PBPK-led assessment of antimalarial drugs as candidates for Covid-19: Simulating concentrations at the site of action to inform repurposing strategies

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Nada Abla, Lisa M. Almond, Jennifer J. Bonner, Naomi Richardson, Timothy N. C. Wells, Jörg J. Möhrle
{"title":"PBPK-led assessment of antimalarial drugs as candidates for Covid-19: Simulating concentrations at the site of action to inform repurposing strategies","authors":"Nada Abla,&nbsp;Lisa M. Almond,&nbsp;Jennifer J. Bonner,&nbsp;Naomi Richardson,&nbsp;Timothy N. C. Wells,&nbsp;Jörg J. Möhrle","doi":"10.1111/cts.13865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The urgent need for safe, efficacious, and accessible drug treatments to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prompted a global effort to evaluate drug repurposing opportunities. Pyronaridine and amodiaquine are both components of approved antimalarials with in vitro activity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In vitro activity does not always translate to clinical efficacy across a therapeutic dose range. This study applied available, verified, physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for pyronaridine, amodiaquine, and its active metabolite N-desethylamodiaquine (DEAQ) to predict drug concentrations in lung tissue relative to plasma or blood in the default healthy virtual population. Lung exposures were compared to published data across the reported range of in vitro EC<sub>50</sub> values against SARS-CoV-2. In the multicompartment permeability-limited PBPK model, the predicted total <i>C</i><sub>max</sub> in lung mass for pyronaridine was 34.2 μM on Day 3, 30.5-fold greater than in blood (1.12 μM) and for amodiaquine was 0.530 μM, 8.83-fold greater than in plasma (0.060 μM). In the perfusion-limited PBPK model, the DEAQ predicted total <i>C</i><sub>max</sub> on Day 3 in lung mass (30.2 μM) was 21.4-fold greater than for plasma (1.41 μM). Based on the available in vitro data, predicted drug concentrations in lung tissue for pyronaridine and DEAQ, but not amodiaquine, appeared sufficient to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication. Simulations indicated standard dosing regimens of pyronaridine-artesunate and artesunate-amodiaquine have potential to treat COVID-19. These findings informed repurposing strategies to select the most relevant compounds for clinical investigation in COVID-19. Clinical data for model verification may become available from ongoing clinical studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.13865","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.13865","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The urgent need for safe, efficacious, and accessible drug treatments to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) prompted a global effort to evaluate drug repurposing opportunities. Pyronaridine and amodiaquine are both components of approved antimalarials with in vitro activity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). In vitro activity does not always translate to clinical efficacy across a therapeutic dose range. This study applied available, verified, physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models for pyronaridine, amodiaquine, and its active metabolite N-desethylamodiaquine (DEAQ) to predict drug concentrations in lung tissue relative to plasma or blood in the default healthy virtual population. Lung exposures were compared to published data across the reported range of in vitro EC50 values against SARS-CoV-2. In the multicompartment permeability-limited PBPK model, the predicted total Cmax in lung mass for pyronaridine was 34.2 μM on Day 3, 30.5-fold greater than in blood (1.12 μM) and for amodiaquine was 0.530 μM, 8.83-fold greater than in plasma (0.060 μM). In the perfusion-limited PBPK model, the DEAQ predicted total Cmax on Day 3 in lung mass (30.2 μM) was 21.4-fold greater than for plasma (1.41 μM). Based on the available in vitro data, predicted drug concentrations in lung tissue for pyronaridine and DEAQ, but not amodiaquine, appeared sufficient to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication. Simulations indicated standard dosing regimens of pyronaridine-artesunate and artesunate-amodiaquine have potential to treat COVID-19. These findings informed repurposing strategies to select the most relevant compounds for clinical investigation in COVID-19. Clinical data for model verification may become available from ongoing clinical studies.

Abstract Image

以 PBPK 为主导评估作为 Covid-19 候选药物的抗疟药物:模拟作用部位的浓度,为再利用战略提供信息。
治疗 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)急需安全、有效和可获得的药物治疗,这促使全球努力评估药物再利用的机会。吡咯烷酮和阿莫地喹都是已获批准的抗疟药物成分,对严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)具有体外活性。体外活性并不总能转化为治疗剂量范围内的临床疗效。本研究应用现有的、经过验证的、基于生理的药代动力学(PBPK)模型来预测吡咯烷酮、阿莫地喹及其活性代谢物 N-去乙基阿莫地喹(DEAQ)在默认健康虚拟人群肺组织中相对于血浆或血液的药物浓度。肺部暴露量与已公布的数据进行了比较,这些数据涵盖了所报告的体外抗 SARS-CoV-2 EC50 值范围。在多室渗透限制 PBPK 模型中,第 3 天肺部对吡咯那啶的预测总 Cmax 为 34.2 μM,是血液(1.12 μM)的 30.5 倍,对阿莫地喹的预测总 Cmax 为 0.530 μM,是血浆(0.060 μM)的 8.83 倍。在灌注限制的 PBPK 模型中,第 3 天 DEAQ 预测的肺部总 Cmax(30.2 μM)是血浆(1.41 μM)的 21.4 倍。根据现有的体外数据,预测肺组织中吡咯那啶和 DEAQ 的药物浓度似乎足以抑制 SARS-CoV-2 的复制,但阿莫地喹的药物浓度则不够。模拟结果表明,吡咯那啶-青蒿琥酯和青蒿琥酯-阿莫地喹的标准给药方案具有治疗 COVID-19 的潜力。这些研究结果为选择最适合 COVID-19 临床研究的化合物的再利用策略提供了依据。正在进行的临床研究可能会提供用于模型验证的临床数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信