Enabling interdisciplinary research capacity for sustainable development: self-evaluation of the Blue Communities project in the UK and Southeast Asia.

UCL open environment Pub Date : 2024-07-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.14324/111.444/ucloe.1970
Fiona Culhane, Victoria Cheung, Melanie Austen
{"title":"Enabling interdisciplinary research capacity for sustainable development: self-evaluation of the Blue Communities project in the UK and Southeast Asia.","authors":"Fiona Culhane, Victoria Cheung, Melanie Austen","doi":"10.14324/111.444/ucloe.1970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Global challenges such as climate change, food security and human health and well-being disproportionately impact people from low-income countries. These challenges are complex and require an international and transdisciplinary approach to research, with research skills and expertise from different disciplines, sectors and regions. In addressing this, a key goal of the research project, Blue Communities, was to create and expand mutual interdisciplinary capacity of both United Kingdom and Southeast Asian Partners. An existing questionnaire on research capacity was uniquely adapted to include interdisciplinary and international aspects and distributed for the first time as an online survey to the participants of the Blue Communities project comprising researchers across all career stages. Participants were asked about their perceptions of the research capacity and culture of their organisation, team and self and whether they believed any aspects have changed since their involvement with the project. Greatest improvement was seen at the self-level where results indicated a positive relationship between an individual's current success or skill and their improvement over the course of the research project across 18 out of 22 aspects of research capacity for Southeast Asian, and two for UK respondents. The conflict between achieving research aims, building research capacity and making societal impact was evident. Institutional support is required to value these core aspects of interdisciplinary research.</p>","PeriodicalId":75271,"journal":{"name":"UCL open environment","volume":"6 ","pages":"e1970"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11249699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UCL open environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444/ucloe.1970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global challenges such as climate change, food security and human health and well-being disproportionately impact people from low-income countries. These challenges are complex and require an international and transdisciplinary approach to research, with research skills and expertise from different disciplines, sectors and regions. In addressing this, a key goal of the research project, Blue Communities, was to create and expand mutual interdisciplinary capacity of both United Kingdom and Southeast Asian Partners. An existing questionnaire on research capacity was uniquely adapted to include interdisciplinary and international aspects and distributed for the first time as an online survey to the participants of the Blue Communities project comprising researchers across all career stages. Participants were asked about their perceptions of the research capacity and culture of their organisation, team and self and whether they believed any aspects have changed since their involvement with the project. Greatest improvement was seen at the self-level where results indicated a positive relationship between an individual's current success or skill and their improvement over the course of the research project across 18 out of 22 aspects of research capacity for Southeast Asian, and two for UK respondents. The conflict between achieving research aims, building research capacity and making societal impact was evident. Institutional support is required to value these core aspects of interdisciplinary research.

提高跨学科研究能力,促进可持续发展:英国和东南亚蓝色社区项目的自我评估。
气候变化、粮食安全、人类健康和福祉等全球性挑战对低收入国家的人民造成了极大的影响。这些挑战错综复杂,需要采用国际和跨学科的研究方法,利用来自不同学科、部门和地区的研究技能和专业知识。为了解决这个问题,研究项目 "蓝色社区 "的一个关键目标是建立和扩大联合王国和东南亚合作伙伴的跨学科能力。对现有的研究能力调查问卷进行了独特的调整,以纳入跨学科和国际方面的内容,并首次以在线调查的形式分发给蓝色社区项目的参与者,其中包括各个职业阶段的研究人员。调查询问了参与者对其所在组织、团队和自我的研究能力和文化的看法,以及他们是否认为自参与该项目以来任何方面都发生了变化。结果显示,在东南亚受访者研究能力的 22 个方面中,有 18 个方面的个人目前的成功或技能与他们在研究项目过程中的进步之间存在正相关关系,而在英国受访者的 22 个方面中,有两个方面的个人目前的成功或技能与他们在研究项目过程中的进步之间存在正相关关系。实现研究目标、建设研究能力和产生社会影响之间的冲突显而易见。要重视跨学科研究的这些核心方面,就需要机构的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信