Respiratory Therapist-Driven Mechanical Ventilation Protocol Is Associated With Increased Lung Protective Ventilation.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Alaina C Berg, Erin Evans, Uche E Okoro, Vivian Pham, Tyler M Foley, Chloe Hlas, Justin D Kuhn, Boulos Nassar, Brian M Fuller, Nicholas M Mohr
{"title":"Respiratory Therapist-Driven Mechanical Ventilation Protocol Is Associated With Increased Lung Protective Ventilation.","authors":"Alaina C Berg, Erin Evans, Uche E Okoro, Vivian Pham, Tyler M Foley, Chloe Hlas, Justin D Kuhn, Boulos Nassar, Brian M Fuller, Nicholas M Mohr","doi":"10.4187/respcare.11599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mechanical ventilation is a common life-saving procedure but can lead to serious complications, including ARDS and oxygen toxicity. Nonadherence to lung-protective ventilation guidelines is common. We hypothesized that a respiratory therapist-driven mechanical ventilation bundle could increase adherence to lung-protective ventilation and decrease the incidence of pulmonary complications in the ICU.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A respiratory therapist-driven protocol was implemented on August 1, 2018, in all adult ICUs of a Midwestern academic tertiary center. The protocol targeted low tidal volume, adequate PEEP, limiting oxygen, adequate breathing frequency, and head of the bed elevation. Adherence to lung-protective guidelines and clinical outcomes were retrospectively observed in adult subjects admitted to the ICU and on ventilation for ≥ 24 h between January 2011 and December 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 666 subjects; 68.5% were in the pre-intervention group and 31.5% were in the post-intervention group. After adjusting for body mass index and intubation indication, a significant increase in overall adherence to lung-protective ventilation guidelines was observed in the post-intervention period (adjusted odds ratio 2.48, 95% CI 1.73-3.56). Fewer subjects were diagnosed with ARDS in the post-intervention group (adjusted odds ratio 0.22, 95% CI 0.08-0.65) than in the pre-intervention group. There was no difference in the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia, ventilator-free days, ICU mortality, or death within 1 month of ICU discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A respiratory therapist-driven protocol increased adherence to lung-protective mechanical ventilation guidelines in the ICU and was associated with decreased ARDS incidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":"1071-1080"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11349598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.11599","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mechanical ventilation is a common life-saving procedure but can lead to serious complications, including ARDS and oxygen toxicity. Nonadherence to lung-protective ventilation guidelines is common. We hypothesized that a respiratory therapist-driven mechanical ventilation bundle could increase adherence to lung-protective ventilation and decrease the incidence of pulmonary complications in the ICU.

Methods: A respiratory therapist-driven protocol was implemented on August 1, 2018, in all adult ICUs of a Midwestern academic tertiary center. The protocol targeted low tidal volume, adequate PEEP, limiting oxygen, adequate breathing frequency, and head of the bed elevation. Adherence to lung-protective guidelines and clinical outcomes were retrospectively observed in adult subjects admitted to the ICU and on ventilation for ≥ 24 h between January 2011 and December 2019.

Results: We included 666 subjects; 68.5% were in the pre-intervention group and 31.5% were in the post-intervention group. After adjusting for body mass index and intubation indication, a significant increase in overall adherence to lung-protective ventilation guidelines was observed in the post-intervention period (adjusted odds ratio 2.48, 95% CI 1.73-3.56). Fewer subjects were diagnosed with ARDS in the post-intervention group (adjusted odds ratio 0.22, 95% CI 0.08-0.65) than in the pre-intervention group. There was no difference in the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia, ventilator-free days, ICU mortality, or death within 1 month of ICU discharge.

Conclusions: A respiratory therapist-driven protocol increased adherence to lung-protective mechanical ventilation guidelines in the ICU and was associated with decreased ARDS incidence.

呼吸治疗师驱动的机械通气方案与肺保护性通气的增加有关。
背景:机械通气是一种常见的挽救生命的方法,但可能导致严重的并发症,包括 ARDS 和氧中毒。不遵守肺保护性通气指南的情况很常见。我们假设,由呼吸治疗师主导的机械通气捆绑疗法可以提高肺保护性通气的依从性,降低重症监护病房肺部并发症的发生率:2018年8月1日,美国中西部一家三级学术中心的所有成人重症监护病房实施了由呼吸治疗师驱动的方案。该方案以低潮气量、充足的 PEEP、限氧、充足的呼吸频率和床头抬高为目标。我们对2011年1月至2019年12月期间入住重症监护室且通气时间≥24小时的成人受试者遵守肺保护指南的情况和临床结果进行了回顾性观察:我们纳入了 666 名受试者,其中 68.5% 属于干预前组,31.5% 属于干预后组。在对体重指数和插管指征进行调整后,观察到干预后遵守肺保护性通气指南的总体情况显著增加(调整后的几率比为 2.48,95% CI 为 1.73-3.56)。与干预前相比,干预后组中确诊为 ARDS 的受试者更少(调整后的几率比 0.22,95% CI 0.08-0.65)。呼吸机相关肺炎、无呼吸机天数、ICU死亡率或ICU出院后1个月内死亡的发生率没有差异:由呼吸治疗师主导的方案提高了重症监护病房对肺保护性机械通气指南的依从性,并与 ARDS 发生率的降低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信