Diversity in the acceptance of sustainable aviation fuels: Uncovering varying motivational patterns

Eva-Maria Schomakers, Linda Engelmann, Martina Ziefle
{"title":"Diversity in the acceptance of sustainable aviation fuels: Uncovering varying motivational patterns","authors":"Eva-Maria Schomakers,&nbsp;Linda Engelmann,&nbsp;Martina Ziefle","doi":"10.1016/j.jfueco.2024.100129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aviation sector’s significant contribution to greenhouse gas emissions has spurred interest in sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) as a means to mitigate environmental impact. This study examines user diversity in the public acceptance of power-to-liquid aviation fuels (eSAF), exploring varying attitudes towards the environment, flying, and eSAF adoption. Through a quantitative survey of a representative German sample, three distinct segments emerged: the Environment-Centered Approvers, the Flying-Centered Approvers, and the Skeptical. The Environment-Centered Approvers prioritize environmental concerns and perceive moral obligations to use eSAF for climate protection. In contrast, the Flying-Centered Approvers prioritize the continuation of flying with reduced environmental impact, while the Skeptical exhibit a more cautious and uncertain stance towards eSAF adoption. The study highlights the importance of tailoring communication strategies based on the unique motivations and concerns of each subgroup to effectively promote eSAF adoption.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100556,"journal":{"name":"Fuel Communications","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666052024000244/pdfft?md5=32ab733c7b18d0d4f199763a996b2ec6&pid=1-s2.0-S2666052024000244-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fuel Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666052024000244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aviation sector’s significant contribution to greenhouse gas emissions has spurred interest in sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) as a means to mitigate environmental impact. This study examines user diversity in the public acceptance of power-to-liquid aviation fuels (eSAF), exploring varying attitudes towards the environment, flying, and eSAF adoption. Through a quantitative survey of a representative German sample, three distinct segments emerged: the Environment-Centered Approvers, the Flying-Centered Approvers, and the Skeptical. The Environment-Centered Approvers prioritize environmental concerns and perceive moral obligations to use eSAF for climate protection. In contrast, the Flying-Centered Approvers prioritize the continuation of flying with reduced environmental impact, while the Skeptical exhibit a more cautious and uncertain stance towards eSAF adoption. The study highlights the importance of tailoring communication strategies based on the unique motivations and concerns of each subgroup to effectively promote eSAF adoption.

接受可持续航空燃料的多样性:发现不同的动机模式
航空业对温室气体排放贡献巨大,这激发了人们对可持续航空燃料(SAF)作为减轻环境影响手段的兴趣。本研究考察了公众对动力液化航空燃料(eSAF)接受程度的用户多样性,探讨了对环境、飞行和采用 eSAF 的不同态度。通过对具有代表性的德国样本进行定量调查,发现了三个不同的群体:以环境为中心的赞同者、以飞行为中心的赞同者和持怀疑态度的人。以环境为中心的赞同者将环境问题放在首位,并认为有道德义务使用 eSAF 来保护气候。相比之下,以飞行为中心的赞同者优先考虑的是在减少环境影响的情况下继续飞行,而持怀疑态度的人则对采用 eSAF 表现出更加谨慎和不确定的态度。这项研究强调了根据每个子群体的独特动机和关注点来定制传播策略的重要性,以有效促进 eSAF 的采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信