Prophylactic muscle flaps in high-risk-for-poor-healing patients with prosthetic bypasses increases deep wound complications.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
World Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1002/wjs.12296
Samyuktha Ravikumar, Renxi Li, Jamie Thompson, Emanuela C Peshel, Melina Recarey, Richard Amdur, Salim Lala, John Ricotta, Anton Sidawy, Bao-Ngoc Nguyen
{"title":"Prophylactic muscle flaps in high-risk-for-poor-healing patients with prosthetic bypasses increases deep wound complications.","authors":"Samyuktha Ravikumar, Renxi Li, Jamie Thompson, Emanuela C Peshel, Melina Recarey, Richard Amdur, Salim Lala, John Ricotta, Anton Sidawy, Bao-Ngoc Nguyen","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Incisional complications of groin after inflow or infrainguinal bypasses with prosthetic conduits can result in major morbidities that require reoperation, infected graft removal, and limb loss. Muscle flaps are typically performed to treat groin wound complications, but they are also done prophylactically at the time of index procedures in certain high-risk-for-poor-healing patients to mitigate anticipated groin wound complications. We used a nationwide multi-institutional database to investigate outcomes of prophylactic muscle flaps in high-risk patients who underwent prosthetic bypasses involving femoral anastomosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized ACS-NSQIP database 2005-2021 to identify all elective inflow and infrainguinal bypasses that involve femoral anastomoses. Only high-risk patients for poor incisional healing who underwent prosthetic conduit bypasses were selected. A 1:3 propensity-matching was performed to obtain two comparable studied groups between those with (FLAP) and without prophylactic muscle flaps (NOFLAP) based on demographics and comorbidities. 30-day postoperative outcomes were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 35,011 NOFLAP, 990 of them were propensity-matched to 330 FLAP. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality, MACE, pulmonary, or renal complications. FLAP was associated with higher bleeding requiring transfusion, longer operative time, and longer hospital stay. FLAP also had higher overall wound complications (15.2% vs. 10.6%; p = 0.03), especially deep incisional infection (4.9% vs. 2.4%; p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prophylactic muscle flap for prosthetic bypasses involving femoral anastomosis in high-risk-for-poor-healing patients does not appear to mitigate 30-day wound complications. Caution should be exercised with this practice and more long-term data should be obtained to determine whether prophylactic flaps decrease the incidence of graft infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2543-2550"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12296","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Incisional complications of groin after inflow or infrainguinal bypasses with prosthetic conduits can result in major morbidities that require reoperation, infected graft removal, and limb loss. Muscle flaps are typically performed to treat groin wound complications, but they are also done prophylactically at the time of index procedures in certain high-risk-for-poor-healing patients to mitigate anticipated groin wound complications. We used a nationwide multi-institutional database to investigate outcomes of prophylactic muscle flaps in high-risk patients who underwent prosthetic bypasses involving femoral anastomosis.

Methods: We utilized ACS-NSQIP database 2005-2021 to identify all elective inflow and infrainguinal bypasses that involve femoral anastomoses. Only high-risk patients for poor incisional healing who underwent prosthetic conduit bypasses were selected. A 1:3 propensity-matching was performed to obtain two comparable studied groups between those with (FLAP) and without prophylactic muscle flaps (NOFLAP) based on demographics and comorbidities. 30-day postoperative outcomes were compared.

Results: Among 35,011 NOFLAP, 990 of them were propensity-matched to 330 FLAP. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality, MACE, pulmonary, or renal complications. FLAP was associated with higher bleeding requiring transfusion, longer operative time, and longer hospital stay. FLAP also had higher overall wound complications (15.2% vs. 10.6%; p = 0.03), especially deep incisional infection (4.9% vs. 2.4%; p = 0.04).

Conclusion: Prophylactic muscle flap for prosthetic bypasses involving femoral anastomosis in high-risk-for-poor-healing patients does not appear to mitigate 30-day wound complications. Caution should be exercised with this practice and more long-term data should be obtained to determine whether prophylactic flaps decrease the incidence of graft infection.

对假体搭桥术后愈合不良的高风险患者进行预防性肌肉瓣治疗会增加深部伤口并发症。
背景:使用人工导管进行腹股沟入路或腹股沟下旁路手术后,切口并发症可能导致需要再次手术、移植物感染切除和肢体缺失等重大疾病。肌肉瓣通常用于治疗腹股沟伤口并发症,但也会在某些愈合不良的高风险患者进行指数手术时进行预防性处理,以减轻预期的腹股沟伤口并发症。我们利用一个全国性的多机构数据库,对接受假体搭桥术(涉及股骨吻合术)的高风险患者进行预防性肌肉瓣治疗的结果进行了调查:我们利用2005-2021年ACS-NSQIP数据库,确定了所有涉及股骨吻合的择期入路和腹股沟内搭桥术。只有切口愈合不良的高风险患者才会接受人工导管旁路手术。根据人口统计学和并发症,进行了1:3倾向匹配,以获得两个具有可比性的研究组,即有预防性肌肉瓣(FLAP)和无预防性肌肉瓣(NOFLAP)的研究组。对术后 30 天的结果进行了比较:在 35011 例 NOFLAP 中,990 例与 330 例 FLAP 进行了倾向匹配。30天死亡率、MACE、肺部或肾部并发症无明显差异。FLAP 需要输血的出血量更高,手术时间更长,住院时间更长。FLAP的总体伤口并发症也较高(15.2% vs. 10.6%; p = 0.03),尤其是切口深部感染(4.9% vs. 2.4%; p = 0.04):结论:对愈合不良的高风险患者进行涉及股骨吻合的人工旁路手术时,预防性肌皮瓣似乎并不能减轻30天的伤口并发症。应谨慎使用这种方法,并获取更多长期数据,以确定预防性肌瓣是否能降低移植物感染的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信