) at the primary ultrasound.

Materials and methods: A multi-centre diagnostic study of 1490 patients was performed between 2011 and 2019 for retrospective external and 2017-2019 for prospective temporal validation. The reference standard was a viable pregnancy at 12 + 6 weeks. The MRP model is a multinomial logistic regression model based on maternal age, embryonic heart rate, logarithm (gestational sac volume/crown-rump length (CRL)) ratio, CRL and presence or absence of clots.

Results: Temporal validation data from 290 viable IUPs were collected: 225 were viable at the end of the first trimester, 31 had miscarried and 34 were lost to follow-up. External validation data from 1203 viable IUPs were collected at two other ultrasound units: 1062 were viable, 69 had miscarried and 72 were lost to follow-up. Temporal validation with a cut-off of 0.1 demonstrated: area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8 (0.7-0.9), sensitivity 66.7%, specificity 83.9%, positive predictive value (PPV) 35.7%, negative predictive value (NPV) 94.9%, positive likelihood ration (LR+) 4.1 and negative LR (LR-) 0.4. External validation demonstrated: AUC 0.7 (0.7-0.8), sensitivity 44.9%, specificity 90.4%, PPV 23.3%, NPV 96.2%, LR+ 4.6 and LR- 0.6 (0.4-0.7).

Conclusion: The MRP model is not able to be used in real time for counselling, and management should be individualised.

对预测可存活妊娠头三个月结果的算法进行时间和外部验证。
背景:妊娠早期的阴道出血或腹痛等症状会使孕妇对潜在的流产产生焦虑。先前的研究表明,妊娠头三个月经阴道扫描(TVS)的超声波变量可帮助预测妊娠 12 周前的结果。目的:验证流产风险预测模型(MRP)在初次超声波检查出现存活宫内妊娠(IUP)的妇女中的应用:2011年至2019年期间对1490名患者进行了多中心诊断研究,以进行回顾性外部验证,2017年至2019年进行了前瞻性时间验证。参考标准为 12+6 周时的存活妊娠。MRP模型是基于母体年龄、胚胎心率、对数(妊娠囊体积/冠臀长度(CRL))比值、CRL和有无血块的多项式逻辑回归模型:收集了 290 个存活 IUP 的时间验证数据:225 个在妊娠头三个月末期存活,31 个流产,34 个失去随访。另外两家超声诊断机构收集了 1203 例存活 IUP 的外部验证数据:1062 例存活,69 例流产,72 例失去随访。截止值为 0.1 的时间验证结果显示:曲线下面积 (AUC) 为 0.8 (0.7-0.9),灵敏度为 66.7%,特异性为 83.9%,阳性预测值 (PPV) 为 35.7%,阴性预测值 (NPV) 为 94.9%,阳性似然比 (LR+) 为 4.1,阴性似然比 (LR-) 为 0.4。外部验证结果表明AUC为0.7(0.7-0.8),灵敏度为44.9%,特异度为90.4%,PPV为23.3%,NPV为96.2%,LR+为4.6,LR-为0.6(0.4-0.7):结论:MRP 模型不能用于实时咨询,应进行个性化管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
165
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ANZJOG) is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) and the RANZCOG Research foundation. ANZJOG aims to provide a medium for the publication of original contributions to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of obstetrics and gynaecology and related disciplines. Articles are peer reviewed by clinicians or researchers expert in the field of the submitted work. From time to time the journal will also publish printed abstracts from the RANZCOG Annual Scientific Meeting and meetings of relevant special interest groups, where the accepted abstracts have undergone the journals peer review acceptance process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信