Opioid-sparing effect of erector spinae plane block and intravenous dexmedetomidine for obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea: A randomized controlled trial.

Q3 Medicine
Mona Raafat Elghamry, Atteia Gad Anwar, Shaimaa Waheed Zahra
{"title":"Opioid-sparing effect of erector spinae plane block and intravenous dexmedetomidine for obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Mona Raafat Elghamry, Atteia Gad Anwar, Shaimaa Waheed Zahra","doi":"10.5055/jom.0873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed the impact of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine in reduction of perioperative opioid consumption following bariatric surgery and their impact on post-operative recovery, analgesia, and pulmonary functions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tanta University Hospitals, Tanta, Gharboa, Egypt.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Forty obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), aged 20-55 years, and eligible for bariatric surgery were included.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients randomized into group I (received general anesthesia [GA] with opioid, sham ESPB, and IV normal saline) or group II (received GA [without opioid], ESPB [at T7 level] using 20 mL bupivacaine 0.25 percent and bolus IV dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg and then 0.25 µg/kg/h).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Fentanyl consumption (primary outcome), sevoflurane consumption, recovery time, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and pulmonary functions (secondary outcomes) were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Perioperative fentanyl (intraoperative, post-operative, and total) consumption and sevoflurane consumption were substantially lower in group II compared to group I (p = 0.010, <0.001, <0.001, and <0.001, respectively). Moreover, recovery time was shorter in group II (p < 0.001). At 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours after surgery, group I patients had VAS values considerably higher. Relative to preoperative values, pulmonary function did not significantly alter after surgery. Oxygen desaturation was significantly lower in group II (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ESPB with IV dexmedetomidine is advantageous for OSAS patients having bariatric surgery as it provides anesthesia and opioid-sparing effect with short recovery, adequate analgesia, and nonsignificant complications. Yet, it had no effect on post-operative pulmonary function.</p>","PeriodicalId":16601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of opioid management","volume":"20 3","pages":"243-253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of opioid management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jom.0873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study assessed the impact of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine in reduction of perioperative opioid consumption following bariatric surgery and their impact on post-operative recovery, analgesia, and pulmonary functions.

Design: A randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Tanta University Hospitals, Tanta, Gharboa, Egypt.

Patients: Forty obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), aged 20-55 years, and eligible for bariatric surgery were included.

Interventions: Patients randomized into group I (received general anesthesia [GA] with opioid, sham ESPB, and IV normal saline) or group II (received GA [without opioid], ESPB [at T7 level] using 20 mL bupivacaine 0.25 percent and bolus IV dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg and then 0.25 µg/kg/h).

Main outcome measures: Fentanyl consumption (primary outcome), sevoflurane consumption, recovery time, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and pulmonary functions (secondary outcomes) were recorded.

Results: Perioperative fentanyl (intraoperative, post-operative, and total) consumption and sevoflurane consumption were substantially lower in group II compared to group I (p = 0.010, <0.001, <0.001, and <0.001, respectively). Moreover, recovery time was shorter in group II (p < 0.001). At 2, 4, 8, and 24 hours after surgery, group I patients had VAS values considerably higher. Relative to preoperative values, pulmonary function did not significantly alter after surgery. Oxygen desaturation was significantly lower in group II (p = 0.001).

Conclusions: The ESPB with IV dexmedetomidine is advantageous for OSAS patients having bariatric surgery as it provides anesthesia and opioid-sparing effect with short recovery, adequate analgesia, and nonsignificant complications. Yet, it had no effect on post-operative pulmonary function.

竖脊肌平面阻滞和静脉注射右美托咪定对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停肥胖患者的阿片类药物节约效果:随机对照试验
研究目的本研究评估了直立肌脊柱平面阻滞(ESPB)和静脉注射右美托咪定对减少减肥手术围手术期阿片类药物用量的影响,以及它们对术后恢复、镇痛和肺功能的影响:随机对照试验:患者:40 名患有阻塞性肺疾病的肥胖患者:患者:40 名患有阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)的肥胖患者,年龄在 20-55 岁之间,符合减肥手术条件:患者随机分为I组(接受含阿片类药物的全身麻醉[GA]、假ESPB和静脉注射生理盐水)或II组(接受GA[不含阿片类药物]、ESPB[T7水平],使用20 mL 0.25%布比卡因和静脉注射右美托咪定1 µg/kg,然后0.25 µg/kg/h):记录芬太尼用量(主要结果)、七氟烷用量、恢复时间、视觉模拟量表(VAS)和肺功能(次要结果):结果:与 I 组相比,II 组围手术期芬太尼(术中、术后和总计)消耗量和七氟醚消耗量大幅降低(P = 0.010,结论:II 组的芬太尼消耗量和七氟醚消耗量均低于 I 组(P = 0.010,结论:II 组的芬太尼消耗量和七氟醚消耗量均低于 I 组):静脉注射右美托咪定的ESPB对接受减肥手术的OSAS患者来说是一种优势,因为它能提供麻醉和阿片类药物节省效果,且恢复期短、镇痛充分、并发症少。然而,它对术后肺功能没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of opioid management
Journal of opioid management Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Opioid Management deals with all aspects of opioids. From basic science, pre-clinical, clinical, abuse, compliance and addiction medicine, the journal provides and unbiased forum for researchers and clinicians to explore and manage the complexities of opioid prescription.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信