Lack of Continuous Video EEG Surveillance Results in Delayed Event Reporting.

Q3 Health Professions
The Neurodiagnostic Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1080/21646821.2024.2375477
Olga Selioutski, Peggy Auinger, Michel Berg, Ramona Cranmer, Gretchen L Birbeck, Susan T Herman
{"title":"Lack of Continuous Video EEG Surveillance Results in Delayed Event Reporting.","authors":"Olga Selioutski, Peggy Auinger, Michel Berg, Ramona Cranmer, Gretchen L Birbeck, Susan T Herman","doi":"10.1080/21646821.2024.2375477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although real-time event detection during video EEG recording is required to ensure patients' safety, it is limited by the technologists' availability. We sought to explore the efficiency of real-time event detection by the EEG technologists in a single tertiary academic center. We retrospectively reviewed events from continuous inpatient video EEGs (cEEGs) and epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) recordings in January 2017, when real-time surveillance was only available during the night shift, and June 2017, when a dedicated neurodiagnostic EEG technologist was available for real-time monitoring during all shifts. The events were categorized into those detected immediately (eyes-on), later in the same shift (delayed) or identified on the subsequent shift (missed). Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used for statistical comparisons. In January 2017, there were 25 patients (117 days of monitoring) in the EMU and 54 inpatients (146 days of monitoring) on cEEG with 92 total events, (39% seizures). In June 2017, there were 30 patients (133 days of monitoring) in the EMU and 47 additional inpatients (80 days of monitoring) on cEEG with 110 total events, (39% seizures). The number of events identified in real time was low and did not significantly differ among shifts regardless of the availability of the monitoring technologist. Most events were identified at the time of subsequent EEG scanning by the EEG technologist. Partial staffing for continuous video EEG surveillance is insufficient to identify events in real time. EEG technologists are able to identify events during regular EEG scanning.</p>","PeriodicalId":22816,"journal":{"name":"The Neurodiagnostic Journal","volume":" ","pages":"122-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Neurodiagnostic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21646821.2024.2375477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although real-time event detection during video EEG recording is required to ensure patients' safety, it is limited by the technologists' availability. We sought to explore the efficiency of real-time event detection by the EEG technologists in a single tertiary academic center. We retrospectively reviewed events from continuous inpatient video EEGs (cEEGs) and epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) recordings in January 2017, when real-time surveillance was only available during the night shift, and June 2017, when a dedicated neurodiagnostic EEG technologist was available for real-time monitoring during all shifts. The events were categorized into those detected immediately (eyes-on), later in the same shift (delayed) or identified on the subsequent shift (missed). Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used for statistical comparisons. In January 2017, there were 25 patients (117 days of monitoring) in the EMU and 54 inpatients (146 days of monitoring) on cEEG with 92 total events, (39% seizures). In June 2017, there were 30 patients (133 days of monitoring) in the EMU and 47 additional inpatients (80 days of monitoring) on cEEG with 110 total events, (39% seizures). The number of events identified in real time was low and did not significantly differ among shifts regardless of the availability of the monitoring technologist. Most events were identified at the time of subsequent EEG scanning by the EEG technologist. Partial staffing for continuous video EEG surveillance is insufficient to identify events in real time. EEG technologists are able to identify events during regular EEG scanning.

缺乏连续视频脑电图监控导致事件报告延迟。
虽然在视频脑电图记录过程中需要进行实时事件检测以确保患者安全,但这受到技术人员可用性的限制。我们试图探究一个三级学术中心的脑电图技师进行实时事件检测的效率。我们回顾性地查看了 2017 年 1 月和 2017 年 6 月连续住院患者视频脑电图(cEEGs)和癫痫监测单元(EMU)记录的事件,前者仅在夜班期间提供实时监控,而后者则在所有班次期间都有专门的神经诊断脑电图技师进行实时监控。事件被分为立即发现的事件(眼见事件)、同一班次晚些时候发现的事件(延迟事件)或下一班次发现的事件(漏报事件)。统计比较采用卡方检验和费雪精确检验。2017 年 1 月,EMU 有 25 名患者(监测 117 天),cEEG 有 54 名住院患者(监测 146 天),共发生 92 起事件(39% 为癫痫发作)。2017 年 6 月,监护室有 30 名患者(监测 133 天),另有 47 名住院患者(监测 80 天)接受了 cEEG 监测,共发生 110 起事件(39% 为癫痫发作)。实时识别的事件数量较少,而且无论监测技术专家是否在岗,各班次之间的差异都不大。大多数事件是在脑电图技师进行后续脑电图扫描时发现的。连续视频脑电图监控的部分人员配备不足以实时识别事件。脑电图技师能够在常规脑电图扫描时识别事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Neurodiagnostic Journal
The Neurodiagnostic Journal Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Neurodiagnostic Journal is the official journal of ASET - The Neurodiagnostic Society. It serves as an educational resource for Neurodiagnostic professionals, a vehicle for introducing new techniques and innovative technologies in the field, patient safety and advocacy, and an avenue for sharing best practices within the Neurodiagnostic Technology profession. The journal features original articles about electroencephalography (EEG), evoked potentials (EP), intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), nerve conduction (NC), polysomnography (PSG), autonomic testing, and long-term monitoring (LTM) in the intensive care (ICU) and epilepsy monitoring units (EMU). Subject matter also includes education, training, lab management, legislative and licensure needs, guidelines for standards of care, and the impact of our profession in healthcare and society. The journal seeks to foster ideas, commentary, and news from technologists, physicians, clinicians, managers/leaders, and professional organizations, and to introduce trends and the latest developments in the field of neurodiagnostics. Media reviews, case studies, ASET Annual Conference proceedings, review articles, and quizzes for ASET-CEUs are also published in The Neurodiagnostic Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信