Study of pediatric appendicitis scores and management strategies: A prospective observational feasibility study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Academic Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1111/acem.14985
Wei Hao Lee, Sharon O'Brien, Elizabeth McKinnon, Michael Collin, Stuart R Dalziel, Simon S Craig, Meredith L Borland
{"title":"Study of pediatric appendicitis scores and management strategies: A prospective observational feasibility study.","authors":"Wei Hao Lee, Sharon O'Brien, Elizabeth McKinnon, Michael Collin, Stuart R Dalziel, Simon S Craig, Meredith L Borland","doi":"10.1111/acem.14985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to investigate the feasibility of prospectively validating multiple clinical prediction scores (CPSs) for pediatric appendicitis in an Australian pediatric emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted to identify potential CPSs and a single-center prospective observational feasibility study was performed between November 2022 and May 2023 to evaluate the performance of identified CPSs. Children 5-15 years presenting with acute right-sided or generalized abdominal pain and clinician suspicion of appendicitis were included. CPSs were calculated by the study team from prospectively clinician-collected data and/or review of medical records. Accuracy of CPSs were assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and proportions correctly identifiable as either low-risk or high-risk with the best performing CPS compared to clinician gestalt. Final diagnosis of appendicitis was confirmed on histopathology or by telephone/email follow-up for those discharged directly from ED.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty CPSs were identified in the literature search and 481 patients were enrolled in the study. A total of 150 (31.2%) patients underwent appendectomy with three (2.0%) having a normal appendix on histopathology. All identified CPSs were calculable for at least 50% of the patient cohort. The pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator for pediatric EDs (pARC-ED; n = 317) was the best performing CPS with AUC 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-0.94) and specificity 99.0% (95% CI 96.4%-99.7%) in diagnosing high-risk cases and a misclassification rate of 4.5% for low-risk cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study identified 30 CPSs that could be validated in a majority of patients to compare their ability to assess risk of pediatric appendicitis. The pARC-ED had the highest predictive accuracy and can potentially assist in risk stratification of children with suspected appendicitis in pediatric EDs. A multicenter study is now under way to evaluate the potential of these CPSs in a broader range of EDs to aid clinical decision making in more varied settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1089-1099"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.14985","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective was to investigate the feasibility of prospectively validating multiple clinical prediction scores (CPSs) for pediatric appendicitis in an Australian pediatric emergency department (ED).

Methods: A literature search was conducted to identify potential CPSs and a single-center prospective observational feasibility study was performed between November 2022 and May 2023 to evaluate the performance of identified CPSs. Children 5-15 years presenting with acute right-sided or generalized abdominal pain and clinician suspicion of appendicitis were included. CPSs were calculated by the study team from prospectively clinician-collected data and/or review of medical records. Accuracy of CPSs were assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and proportions correctly identifiable as either low-risk or high-risk with the best performing CPS compared to clinician gestalt. Final diagnosis of appendicitis was confirmed on histopathology or by telephone/email follow-up for those discharged directly from ED.

Results: Thirty CPSs were identified in the literature search and 481 patients were enrolled in the study. A total of 150 (31.2%) patients underwent appendectomy with three (2.0%) having a normal appendix on histopathology. All identified CPSs were calculable for at least 50% of the patient cohort. The pediatric Appendicitis Risk Calculator for pediatric EDs (pARC-ED; n = 317) was the best performing CPS with AUC 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-0.94) and specificity 99.0% (95% CI 96.4%-99.7%) in diagnosing high-risk cases and a misclassification rate of 4.5% for low-risk cases.

Conclusions: The study identified 30 CPSs that could be validated in a majority of patients to compare their ability to assess risk of pediatric appendicitis. The pARC-ED had the highest predictive accuracy and can potentially assist in risk stratification of children with suspected appendicitis in pediatric EDs. A multicenter study is now under way to evaluate the potential of these CPSs in a broader range of EDs to aid clinical decision making in more varied settings.

小儿阑尾炎评分和管理策略研究:前瞻性观察可行性研究。
目的目的是研究在澳大利亚儿科急诊科(ED)中对小儿阑尾炎的多个临床预测评分(CPS)进行前瞻性验证的可行性:方法: 通过文献检索确定潜在的 CPS,并于 2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 5 月期间开展了一项单中心前瞻性观察可行性研究,以评估已确定的 CPS 的性能。研究对象包括 5-15 岁、出现急性右侧或全身腹痛、临床医生怀疑为阑尾炎的儿童。CPS 由研究小组根据临床医生前瞻性收集的数据和/或审查病历计算得出。CPS的准确性通过接收器操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)进行评估,并与临床医生的酝酿法相比,用表现最佳的CPS正确识别出低危或高危的比例。对于直接从急诊室出院的患者,阑尾炎的最终诊断由组织病理学或电话/电子邮件随访确认:在文献检索中发现了 30 种 CPS,481 名患者参与了研究。共有 150 名(31.2%)患者接受了阑尾切除术,其中 3 名(2.0%)患者的阑尾组织病理学结果正常。所有已确定的 CPS 至少有 50% 的患者可以计算。用于儿科急诊室的小儿阑尾炎风险计算器(pARC-ED;n = 317)是性能最好的CPS,其AUC为0.90(95%置信区间[CI] 0.86-0.94),诊断高风险病例的特异性为99.0%(95% CI 96.4%-99.7%),低风险病例的误诊率为4.5%:该研究确定了 30 种 CPS,可在大多数患者中进行验证,以比较其评估小儿阑尾炎风险的能力。pARC-ED的预测准确率最高,有可能帮助儿科急诊室对疑似阑尾炎患儿进行风险分层。目前正在进行一项多中心研究,以评估这些 CPS 在更广泛的急诊室中的应用潜力,从而在更多样的环境中帮助临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信