Prescribing benzodiazepines in young adults with anxiety: a qualitative study of GP perspectives.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
British Journal of General Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-31 Print Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.3399/BJGP.2024.0211
Charlotte Archer, Nicola Wiles, David Kessler, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Katrina Turner
{"title":"Prescribing benzodiazepines in young adults with anxiety: a qualitative study of GP perspectives.","authors":"Charlotte Archer, Nicola Wiles, David Kessler, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Katrina Turner","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2024.0211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Incident benzodiazepine prescriptions in primary care for anxiety decreased between 2003 and 2018. However, from 2008, incident prescribing of benzodiazepines for anxiety increased among those aged 18-34 years. There are increasing concerns around prescribing of benzodiazepines. Further, although guidelines state benzodiazepines should only be prescribed short term, in 2017, 44% of incident prescriptions were prescribed for longer than the recommended duration of 2-4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To understand when and why GPs prescribe benzodiazepines for anxiety in young adults.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A qualitative study was undertaken using in-depth interviews with 17 GPs from 10 general practices in South West England.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Interviews were conducted by telephone or videocall. A topic guide was used to ensure consistency across interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and data analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GPs described caution in prescribing benzodiazepines for anxiety in young adults, but thought they had an important role in acute situations. GPs described caution in prescribing duration, but some thought longer-term prescriptions could be appropriate. In light of these views, some GPs questioned whether primary care needs to revisit how clinicians are using benzodiazepines. GPs perceived that some young adults requested benzodiazepines and suggested this might be because they wanted quick symptom relief. GPs noted that refusing to prescribe felt uncomfortable and that the number of young adults presenting to general practice, already dependent on benzodiazepines, had increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient-driven factors for prescribing benzodiazepines suggest there are current unmet treatment needs among young adults with anxiety. Given increases in prescribing in this age group, it may be timely to revisit the role of benzodiazepines in the management of people with anxiety in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":55320,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of General Practice","volume":" ","pages":"e742-e748"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11466293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of General Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2024.0211","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Incident benzodiazepine prescriptions in primary care for anxiety decreased between 2003 and 2018. However, from 2008, incident prescribing of benzodiazepines for anxiety increased among those aged 18-34 years. There are increasing concerns around prescribing of benzodiazepines. Further, although guidelines state benzodiazepines should only be prescribed short term, in 2017, 44% of incident prescriptions were prescribed for longer than the recommended duration of 2-4 weeks.

Aim: To understand when and why GPs prescribe benzodiazepines for anxiety in young adults.

Design and setting: A qualitative study was undertaken using in-depth interviews with 17 GPs from 10 general practices in South West England.

Method: Interviews were conducted by telephone or videocall. A topic guide was used to ensure consistency across interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and data analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: GPs described caution in prescribing benzodiazepines for anxiety in young adults, but thought they had an important role in acute situations. GPs described caution in prescribing duration, but some thought longer-term prescriptions could be appropriate. In light of these views, some GPs questioned whether primary care needs to revisit how clinicians are using benzodiazepines. GPs perceived that some young adults requested benzodiazepines and suggested this might be because they wanted quick symptom relief. GPs noted that refusing to prescribe felt uncomfortable and that the number of young adults presenting to general practice, already dependent on benzodiazepines, had increased.

Conclusion: Patient-driven factors for prescribing benzodiazepines suggest there are current unmet treatment needs among young adults with anxiety. Given increases in prescribing in this age group, it may be timely to revisit the role of benzodiazepines in the management of people with anxiety in primary care.

为患有焦虑症的年轻人开具苯二氮卓类药物处方:对全科医生观点的定性研究。
背景:2003-2018 年间,初级保健中因焦虑而开具的苯二氮卓类药物处方有所减少。然而,从 2008 年开始,在 18-34 岁的人群中,苯二氮卓类药物治疗焦虑症的处方量有所增加。人们越来越关注苯二氮卓类药物的处方问题。此外,尽管指南规定苯二氮卓类药物只能短期处方,但在2017年,44%的事件处方的处方时间超过了建议的2至4周。目的:了解全科医生何时及为何为年轻人开苯二氮卓类药物治疗焦虑症:对英格兰西南部十家诊所的 17 名全科医生进行深入访谈:访谈通过电话或视频电话进行。访谈采用主题指南,以确保访谈的一致性。对访谈进行录音、逐字记录,并使用反思性主题分析法对数据进行分析:全科医生在开具治疗青壮年焦虑症的苯二氮卓类药物处方时持谨慎态度,但认为它们在急性期有重要作用。全科医生在开具处方时谨慎对待处方的持续时间,但有些医生认为长期处方是合适的。全科医生认为一些年轻人要求使用苯二氮卓类药物,并认为这可能是因为他们希望快速缓解症状。全科医生指出,拒绝开处方让人感觉不舒服,而且已经依赖苯二氮卓类药物的年轻人到全科诊所就诊的人数有所增加:结论:开具苯二氮卓类药物处方的患者驱动因素表明,目前患有焦虑症的年轻人的治疗需求尚未得到满足。考虑到这一年龄段人群处方量的增加,重新审视苯二氮卓类药物在基层医疗机构焦虑症患者管理中的作用可能正逢其时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of General Practice
British Journal of General Practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.20%
发文量
681
期刊介绍: The British Journal of General Practice is an international journal publishing research, editorials, debate and analysis, and clinical guidance for family practitioners and primary care researchers worldwide. BJGP began in 1953 as the ‘College of General Practitioners’ Research Newsletter’, with the ‘Journal of the College of General Practitioners’ first appearing in 1960. Following the change in status of the College, the ‘Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners’ was launched in 1967. Three editors later, in 1990, the title was changed to the ‘British Journal of General Practice’. The journal is commonly referred to as the ''BJGP'', and is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信