Opioid and non-opioid analgesic regimens after fracture and risk of serious opioid-related events.

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open Pub Date : 2024-07-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/tsaco-2024-001364
Kyle Hart, Andrew J Medvecz, Avi Vaidya, Stacie Dusetzina, Ashley A Leech, Andrew D Wiese
{"title":"Opioid and non-opioid analgesic regimens after fracture and risk of serious opioid-related events.","authors":"Kyle Hart, Andrew J Medvecz, Avi Vaidya, Stacie Dusetzina, Ashley A Leech, Andrew D Wiese","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2024-001364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Non-opioid analgesics are prescribed in combination with opioids among patients with long bone fracture to reduce opioid prescribing needs, yet evidence is limited on whether they reduce the risk of serious opioid-related events (SOREs). We compared the risk of SOREs among hospitalized patients with long bone fracture discharged with filled opioid prescriptions, with and without non-opioid analgesics.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We identified a retrospective cohort of analgesic-naïve adult patients with a long bone fracture hospitalization using the Merative MarketScan Commercial Database (2013-2020). The exposure was opioid and non-opioid analgesic (gabapentinoids, muscle relaxants, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen) prescriptions filled in the 3 days before through 42 days after discharge. The outcome was the development of new persistent opioid use or opioid use disorder during follow-up (day 43 through day 408 after discharge). We used Cox proportional hazards regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting with overlap trimming to compare outcomes among those that filled an opioid and a non-opioid analgesic to those that filled only an opioid analgesic. In secondary analyses, we used separate models to compare those that filled a prescription for each specific non-opioid analgesic type with opioids to those that filled only opioids.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 29 489 patients, most filled an opioid prescription alone (58.4%) or an opioid and non-opioid (22.0%). In the weighted proportional hazards regression model accounting for relevant covariates and total MME, filling both a non-opioid analgesic and an opioid analgesic was associated with 1.63 times increased risk of SOREs compared with filling an opioid analgesic only (95% CI 1.41 to 1.89). Filling a gabapentin prescription in combination with an opioid was associated with an increased risk of SOREs compared with those that filled an opioid only (adjusted HR: 1.84 (95% CI1.48 to 2.27)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Filling a non-opioid analgesic in combination with an opioid was associated with an increased risk of SOREs after long bone fracture.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, prognostic/epidemiological.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"9 1","pages":"e001364"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11253739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2024-001364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Non-opioid analgesics are prescribed in combination with opioids among patients with long bone fracture to reduce opioid prescribing needs, yet evidence is limited on whether they reduce the risk of serious opioid-related events (SOREs). We compared the risk of SOREs among hospitalized patients with long bone fracture discharged with filled opioid prescriptions, with and without non-opioid analgesics.

Design: We identified a retrospective cohort of analgesic-naïve adult patients with a long bone fracture hospitalization using the Merative MarketScan Commercial Database (2013-2020). The exposure was opioid and non-opioid analgesic (gabapentinoids, muscle relaxants, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen) prescriptions filled in the 3 days before through 42 days after discharge. The outcome was the development of new persistent opioid use or opioid use disorder during follow-up (day 43 through day 408 after discharge). We used Cox proportional hazards regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting with overlap trimming to compare outcomes among those that filled an opioid and a non-opioid analgesic to those that filled only an opioid analgesic. In secondary analyses, we used separate models to compare those that filled a prescription for each specific non-opioid analgesic type with opioids to those that filled only opioids.

Results: Of 29 489 patients, most filled an opioid prescription alone (58.4%) or an opioid and non-opioid (22.0%). In the weighted proportional hazards regression model accounting for relevant covariates and total MME, filling both a non-opioid analgesic and an opioid analgesic was associated with 1.63 times increased risk of SOREs compared with filling an opioid analgesic only (95% CI 1.41 to 1.89). Filling a gabapentin prescription in combination with an opioid was associated with an increased risk of SOREs compared with those that filled an opioid only (adjusted HR: 1.84 (95% CI1.48 to 2.27)).

Conclusions: Filling a non-opioid analgesic in combination with an opioid was associated with an increased risk of SOREs after long bone fracture.

Level of evidence: Level III, prognostic/epidemiological.

Study type: Retrospective cohort study.

骨折后阿片类和非阿片类镇痛方案与阿片类药物相关严重事件的风险。
背景:长骨骨折患者在处方阿片类药物时会同时使用非阿片类镇痛药,以减少阿片类药物的处方需求,但关于非阿片类镇痛药是否能降低严重阿片类药物相关事件(SORE)风险的证据却很有限。我们比较了已开具阿片类药物处方的长骨骨折住院患者出院时使用和不使用非阿片类镇痛药发生 SORE 的风险:设计:我们利用 Merative MarketScan 商业数据库(2013-2020 年)确定了长骨骨折住院患者中未使用镇痛剂的成人回顾性队列。研究对象为出院前 3 天至出院后 42 天内开具的阿片类和非阿片类镇痛药(加巴喷丁类、肌肉松弛剂、非甾体抗炎药、对乙酰氨基酚)处方。结果是在随访期间(出院后第 43 天至第 408 天)出现新的阿片类药物持续使用或阿片类药物使用障碍。我们使用了带有重叠修剪的逆治疗概率加权的 Cox 比例危险度回归,以比较使用了阿片类药物和非阿片类药物镇痛剂的患者与仅使用了阿片类药物镇痛剂的患者的治疗结果。在二次分析中,我们使用了不同的模型来比较开具了阿片类和非阿片类镇痛药处方的患者与只开具了阿片类处方的患者:在 29 489 名患者中,大多数人只开了阿片类药物处方(58.4%)或阿片类药物和非阿片类药物处方(22.0%)。在考虑了相关协变量和总 MME 的加权比例危险度回归模型中,与仅使用阿片类镇痛药相比,同时使用非阿片类镇痛药和阿片类镇痛药的 SORE 风险增加了 1.63 倍(95% CI 1.41 至 1.89)。与仅使用阿片类镇痛药的患者相比,同时使用加巴喷丁和阿片类镇痛药的患者发生 SORE 的风险增加(调整后 HR:1.84(95% CI1.48 至 2.27)):结论:在使用阿片类镇痛药的同时使用非阿片类镇痛药与长骨骨折后发生SORE的风险增加有关:研究类型:回顾性队列研究:研究类型:回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信