Telerehabilitation for New Wheelchair Evaluations: A Retrospective Study of Patient Characteristics.

IF 2.5 Q1 REHABILITATION
International Journal of Telerehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-06-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5195/ijt.2024.6630
Chelsea McClammer, Elizabeth A Choma, Richard M Schein, Mark R Schmeler, Gede Pramana, Jake Gliniak, Corey Morrow
{"title":"Telerehabilitation for New Wheelchair Evaluations: A Retrospective Study of Patient Characteristics.","authors":"Chelsea McClammer, Elizabeth A Choma, Richard M Schein, Mark R Schmeler, Gede Pramana, Jake Gliniak, Corey Morrow","doi":"10.5195/ijt.2024.6630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this paper was to describe the clinical and personal factors of persons with disabilities (PwD) seeking a new wheelchair evaluation via telerehabilitation compared to in-person appointments. This retrospective cohort analysis used the Functional Mobility Assessment and Uniform Dataset, which is a nationwide registry with ongoing enrollment at 31 clinical sites of PwD seeking a new wheelchair evaluation. PwD were stratified into either a Telerehabilitation Group or In-Person Group. There were 1,669 PwD in the Telerehabilitation Group and 10,284 in the In-Person Group. The Telerehabilitation Group had a higher mean age and higher percentage of Progressively Acquired Disabilities than the In-Person Group. This project lays the groundwork for future comparative effectiveness studies, which may influence telerehabilitation reimbursement policies for wheelchair services.</p>","PeriodicalId":45323,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Telerehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11249835/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Telerehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/ijt.2024.6630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to describe the clinical and personal factors of persons with disabilities (PwD) seeking a new wheelchair evaluation via telerehabilitation compared to in-person appointments. This retrospective cohort analysis used the Functional Mobility Assessment and Uniform Dataset, which is a nationwide registry with ongoing enrollment at 31 clinical sites of PwD seeking a new wheelchair evaluation. PwD were stratified into either a Telerehabilitation Group or In-Person Group. There were 1,669 PwD in the Telerehabilitation Group and 10,284 in the In-Person Group. The Telerehabilitation Group had a higher mean age and higher percentage of Progressively Acquired Disabilities than the In-Person Group. This project lays the groundwork for future comparative effectiveness studies, which may influence telerehabilitation reimbursement policies for wheelchair services.

用于新轮椅评估的远程康复技术:患者特征的回顾性研究。
本文旨在描述残疾人(PwD)通过远程康复寻求新轮椅评估的临床和个人因素,并将其与面对面预约进行比较。这项回顾性队列分析使用了功能移动性评估和统一数据集,该数据集是一个全国范围的登记册,在 31 个临床站点持续登记寻求新轮椅评估的残疾人。残疾人被分为远程康复组和亲临现场组。远程康复组有 1,669 名残疾人,亲临现场组有 10,284 名残疾人。远程康复组的平均年龄和渐进性获得性残疾的比例均高于亲身参与组。该项目为未来的比较效果研究奠定了基础,可能会影响轮椅服务的远程康复报销政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
14
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信