Association between depression severity, mental health recovery and dropout from behavioral health care treatment

Jason B. Gibbons , Shelbi A. Cox , Loreen Straub , Josephine S. Au , Philip S. Wang , Jun Liu , Alyson Albano , Rachel Wood , Matthew Ruble , John Peloquin , Rajendra Aldis , Lauren V. Moran
{"title":"Association between depression severity, mental health recovery and dropout from behavioral health care treatment","authors":"Jason B. Gibbons ,&nbsp;Shelbi A. Cox ,&nbsp;Loreen Straub ,&nbsp;Josephine S. Au ,&nbsp;Philip S. Wang ,&nbsp;Jun Liu ,&nbsp;Alyson Albano ,&nbsp;Rachel Wood ,&nbsp;Matthew Ruble ,&nbsp;John Peloquin ,&nbsp;Rajendra Aldis ,&nbsp;Lauren V. Moran","doi":"10.1016/j.psycom.2024.100185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Understanding the relationship between depression severity, patient recovery, and treatment continuity may help optimize the delivery of behavioral health services.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using Cox proportional hazards regression, this study measures the association between treatment dropout and baseline depression severity, as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and the association between treatment dropout and baseline recovery, as measured by the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS). The study also explores heterogeneity by service line (general mental health, substance use disorder, and eating disorder), residential versus intermediate level of care setting, age groups (adolescent and adult), and dropout factors. The data include 14,689 patients treated at a multi-state behavioral health care provider, discharged between 2021 and 2022. Premature dropout from behavioral health care treatment for any cause, patient factors and administrative factors were used as separate outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>A unit increase in baseline PHQ-9 was associated with a 1.2% reduced treatment dropout risk (hazard ratio (HR): 0.988; 95% confidence interval [0.983–0.992]). A unit increase in baseline RAS score was associated with 0.5% increased dropout likelihood (HR: 1.005; 95% CI [1.004, 1.007]). Subgroup analyses show associations are driven by general mental health, adolescent, and intermediate level of care subgroups. Patients with higher baseline suicidality and lower willigness to ask for helphad a reduced risk of dropout.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Patients with greater depression severity and lower recovery scores at admission were more likely to stay in behavioral health treatment, especially among adolescents, patients with general mental health issues, and outpatients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74595,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry research communications","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100185"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277259872400031X/pdfft?md5=668ff34c066254bf4121e60df7506185&pid=1-s2.0-S277259872400031X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry research communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277259872400031X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Understanding the relationship between depression severity, patient recovery, and treatment continuity may help optimize the delivery of behavioral health services.

Methods

Using Cox proportional hazards regression, this study measures the association between treatment dropout and baseline depression severity, as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and the association between treatment dropout and baseline recovery, as measured by the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS). The study also explores heterogeneity by service line (general mental health, substance use disorder, and eating disorder), residential versus intermediate level of care setting, age groups (adolescent and adult), and dropout factors. The data include 14,689 patients treated at a multi-state behavioral health care provider, discharged between 2021 and 2022. Premature dropout from behavioral health care treatment for any cause, patient factors and administrative factors were used as separate outcomes.

Findings

A unit increase in baseline PHQ-9 was associated with a 1.2% reduced treatment dropout risk (hazard ratio (HR): 0.988; 95% confidence interval [0.983–0.992]). A unit increase in baseline RAS score was associated with 0.5% increased dropout likelihood (HR: 1.005; 95% CI [1.004, 1.007]). Subgroup analyses show associations are driven by general mental health, adolescent, and intermediate level of care subgroups. Patients with higher baseline suicidality and lower willigness to ask for helphad a reduced risk of dropout.

Interpretation

Patients with greater depression severity and lower recovery scores at admission were more likely to stay in behavioral health treatment, especially among adolescents, patients with general mental health issues, and outpatients.

抑郁症严重程度、心理健康恢复和行为保健治疗辍学之间的关系
背景了解抑郁症严重程度、患者康复和治疗持续性之间的关系有助于优化行为健康服务的提供。方法本研究采用考克斯比例危险回归法,测量了治疗辍学与基线抑郁症严重程度(以患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)为测量指标)之间的关系,以及治疗辍学与基线康复(以康复评估量表(RAS)为测量指标)之间的关系。该研究还探讨了服务项目(普通精神健康、药物使用障碍和饮食失调)、住院治疗与中级治疗环境、年龄组(青少年和成人)以及辍学因素之间的异质性。数据包括 14,689 名在多州行为医疗机构接受治疗的患者,他们都是在 2021 年至 2022 年期间出院的。研究结果 基线PHQ-9增加一个单位,治疗退出风险降低1.2%(危险比(HR):0.988;95%置信区间[0.983-0.992])。基线 RAS 评分每增加一个单位,辍治可能性增加 0.5%(HR:1.005;95% 置信区间 [1.004,1.007])。亚组分析表明,相关性由普通心理健康、青少年和中级护理亚组驱动。入院时抑郁严重程度较高、康复评分较低的患者更有可能继续接受行为健康治疗,尤其是青少年、有一般精神健康问题的患者和门诊患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatry research communications
Psychiatry research communications Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
77 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信