Hongyu Zhao, Luozhifei Zhou, Ling Hu, Ru Chen, Lei Dong, Qin Zhao, Lina Gong
{"title":"Summary of best evidence for rehabilitation management of patients with motor dysfunction after stroke.","authors":"Hongyu Zhao, Luozhifei Zhou, Ling Hu, Ru Chen, Lei Dong, Qin Zhao, Lina Gong","doi":"10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2024.240006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The rehabilitation work for patients with motor dysfunction after stroke is crucial. However, there is currently a lack of summarized evidence regarding the rehabilitation management of stroke patients in rehabilitation wards, communities, and at home. This study aims to compile relevant evidence on the rehabilitation management of patients with motor dysfunction after stroke, providing a reference for clinical and community health professionals to carry out rehabilitation interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in BMJ Best Practice, UpToDate, National Guidebook Clearinghouse, American Heart Association/American Stroke Association, Canadian Medical Association, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, United States Department of Veterans Affairs/ Department of Defense, Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, JBI Evidence-Based Healthcare Center Database, The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, CNKI, Wanfang Database, SinoMed, and other databases for all literature on the rehabilitation management of patients with motor dysfunction after stroke. This included clinical decision-making, guidelines, expert consensuses, recommended practices, systematic reviews, and evidence summaries, with the search period spanning from the establishment of each database to October 2023. Two researchers independently evaluated the quality of the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of twenty-one documents were included, consisting of 11 guidelines, 2 expert consensus, and 8 systematic reviews. Evidence was extracted and integrated from the included literature, summarizing forty-five pieces of evidence across nine areas: rehabilitation management model, rehabilitation institutions, rehabilitation teams, timing of rehabilitation interventions, rehabilitation assessment, rehabilitation programs, rehabilitation duration and frequency, rehabilitation intensity, and rehabilitation support These covered comprehensive rehabilitation management content for stroke patients in the early, subacute, and chronic phases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The best evidence summarized in this study for the rehabilitation management of patients with motor dysfunction after stroke is comprehensive and of high quality. It provides important guidance for clinical and community healthcare professionals in carrying out rehabilitation interventions. When applying the evidence, it is recommended to consider the current condition of the stroke patient, the extent of motor dysfunction, environmental factors, and the patient's preferences. Then, select the most appropriate rehabilitation plan, and adjust the type and intensity of training according to each patient's specific needs and preferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":39801,"journal":{"name":"中南大学学报(医学版)","volume":"49 4","pages":"497-507"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11255183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中南大学学报(医学版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2024.240006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The rehabilitation work for patients with motor dysfunction after stroke is crucial. However, there is currently a lack of summarized evidence regarding the rehabilitation management of stroke patients in rehabilitation wards, communities, and at home. This study aims to compile relevant evidence on the rehabilitation management of patients with motor dysfunction after stroke, providing a reference for clinical and community health professionals to carry out rehabilitation interventions.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted in BMJ Best Practice, UpToDate, National Guidebook Clearinghouse, American Heart Association/American Stroke Association, Canadian Medical Association, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, United States Department of Veterans Affairs/ Department of Defense, Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, JBI Evidence-Based Healthcare Center Database, The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, CNKI, Wanfang Database, SinoMed, and other databases for all literature on the rehabilitation management of patients with motor dysfunction after stroke. This included clinical decision-making, guidelines, expert consensuses, recommended practices, systematic reviews, and evidence summaries, with the search period spanning from the establishment of each database to October 2023. Two researchers independently evaluated the quality of the literature.
Results: A total of twenty-one documents were included, consisting of 11 guidelines, 2 expert consensus, and 8 systematic reviews. Evidence was extracted and integrated from the included literature, summarizing forty-five pieces of evidence across nine areas: rehabilitation management model, rehabilitation institutions, rehabilitation teams, timing of rehabilitation interventions, rehabilitation assessment, rehabilitation programs, rehabilitation duration and frequency, rehabilitation intensity, and rehabilitation support These covered comprehensive rehabilitation management content for stroke patients in the early, subacute, and chronic phases.
Conclusions: The best evidence summarized in this study for the rehabilitation management of patients with motor dysfunction after stroke is comprehensive and of high quality. It provides important guidance for clinical and community healthcare professionals in carrying out rehabilitation interventions. When applying the evidence, it is recommended to consider the current condition of the stroke patient, the extent of motor dysfunction, environmental factors, and the patient's preferences. Then, select the most appropriate rehabilitation plan, and adjust the type and intensity of training according to each patient's specific needs and preferences.
目的:脑卒中后运动功能障碍患者的康复工作至关重要。然而,目前关于脑卒中患者在康复病房、社区和家庭中的康复管理缺乏总结性证据。本研究旨在总结脑卒中后运动功能障碍患者康复管理的相关证据,为临床和社区医护人员开展康复干预提供参考:方法:在 BMJ Best Practice、UpToDate、National Guidebook Clearinghouse、American Heart Association/American Stroke Association、Canadian Medical Association、National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence、United States Department of Veterans Affairs/ Department of Defense、Registered Nurses Association of Ontario、JBI Evidence-Based Healthcare Center Database、The Cochrane Library、PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、CINAHL、CNKI、Wanfang Database、SinoMed 等数据库中对所有有关脑卒中后运动功能障碍患者康复管理的文献进行了系统检索。其中包括临床决策、指南、专家共识、推荐实践、系统综述和证据摘要,检索时间跨度为各数据库建立后至 2023 年 10 月。两名研究人员独立评估了文献的质量:共纳入 21 篇文献,包括 11 份指南、2 份专家共识和 8 份系统综述。从收录的文献中提取并整合了 45 项证据,总结了九个方面的内容:康复管理模式、康复机构、康复团队、康复干预时机、康复评估、康复计划、康复持续时间和频率、康复强度和康复支持,涵盖了脑卒中患者早期、亚急性期和慢性期的综合康复管理内容:本研究总结的有关脑卒中后运动功能障碍患者康复管理的最佳证据是全面且高质量的。它为临床和社区医护人员实施康复干预提供了重要指导。在应用证据时,建议考虑脑卒中患者目前的状况、运动功能障碍的程度、环境因素以及患者的偏好。然后选择最合适的康复计划,并根据每位患者的具体需求和偏好调整训练的类型和强度。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Central South University (Medical Sciences), founded in 1958, is a comprehensive academic journal of medicine and health sponsored by the Ministry of Education and Central South University. The journal has been included in many important databases and authoritative abstract journals at home and abroad, such as the American Medline, Pubmed and its Index Medicus (IM), the Netherlands Medical Abstracts (EM), the American Chemical Abstracts (CA), the WHO Western Pacific Region Medical Index (WPRIM), and the Chinese Science Citation Database (Core Database) (CSCD); it is a statistical source journal of Chinese scientific and technological papers, a Chinese core journal, and a "double-effect" journal of the Chinese Journal Matrix; it is the "2nd, 3rd, and 4th China University Excellent Science and Technology Journal", "2008 China Excellent Science and Technology Journal", "RCCSE China Authoritative Academic Journal (A+)" and Hunan Province's "Top Ten Science and Technology Journals". The purpose of the journal is to reflect the new achievements, new technologies, and new experiences in medical research, medical treatment, and teaching, report new medical trends at home and abroad, promote academic exchanges, improve academic standards, and promote scientific and technological progress.